« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: Preliminary Injunction  (Read 7557 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2003, 01:27:00 PM »
Yoo-hoo ... anybody home?  Not too worry, PACER is open 24/7/365 and sooner or later, somebody will log on to retrieve the document in question, which by the way, is in the public record for a reason.  This is America.

 :wave:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2003, 03:27:00 PM »
Carey, can you retrieve the preliminary injunction court order from the PACER service? Not the motion, which Ginger already has, but the document, itself, which would explain why the judge ruled as he did and the purpose of the injunction?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #17 on: December 21, 2003, 09:21:00 PM »
Quote
Carey, can you retrieve the preliminary injunction court order from the PACER service?


I have printed quite a few documents.  I am not exactly sure which one is the court order.

Let me tell you what I have.

I have Jeff's deposition.
Sue's deposition.
Cross Creek v. Paula Reeves.
Christer v. Christer
WWASP v. PURE,, Inc et al

There are hundreds of pages.  The injunction court order could be in here and I just have not gotten to it yet.

I have a document titled "Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction."

I can't find a "court order."  I will keep looking.

Ginger, can I fax some of these documents to you for you to post?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #18 on: December 22, 2003, 07:23:00 AM »
Carey, I don't currently have fax capability. I'm sure, though, that PACER delivers those docs in PDF format. If you haven't got them saved on your computer already, I would think you'd be able to access them again, since you've already paid for the access. Since it's a huge number of docs, I'll set up some space on my server where you can dump them and I'll walk you through the process.

If All it takes is an infinite number of monkeys with type writers, then how come there's no Shakespeare coming out of AOL?
-- Anonymous

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #19 on: December 23, 2003, 12:26:00 PM »
Excerpted from the WWASPS v. PURE lawsuit thread:

http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?topic=3486&forum=9

7/30/03 Docket Entry #90 Minute entry: Court rules GRANTING/DENYING in part World Wide Assn's motion for preliminary injunction against Ms. Scheff and Pure [58-1],Judge: Paul Cassell Court Reporter: Pam Smith Court Deputy: Trisha Little (tl) [Entry date 07/31/03]

------------------------------------------------

Docket #90 Judge's Order
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #20 on: December 23, 2003, 07:14:00 PM »
Quote
On 2003-12-23 09:26:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Excerpted from the WWASPS v. PURE lawsuit thread:



http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?topic=3486&forum=9



7/30/03 Docket Entry #90 Minute entry: Court rules GRANTING/DENYING in part World Wide Assn's motion for preliminary injunction against Ms. Scheff and Pure [58-1],Judge: Paul Cassell Court Reporter: Pam Smith Court Deputy: Trisha Little (tl) [Entry date 07/31/03]



------------------------------------------------



Docket #90 Judge's Order"


This is just a summary.  The document #90 would be the one to read if one is interested in details regarding the judge's ruling.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #21 on: December 23, 2003, 09:40:00 PM »
Ginger,

You may want to consider the information Carey provides could be personal and not needed on this Forum.

We already know she sells her soul cheap.

Carey is walking on thin ice. Don't go under with her.

YOU Ginger should be smarter than that.

You're trading your integrity to the wwaspies.

Just because you can doesnt mean you should.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #22 on: December 23, 2003, 10:06:00 PM »
We're talking about posting legal filings, which are in the public domain. Nothing personal, get it? Public domain documents of record.

I'd like to see them. Several people are giving contradictory accounts of what the lawsuit is about. The surest way to clear it up is to let us all see for ourselves what is actually in these documents. I don't really have enough interest in WvP to pay for the docs. I figure the parties most interested probably already have copies and if they want the truth told about it, why of course they'll share their copies, right?

I just want everbody who's demanding that we believe this and that about this suit to either put up or shut up. I don't see how that damages my integrity at all.

Has it occured to you that maybe you are not getting the whole story?

Those who control the past, control the future; and those who control the present, control the past.

--George Orwell

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #23 on: December 23, 2003, 10:17:00 PM »
Ginger,  


The WWASPIES are USING YOU.

USING your forum to distract from their mistreatment of kids.

You're falling for it.

Just because you can doesnt mean you should.

Happy Holidays  GOOD WILL TOWARD ALL MEN.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #24 on: December 23, 2003, 10:36:00 PM »
Well, they may be trying. But they're not getting very far.

See http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?So ... 65&forum=9

It's clear to me that PURE has been using some ppl to try and distract from their abusing troubled parents and their children.
I sure hope ya'll get that figured out pretty soon.

I don't go lookin' for trouble. I just keep a little in a box should someone come by who is.
--Bill Warbis



_________________
Ginger Warbis ~ Antigen
American drug war P.O.W.
   10/80 - 10/82
Straight South (Sarasota, FL)
Anonymity Anonymous

[ This Message was edited by: Antigen on 2003-12-23 19:37 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #25 on: December 24, 2003, 12:29:00 AM »
Check out the little whistle in the bottom right hand corner of this post on Struggling Teens.

http://www.strugglingteens.com/cgi-bin/ ... p=1#000000

Now some people (ANON) may think "reporting a post" is a fine idea.  Me?  I think not. What
say you, Anon?  Should ppl report Mrs. D.VA's post to Jena,the moderator of Struggling Teens?
On what grounds?

 :roll:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #26 on: December 24, 2003, 09:30:00 AM »
Ginger  


For a bright girl,you miss the point.Obviously you are not open to hear it.

Get over the pure hurdle and see the bigger picture.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #27 on: December 24, 2003, 10:35:00 AM »
It's impossible for me to tell which anon you are. So many posters use the same proxy.

Are you the same anon who said
"The WWASPIES are USING YOU.

USING your forum to distract from their mistreatment of kids"

???

If so, well please don't fall for it. Go right ahead and discuss the mistreatment of kids. Feel free to start anytime or just join the rest of us in this thread:
http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?So ... 65&forum=9

or in another thread that interests you. There's one in the KIDS forum, topic heading "A message from a sibling", or something to that effect. Some anon over there wanted to know more about long term effects on families and several ppl have given some good insight.

If you want me to get your point, come right out and state it. Quit hinting around. I flunked long distance mind reading.

Everything that people say to you is personal. Whether it is constructive criticism or not will determine whether it cam from and asshole or not.

----Bill Warbis

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #28 on: December 24, 2003, 11:07:00 AM »
Quote
On 2003-12-24 06:30:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Ginger  





For a bright girl,you miss the point.Obviously you are not open to hear it.



Get over the pure hurdle and see the bigger picture."


Anon, is there something in this document (the preliminary injunction) that troubles you?  Like Ginger says, be specific.  

 :silly:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Preliminary Injunction
« Reply #29 on: December 25, 2003, 01:58:00 AM »
Okay, don't be specific.  Silence is golden, right?

 :wave:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »