Author Topic: And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc  (Read 7600 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #30 on: March 24, 2005, 04:44:00 PM »
Lady, have you READ the shit that's up on ISAC about Whitemore?  I'd say there's a "small remote chance" that children will be abused there.  The guy can't even take care of friggin' horses, and he's supposed to take care of children?  You're talking straight out of your ass!

Quote
On 2005-03-24 13:42:00, Susan Scheff wrote:

"I am good at finding care for children that fits their needs. Not just throwing them to the wolves in Utah to make a financial gain.WWASPS would have me back on their payroll as soon as I offered. I have never, nor will I ever make money putting children in a program or programs that even has THE SMALLEST REMOTE CHANCE THAT CHILDREN WILL BE ABUSED IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM.



_________________

I am one of the good people in all of this.[ This Message was edited by: Susan Scheff on 2005-03-24 13:43 ]"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #31 on: March 24, 2005, 04:48:00 PM »
Whitmore, Sue's "Cash Cow"--the guy's a danger around animals much less kids, and the wife is a lunatic playing therapist with the kids in what she calls group therapy---and Sheff can't quit sending kids there!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #32 on: March 24, 2005, 04:51:00 PM »
Did you say "Lady?"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #33 on: March 24, 2005, 05:00:00 PM »
Sue, you are not one of the good ones...you are one of the bad ones in my opion.  Children should not be referred to behavior mod programs.  They should stay home, and IF they need help it should be gotten locally.  I say this from experience Sue - children should not be seperated from their family.  Stupid bitch.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #34 on: March 24, 2005, 05:53:00 PM »
I believe in the transcript that Ms. Scheff said that children should be believed when they state allegations of abuse. Why doesn't this apply to the many many children at Whitmore Academy who are saying the Sudweeks abused them severely? Why?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #35 on: March 24, 2005, 06:00:00 PM »
You guys, this is going too far.

In case there was any doubt at all, I changed the name of user "Susan Schef" to "NOT Susan Scheff" pending contact w/ the prankster who's been writing under that name.

No, it's not me. I honestly don't know the ID of the person who's doing it. I did think it was funny as hell there for awhile, but I had NO idea that anyone would actually believe that it was really Susan Scheff writing that stuff! Satire, folks, satire!

Now, as to some of the other content here regarding Susan:

I stand by my terms of use and usual policy. I'm not responsible, legally or ethically, for what you folks decide to write. Personally, I find a lot of that stuff offensive, below the belt and (more importantly) beside the point. I don't like getting that kind of treatment and, despite how you or I may feel about anyone for other, more legitimate reasons, some of this stuff is just patently offensive.

I'm in no hurry to assist anyone who may get bent out of shape over it. But, now this is important, I can be legally compelled to cooperate w/ discovery if some letigious person decides they want to sue you for it!

And, personally, I just don't want to see any more blood-letting.

Just my 2ยข




How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate, they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to.
Anonymity Anonymous
Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #36 on: March 24, 2005, 06:15:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-03-24 14:53:00, Anonymous wrote:

"I believe in the transcript that Ms. Scheff said that children should be believed when they state allegations of abuse. Why doesn't this apply to the many many children at Whitmore Academy who are saying the Sudweeks abused them severely? Why?"


Excellent observation!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #37 on: March 24, 2005, 06:32:00 PM »
Boy, do I feel like a retard, arguing with a fake person.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #38 on: March 24, 2005, 09:23:00 PM »
Really! I'm so sorry. I would have said something sooner, but I really thought it would be obvious to everybody pretty quickly.

I have to admit, I did take the bait the first time Dr. Miller Newton posted. Not that I actually thought it was him (read his early posts, it's a lot more obvious) but I did think it was a sincere follower defending him for about a minute. Wish it had been the minute before, instead of the minute after, I posted. But, oh well, ya live and learn!  :rofl:

Cops; you wake `em up you gotta dance with `em. They lead.
-- Jack McNulty



_________________
Ginger Warbis ~ Antigen
Seed sibling `71 - `80
Straight South (Sarasota, FL)
   10/80 - 10/82
Anonymity Anonymous
Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #39 on: March 24, 2005, 11:54:00 PM »
Who ever you are posting  as Ms SS .

Its funny. I would take Ginger's comments as a serious waring.

The person whom you are impersonating would sue you.  Just because she can.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #40 on: March 28, 2005, 03:29:00 PM »
Anyone familiar with Sunrise Academy in Hurricane Utah?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #41 on: March 29, 2005, 09:38:00 AM »
People can read the WWASP Vs PURE transcript, but still people would like to know what schools PURE is currently referring to, what schools have been added since the trial. Are these schools "safer" than WWASP schools, and if so, what criteria makes them "safer?"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #42 on: March 29, 2005, 04:38:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-03-29 06:38:00, Anonymous wrote:

"People can read the WWASP Vs PURE transcript, but still people would like to know what schools PURE is currently referring to, what schools have been added since the trial. Are these schools "safer" than WWASP schools, and if so, what criteria makes them "safer?""


Sue said so.  :razz:

Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest.
--Denis Diderot, French encyclopedist

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #43 on: April 02, 2005, 04:30:00 PM »
I'd think anyone who was so proud of what they do would be so happy to list the wonderful, safe, alternatives to WWASP. Tell us Sue.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
And Sue Scheff May Have to Open Her Records and Show What Sc
« Reply #44 on: April 20, 2005, 01:14:00 PM »
ANYBODY ever think PURE will ever give a straight answer here?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »