« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Author Topic: Preliminary Injunction  (Read 7549 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline turbinekat

  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #30 on: January 02, 2004, 01:16:00 PM »
Girls,

Have you figured out why you only have been given the wwasp's side of the documents?  Just look at your list you refered to in the last post...

I wonder why "they" didn't give you any of "their" depositions?  Why the onesided affair?  So you could tell "their" story for them?

Just a thought...

Kindest Regards,

Lee

[ This Message was edited by: turbinekat on 2004-01-02 10:20 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #31 on: January 02, 2004, 01:49:00 PM »
I have more depositions than you think.  I promise.  Like I have already said, there are others in your camp who see what is going on.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline turbinekat

  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #32 on: January 02, 2004, 01:55:00 PM »
Carey,

What camp are you referring to?  I have a beef with an organization & I'm taking care of it...your bull-shit accusations are becoming tiresome.

Stick to YOUR problems & quit worrying about what I do.

Regards,

Lee
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline turbinekat

  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #33 on: January 02, 2004, 01:59:00 PM »
Carey,

Post ALL of them & not just the ones that you chose...then let people make a decision.  Don't make one for them or taint the issues with YOUR problems or what you chose to expose.  Now you are guilty of what you are accusing others of!  Let others be the judge, not just you & Ginger.

Regards,

Lee
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #34 on: January 02, 2004, 02:03:00 PM »
Quote
I wonder why "they" didn't give you any of "their" depositions? Why the onesided affair? So you could tell "their" story for them?


"Your Camp" - I was addressing the "they."


What problem?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline turbinekat

  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #35 on: January 02, 2004, 02:06:00 PM »
Carey,

Like I said; "I don't have a camp, contrary to your beliefs."

Problems...just a comment to life's problems in general.  Nothing specific.

Regards,

Lee
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #36 on: January 02, 2004, 02:14:00 PM »
Get your buddy to post them for you.  I am sure she has copies.  I am not tainting any issue. I am telling what is relevent to my beefs with PURE and Sue.  The other depositions I have at this point don't have anything to do with what PURE has and is doing.

What ever is in those other depositions has nothing to do with what Sue is all about. So if you want them posted you get them from the one that you support...Sue and PURE, Inc. and you post them.

[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2004-01-02 11:15 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2004-01-02 11:19 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline turbinekat

  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #37 on: January 02, 2004, 02:18:00 PM »
Carey,

Just as I expected...you either don't have the other docs...or you don't want everyone to see for their selves.  Which is it?

Regards,

Lee
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #38 on: January 02, 2004, 02:22:00 PM »
Nice try, but it is not going to work.  You just can squeeze hard enough, you poor dear.  I know squeeze your buddy.  Get them from her and post them.  Then make your case.  Just don't ask me to make your case for you...that's being lazy.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline turbinekat

  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #39 on: January 02, 2004, 02:31:00 PM »
Carey,

I don't need a case, contrary to your comments.  Like you said before evidence is evidence...hell if you don't have it I understand.  But not posting it is another story!

BTW; I ain't a poor dear.  If memory serves me correctly, I haven't sold wwasp's anything.  Nor will I.  OTOH; you let them rent your PC, didn't you?   Guess they coudn't afford to buy one similar to your super PC with their fortunes.

You already made the comment that you had the info.  Just to lazy to post it or affraid someone will find out the truth.  Now which is it?

Regards,

Lee
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #40 on: January 02, 2004, 03:02:00 PM »
What's the matter Lee, Sue does not share everything with you?  I mean gosh, why do you need what I have.  I would think Sue would be more than willing to share all of the documents with you.  I would think she would want you to make an informed decision.  I guess, from what you are telling me, she's not.  Doesn't that tell you something? does it tell you anything?

Lee, when you are ready to go after "program abuse" instead of protecting Sue...let me know.  

[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2004-01-02 12:05 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline turbinekat

  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #41 on: January 02, 2004, 03:16:00 PM »
When & where have I protected anyone?  Please advice...Where is it listed or when did you conclude my information comes from others?  I get my own information...that I need.  I could care a less what you have or anyone else for that matter.  I just find it ironic that you are proceeding like the others before you & not giving the public ALL of the information!  That's it!!!

You exposing "child abuse"...what are you going to do?  Loan me the dirty money wwasp's paid for renting a PC?  Don't think so!!!

Carey, I've been doing this for awhile longer than you have.  I currently do not need any help from any passer byers.  I'm in this for the long haul, always have been, always will be.  I can investigate MY complaints all by myself.  Thanks for the offer though.

Kindest Regards,

Lee
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #42 on: January 02, 2004, 03:23:00 PM »
Personally, I'd like someone to post the WWASPS v. PURE preliminary injunction court order.  Any chance Mr. Colburn can oblige us with this request?

 :nworthy:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline turbinekat

  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #43 on: January 02, 2004, 03:58:00 PM »
Sorry, anon. other than what's posted out on the net, I am privy to the same info you have.

Regards,

Lee
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #44 on: January 02, 2004, 04:07:00 PM »
Lee, Question -

Your kid was in a wwasp program,  was not abused, and chose out of the school at 18.  What is your beef other than your kid didn't look like you wanted and you want someone to blame?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »