"I am sure if a violent crime was committed the kid would eventually report it. "
Nope. These programs are very effective, ya know. When I was fighting through the courts to stay out of Straight just prior to coming of age, I didn't understand that what I had seen and had been done to me was abuse. They asked, I said no, not really abuse. I believed at that time that I got sat on for a couple of hours by 4 - 6 girls on staff's order because I deserved it. My crime had been refusing to apologize to Group for running away. Not cussing, far less hurting anybody. Just saying I wasn't sorry, I wanted out and didn't want or need any more "help". That was after well over a year.
I doubt we even find out about all of the deaths. We only hear about it if the media picks up on it. The parents don't usually tell everybody. The parents usually blame the kid.
Here's what one WWASP mother said to a reporter after her son shot himself in the head while they were arguing over his getting sent back for some minor or perceived infraction or other:
"Despite the tragic outcome, Laura says that Teen Help was a godsend. Without it, she says, Corey might have died years earlier"
http://www.denver-rmn.com/desperate/sit ... esp1.shtmlSo any study would have to be done like a criminal investigation. There would have to be enforcement of reporting requirements w/ teeth and a baseball bat when necessary. Kids would have to have practical, useful access to not only the outside world, but free time to relax, think for themselves, recreate, chat with friends
outside of the institution, etc.
For all that to happen, we have to dispel the pervasive belief that teenagers are vile and violent animals who can't be trusted and should not be believed. Or at LEAST the one that they should be locked up incommunicado w/o criminal conviction.
Sometimes I lie awake at night, and I ask, "Where have I gone wrong?" Then a voice says to me, "This is going to take more than one night."
-- Charlie Brown, _Peanuts_ [Charles Schulz]