On 2004-01-01 20:27:00, turbinekat wrote:
"Ginger,
Its comments like "hackers", when referring to me that prove your hippo mouth overloads your bumble bee ass!!!
The difference between your comment and mine is that any reasonably intelligent 14yo would readily recognize mine as satire. Of course you're not a hacker and I didn't think for a moment that you'd forgotten your name. There's an excluded middle option there. Can you think of any?
I'm similar to you, via the internet, contrary to your beliefs...a freedom fighter & provider of information concerning child abuse. You have a public forum?I use my personal email account. Just because WE do not see eye to eye?WHY THE HATE LADY.
First of all, I don't hate you. I pitty you. You really think you're helping children here? Will you please take a look at some of the things you've posted here over the months?
Second, the pittiable thing is that I'm pretty sure you believe just what you're saying. I really do! Remember that I used to be one of you, in a way, so many years ago. You probably actually believe that any enemy of WWASP
must be a good guy and, therefore, any enemy of WWASPs enemy must be their friend. But that is a fatal mistake, both in logic and in consequence.
I don't think we see eye to eye on very much, Lee. Of course, I have to assume what you think about anything because you won't say. What do you know about how PURE determines that programs are non-abusive and that the kid actually needs treatment at all, far less that particular program? Please don't pretend to not know. If you don't know, you probably should not lend your name to their promotional website.
While you are posting on fornits, trying to figure out the ?w vs. p?, trashing others?I?ll continue to make my contribution to exposing child abuse as well?just not in your fashion or with people you approve of.
And I'm sure you're thoroughly convinced that this justifies any kind of cruelty or injury to a perceived enemy. Got it. Been there. Fought through the courts to get back to the more commonly accepted reality. Never regretted it.
I believe in free speech as well?but have learned over the years that you?d better be conversing with people of your own beliefs, otherwise when you piss someone off, it?s slander. Just my opinion!!!
Or, to put it more simply, you believe in freedom of speech of which you approve. You're not a defendant in this suit, Lee. You're a cheerleader for the plaintiff. Remember? Nobody's sued me to shut up your foul mouth cause you only piss off free thinkers, not control freaks. As they say, birds of a feather stick together. But there's
always a pecking order!
One day this will all come to past, hopefully for both of our sakes, real soon.
If you take the time & look back in all of you IP?s, you can confirm mine! You can verify my info personally, instead of guessing & spewing?
I'm guessing? Or did you just pretty well cop to understanding just exactly what I said, then just pretending to take offense over the faux accusaion of "they" being hackers. :rofl:
Ya' know, I could clear this up. I could just asign all the anon posts the username "Resident Whine Steward" and see if anyone thinks that's not appropriate. Or you could just claim them yourself, but that would take some considerable sack.
Just my honest opinion?you can catch more bees with honey, than you can with shit!!!
Yes. That's why you have never received and invitation to mine and Carey's blanket party. It was not an oversight, but shit stinks! Sorry. I wouldn't bring it up but... well, I'm trying to be kind.
Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys
--P.J. O'Rourke
_________________
Ginger Warbis ~ Antigen
American drug war P.O.W.
10/80 - 10/82
Straight South (Sarasota, FL)
Anonymity Anonymous[ This Message was edited by: Antigen on 2004-01-01 21:15 ]