Sensitive information about Sue's disabled child?

[Anonymous]

So is what PURE does to WWASPS consider slander, or under the same cataegory of slander that you are claiming Carey does to PURE? :question:

[Anonymous]

On 2003-12-31 16:32:00, Deborah wrote:

"

So, Sue can act on her complaints and possibly jeopardize an entire forum of information unrelated to her specifically, without proving first that her allegations have any merit? She didn't have to show the posts she refers to as causing extreme emotional distress? Guilty until proven innocent?  Seems that if she's asking for an emergency injunction she'd have to fork over some evidence to support her claims. Shucks, and before Carey's depo was posted.

Ginger, couldn't you request that this issue be handled through mediation, since she has not requested that the distressing material be removed prior to filing a suit? Seems excessive and unnecessary, as you've already shown a willingness to edit private or personal information when requested.

And Carey, in that vein, can you counter sue her for posting your SS#? Shouldn't have to prove that it was indeed her.

Business must be good judging from the dollars she's spending on legal fees."

Emegency Injunction? What's that all about?