« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: SMALL CLAIMS DECISION  (Read 2630 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SMALL CLAIMS DECISION
« on: November 03, 2005, 11:55:00 PM »
MARK SUDWEEKS WAS NOT AWARDED THE $5,000 HE WAS SEEKING IN THE SMALL CLAIMS SUIT HE BROUGHT AGAINST A FORMER STUDENT. :razz:  :razz:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SMALL CLAIMS DECISION
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2005, 12:07:00 AM »
That is great news. He should not have brought a claim against that young girl in the first place!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SMALL CLAIMS DECISION
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2005, 12:34:00 AM »
What's the deal with the Sudweeks and HORSES?
Google "Laeysa Sudweeks"

There is posting after posting of this young teenage daughter of the Sudweeks advertising HORSES "FOR SALE."

Are the Sudweeks no longer going to offer their EQUINE HORSE PROGRAM at the Whitmore? Is that why they are selling off the herd?

Doesn't selling "Registered Horses" require that the horses must be registered to the person offering them for sale?  Think the Suds have transferred ownership of these advertised valuable horses to a mere teenager?
What's going on here?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SMALL CLAIMS DECISION
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2005, 01:33:00 PM »
Maybe they need money? Paying lots of lawyers, aren't they?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SMALL CLAIMS DECISION
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2005, 07:26:00 PM »
Sure some hefty prices on those horses. And a teenage horse dealter with all that responsibility of selling them? Sure.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SMALL CLAIMS DECISION
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2005, 12:19:00 AM »
Plain and simple tax evasion.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SMALL CLAIMS DECISION
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2005, 04:37:00 PM »
Thought it was illegal for anyone except the registered owner to advertise registered horses for sale? Think the Suds transferred ownership of all these horses to a teenage daugher before they allowed her to advertise them "for sale" on the internet?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Robert Moore

  • Posts: 9
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
SMALL CLAIMS DECISION
« Reply #7 on: November 24, 2005, 06:59:00 PM »
Laeysa Sudweeks is over the age of 18.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
ith love you can do powerful things.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SMALL CLAIMS DECISION
« Reply #8 on: November 26, 2005, 01:24:00 PM »
18 is still a teenager, duh!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SMALL CLAIMS DECISION
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2005, 01:24:00 PM »
Question was: Did the Suds transfer these registered horses into the name of a TEENAGER?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SMALL CLAIMS DECISION
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2005, 08:21:00 PM »
no they didnt and who gives a rats ass if they did?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SMALL CLAIMS DECISION
« Reply #11 on: December 02, 2005, 12:37:00 PM »
Well, it's sort of against the RULES to advertise registered horses FOR SALE in the name of anyone except the registered owner. But, since when do the Sudweeks follow any rules, huh?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »