Anon-
Thanks for the input. Your opinion is valid and appreciated.
However, based on the work of several people, including but not limited to Ronald Burks recent Doctoral Thesis,
Lifton,
Giambalvo and
Langone - I am inclined to disagree.
Let me suggest that our difference is one of perception. It is my impression that you percieve 'apathy towards aquiring information' as an excuse to remain ingnorant and under informed. It is not meant as such. My intention in my previous post is to provide some kind of understanding, an explanation that provides a pathway to changing the behavior, once it is identified and clearly associated with a post cult disorder situation.
On a sidebar note- The difference between registered and anonymous posting, at least in my case, is that it is my real name with my real email address attached to it. You may think that most of us will simply recognize your prose, but for new members it will not be so easy to determine which anonymous is which. Speaking for myself, I find it very difficult to determine who is who among unregistered postings.
I certainly do not mean to decry your choice to remain unregistered. I can only suggest that there is a difference, and despite your convictions to the contrary, it may well effect the level of credibility that others will assign to your statements.
In the same light my crappy syntax, poor spelling, and lousy typing will effect how some people view my statements. Your milage may vary.
James Lloyd