Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Seed Discussion Forum

Note to John Underwood

<< < (9/23) > >>

Anonymous:
:grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin: sorry for all the smiley faces I'm just feeling kinda "groovy" right now my own self.

Ft. Lauderdale:
"William" is often credited with making a statement to the effect of, ``if two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred'', but see below. This principle is widely known as "Occam's Razor."

Antigen referred to "Occam's Razor" in an eariler post.  

I just wanted any other "dummy's like myself to understand. :grin:

Stripe:
Antigen WROTE:
So, in summary, you're right about the logo. It's not a terribly important detail. Lots of organizations use symbolic logos and imagry. But you must admit that it is very apropos that this particular organization's chosen logo is based on a myth.

Antigen, I could not agree more.  That was me  who wrote about the bird/bus bird/tree.  But you guys are right - who cares.  The fact is, the seed was based on a myth.  I doubt they meant to do that, just another case of good intentions gone bad...[ This Message was edited by: Stripe on 2005-08-10 08:58 ]

And you are right Greg, that's exactly where my google word search led me - that Christian Answers site.  Like everything else in the world, its just an idea.  [ This Message was edited by: Stripe on 2005-08-10 09:00 ][ This Message was edited by: Stripe on 2005-08-10 09:10 ]

Anonymous:

--- Quote ---On 2005-08-10 06:53:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Have you ever deleted Antigen's or your own posts for the same reason what you've deleted mine for?



Some how I believe you guys might be abusing your own "power" the same way you say the Seed did. Maybe Antigen wears the so called "pants" here and your not able to "do the  "right thing" due to her position here.  :roll: "

--- End quote ---


What exactly is your beef?  You know your post was over the top. Care to rephrase it and add some pertinent content? Go right ahead, but a two sentence post questioning someone's sexuality and alluding to their crotch won't stand here. Sorry, that is my rule.  I, not Ginger, control content in this forum. Ginger is  the one that graciously donates the bandwith. If Ginger was calling the shots here that post would have stood. I have seen people insult her far worse in unmoderated forums that she controls with nary a hickup from her.

That I control content here is why The SDF discussion forum is the ONLY moderated forum on fornits.  All other forums follow a different format. I did this intentionally so people with contrary opinions would not be shouted out, like has been done in other forums. It is not perfect but the intended result has come to frution.

If Ginger posted something similar to what you did, I would take her to task for it. Believe that.  However, I have known her long enough to realize that is highly unlikely.

Any more questions might I suggest a private message and a one on one conversation?


GregFL

GregFL:

--- Quote ---On 2005-08-10 06:55:00, Anonymous wrote:

" :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin:  :grin: sorry for all the smiley faces I'm just feeling kinda groovy right now my own self."

--- End quote ---


Where did you meet "Kinda Groovy"?

 :grin:  :grin:  :grin:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version