On 2005-09-16 23:09:00, Antigen wrote:
"
On 2005-09-16 08:35:00, the wet noodle wrote:
I said that XA is ALWAYS voluntary...there are just some FOLKS in XA that have other ideas...
How is anyone to make the distinction between XA and those FOLKS in XA?Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/188301123X/circlofmiamithem' target='_new'>George Washington
"
I am done with this conversation. We are never going to agree on this... Against my better judgment I will respond to you one last time...
Saying that XA should be held responsible for the actions of all of its members is the same as saying that all christians (which I am not)should be held responsible for the actions of George Bush (who claims to be a christian) or that all Boy Scouts should be held responsible for the actions of all other boy scouts...
I have a challenge for you Antigen...find me ONE of these people who claim to be speaking/acting ON BEHALF of XA...
The XA proram (Steps/literature/speakers) does not condone or endorse ANY non-voluntary endoctrination... period...