what we ought to do is...

[Anonymous]

make one of those lists like anti abortion groups do with the names and addresses of the real culprits behind the proliferation of illegitimate "programs". im talking about politicians, owners, anyone in a position of power who is aware of what really goes on and does nothing to stop it, anyone who stands to benefit from the lies, or anyone who tries to cover up the truth.

[Anonymous]

It would be a good quick resource.....would need to be updated regularly though----to keep up with all the name and location changes.

[Antigen]

I can make a database and interface. The troubling issue is always definitions. How do we determine who is and is not on the list? What's the specific criteria? How do we keep out the spam w/o having to task someone to ret the data?

Under normal circumstances, it's usually enough to just state as a disclaimer that all content is provided by the public and, therefore, no assurance of accuracy or truthfulness is implied. However, look at what the devout have done to wikipedia.

If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace.
--Thomas Paine

[Anonymous]

i dont think we should be concerned about accuracy. basically the ken kays, and lichfields of the world who are already in the public eye should suffice and then when we know enough about them we will know who hides behind them in the shadows.

[Anonymous]

can anyone "infiltrate" or even locate anything pertaining to internal operations within wwasps like emails memos and such? that would be fun to read. if you can do it, youre cool.