« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Supreme Court Rules Cities May Seize Homes  (Read 1513 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Supreme Court Rules Cities May Seize Homes
« on: June 24, 2005, 10:10:00 AM »
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Supreme Court Rules Cities May Seize Homes
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2005, 12:36:00 PM »
Anybody think it's mere coincidence that this rullig comes under an admin who's president made a mint off of sports arenas built on eminent domain takings and who's campaign finance chair is a commercial developer?

The law in its majestic equality, forbids all men to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread - the rich as well as the poor

--Anatole France

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Erinys

  • Posts: 170
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Supreme Court Rules Cities May Seize Homes
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2005, 02:10:00 PM »
No coincidence.  But here's something, the posters at Free Republic are howlin' and trying to blame it on the "liberals"  or the Dems. ubet.

Somethings coming down, maybe just maybe the wingnits will get a clue that the "Family Values, Patriotism,  Keep America Safe and Free blah blah is just that.

The movers and shakers in this administration don't really care about the individual American's home, family, life or liberty.

If ya don't have money power yer just so much meat fer the grinder.

But of course, if ya don't make money, you can't be a REAL American now can ya.  

I suppose it would be unreasonable to propose that those who have their property confiscated would be forever after exempt from any  taxes assessed by the State who siezed their property for the sake of higher tax revenues

Duct tape is like the force; it has a light side and a dark side and it holds the universe together.
--Jedi Knight school drop out.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline OverLordd

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 802
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Supreme Court Rules Cities May Seize Homes
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2005, 03:04:00 PM »
Quote
Anybody think it's mere coincidence that this rullig comes under an admin who's president made a mint off of sports arenas built on eminent domain takings and who's campaign finance chair is a commercial developer?


Bush has not appointed a single Judge, he has nothing to do with the decision, he cannot affect it, it had nothing to do with him.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
our walking down a hallway, you turn left, you turn right. BRICK WALL!

GAH!!!!

Yeah, hes a survivor.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Supreme Court Rules Cities May Seize Homes
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2005, 03:08:00 PM »
Quote



"Bush has not appointed a single Judge, he has nothing to do with the decision, he cannot affect it, it had nothing to do with him."


What the heck do you love about Bush so much? What, if anything positive has he done?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline OverLordd

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 802
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Supreme Court Rules Cities May Seize Homes
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2005, 03:14:00 PM »
::coughs:: oh... the liberation of a few million people, he had dragged us out of a pretty deep resesion, he has not slept with any one in the office, and he is a good man.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
our walking down a hallway, you turn left, you turn right. BRICK WALL!

GAH!!!!

Yeah, hes a survivor.

Offline thepatriot

  • Posts: 570
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Supreme Court Rules Cities May Seize Homes
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2005, 03:16:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-06-24 12:08:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote





"Bush has not appointed a single Judge, he has nothing to do with the decision, he cannot affect it, it had nothing to do with him."




What the heck do you love about Bush so much? What, if anything positive has he done?"


Not a matter of loving Bush, he did not appoint these Judges. Once was appointed by Ford, one by Carter, on by BushI, one by Reagan and one by Clinton. By lets face every dam one of them on the hill Dem or Repub don't give a shit your property or mine. But if we keep allowing these rogue senile judges to do to do this shit. Welcome to Soviet Russia
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
arasota Straight Escapee

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Supreme Court Rules Cities May Seize Homes
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2005, 03:34:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-06-24 12:14:00, OverLordd wrote:

"::coughs:: oh... the liberation of a few million people, he had dragged us out of a pretty deep resesion, he has not slept with any one in the office, and he is a good man."


 :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »