Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Brat Camp

BRAT CAMP TEEN ARRESTED

<< < (9/19) > >>

Anonymous:

--- Quote ---Why are they editing out all the 'private' counseling sessions with Isaiah and Frank???
What manly advice and guidance is Flying Eagle giving these two?

--- End quote ---

So it's okay to make a girl tell the nation how she was sexually molested when she was twelve but now the counsellors have something to say they turn the cameras away.  I wonder what threats they are making that they don't want the audience to know about.

Nihilanthic:

--- Quote ---On 2005-08-05 01:31:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
--- Quote ---
On 2005-08-04 23:28:00, Anonymous wrote:


"I watched about 15 minutes of the show and wanted to puke. I couldn't bear to watch these kids be put through hell, all while they were made to look like little punks. I think we should have all boycotted rather than watch the show.





Anyone get a chance to look at the TV Guide listing online? I did the other day and there were three WWASP ads below the listing for last week's Brat Camp. Three different web sites that all led to WWASP. Not surprised a bit."


--- End quote ---

I know of at least one kid who got sent to Tranquility Bay because his father got the idea from watching Brat Camp."

--- End quote ---


His father has to be the biggest moron on the face of the fucking planet.  :flame:
There is so much in the bible against which every insinct of my being rebels, so much so that I regret the necessity which has compelled me to read it through from beginning to end. I do not think that the knowledge I have gained of its history and sources compensates me for the unpleasant details it has forced upon my attention.
--Helen Keller, American lecturer
--- End quote ---

Troll Control:

--- Quote ---On 2005-08-04 18:14:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Sorry-the way your post was stuctured it looked like YOU work for a wilderness program.  Silly me.  Looking back at your old posts it all comes back. You are the woman with the agenda to pay the world back for your kid going to Hidden Lake.  

"

--- End quote ---

And you're the wretched little waste of space that relies on ad hominem attacks due to your cognitive deficiencies.

Nice to see ya again!  Wanna argue?  You have never been able even to respond coherently, but I'm willing to give you another chance.  I won't quit on you like you quit on your kid...promise!   :wave:

Anonymous:
Now that is impressive,--I always thought of Dysfunction as a computer geek with no particular skills aside from the technical ones: but he spelled "ad hominem" correctly (not "ad hominum" which is wrong and is in the way most people spell it)

OK Dys--you've proven you're an intellectual---now you can relax and have a legitimate argument with posters like the last one who you are concerned has "cognitive deficiencies".

"Ad hominem" attacks are low brow, no question--- making cracks about somebody's "cognitive deficiencies": now just how would you evaluate that level of debate?

Troll Control:

--- Quote ---On 2005-08-05 07:35:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Now that is impressive,--I always thought of Dysfunction as a computer geek with no particular skills aside from the technical ones: but he spelled "ad hominem" correctly (not "ad hominum" which is wrong and is in the way most people spell it)



OK Dys--you've proven you're an intellectual---now you can relax and have a legitimate argument with posters like the last one who you are concerned has "cognitive deficiencies".



"Ad hominem" attacks are low brow, no question--- making cracks about somebody's "cognitive deficiencies": now just how would you evaluate that level of debate?"

--- End quote ---

What I would like to see is a debate (where ad hominem attacks are objectively extirpated) between this Struggling Troll and Deborah.

As for the "crack " I made...  This is solely in response to the name-calling and "low-brow" remarks made by this poster who STEADFASTLY REFUSES to debate the facts, but rather resorts to this type of behavior.  

If this person feels so secure about how they have treated their child, then why not open it up for real debate?  Why call names every time someone tries to engage this person in meaningful dialogue about the program to which she sent her child?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version