On 2005-06-30 12:25:00, Anonymous wrote:
"
On 2005-06-30 12:00:00, Paul wrote:
"If you can't tell what I am obsessed about, then perhaps you shouldn't be posting that I am obsessed!"
Well, I know you are obsessed with Deborah. That much is obvious. "
I don't agree with you.
Deborah is a prolific poster on cerain issues. I don't know all of what she posts on at Fornits. As I told Ginger when I joined, that my only contribution could be in the area of mental health where I am an advocate.
When Deborah floods an issue and doesn't make clear who her references are from. It can be dangerous for those attempting to make an unbiased
decision on what type of treatment to seek.
I would be remis in not pointing that out.
She could have just said, oh yeah, I will make that clear.
Instead she has consistantly attacked me.
Even Ginger told her to read up on the COS!
No one, not even Deborah, gave Ginger a hard
time for that post.
I am villified. Whatever!
Perhaps I should never have posted and said that there are rights attached to every law.
Perhaps I shouldn't post when a law reads that it is voluntary. I have now realized even posting the word voluntary will guarantee and onslaught of abuse towards me.
Perhaps if someone posts absolutes and states that a certain medication or treatment such as ECT causes brain damage ... everytime ... that I should not point out that is not accurate. Whatever, so I choose to point out innacuracies. Is that really such a big deal?
Look, if you don't like my posts, just don't read them.
I could care less about Deborah. I do care about biased and misleading posts in the area where a have some knowledge. If you would like to continue to criticize me for that, then, obviously that is your right. No one will stop you. Have fun.