Candid Camera on Carey

[Carey]

Defamation of character?  Who's been calling who all sorts of names?  I have not done anything except tell what the hell has been going on.  

You can serve me where ever you please.

[Anonymous]

As you stated Carey, what you have done is not a crime.  This will be a civil case partially on you being liable for invasion of privacy of several people. The other things will be listed in the papers for you to read when you are served.
Ginger, Why do you assume the two names you mentioned are the ones suing Carey?  Do you think there is a cause of action there?  I sure do.  However, I am not confirming nor denying they will be part of this civil suit.

[Anonymous]

I don't think calling names amounts to the same thing as defamation.
And Carey old girl, you are what you are - simple as that. You are wwasps' whore. You made yourself so.
Nothing wrong with what you did? You, even you, can not really believe that.
If it wasn't wrong, why weren't you bosting about it? Instead, you had to be screwed to the wall to get the least bit of admission from you.
If you yourself don't know dam good and well what you've done is dispicable, then why weren't you shouting it out and telling everyone to join you in your openess and honesty?
You are one very sick and very selfish soul; and your very narrow view is going to get you blindsided.
I wonder just how low you'll have to be brought before you'll realize how sick you are and get help.
I've told you before. You don't have to be so angry and hateful and misserable if you don't want to be.

[Froderik]

Thank you Anon! Very well said.  :grin:

[Carey]

If it wasn't wrong, why weren't you bosting about it? Instead, you had to be screwed to the wall to get the least bit of admission from you.
If you yourself don't know dam good and well what you've done is dispicable, then why weren't you shouting it out and telling everyone to join you in your openess and honesty?

What in the hell are you talking about?  Shout what out?  How do you expect me to address what ever it is you are talking about if you can't be more specific?  Your accusations against me are...?

[Anonymous]

Whoa Carey Girl!!!  Looks like you have shit in your mess kit so to speak.  Got alot of people real pissed off at you....Including me you ignorant ass!  I can't wait to see your sorry ass drug through court and witness the look on your face when you face those people you stabbed in the back.  Those same people who were rooting you on and helping you when you went to pick your son's up.  The people whose e-mails that you turned over to wwasp (7,000) to be exact did not have a damned thing to do with your court appearance and keeping your son's from going back to a WWASP facility.  You were hammering the Mother of a rape victim to come forward.  What did that have to do with the rest of us Carey?  I only saw encouragement and compassion from those people that you turned over to WWASP.  You are always spouting off about the "TRUTH" well now darlin you better be prepared to prove "EVERY" frigging remark that you have ever made about "ANYONE". :skull:

[Anonymous]

Well said anon.  Of that 7000 you mentioned, I bet we have another 7000 with Carey's name on them.  Honesty, Carey, you preach but don't use.  You are sick.

[Anonymous]

You ask what you are being accused of in this law suit.  I will share a few of the things (not all, I don't want to spoil the surprise)
1) Liable
2) Slander
3) Defamation
4) Invasion of Privacy
5) Intentional Infliction of Pain

If you think this is a joke, think again.  Of the 7000 emails, you gave WWASP, your name is on them too.  Claiming bankruptcy won't help.  Judgements for Civil Actions due to Malice will not be erased.  You will live with the judgement until you settle it.  Try to get a loan, refinance or even apply for a job.

Ask your attorney if these people have cause of action.  Wait, the next knock will be on your door, serving you.  

You feel you can turn over any email that is written as PERSONAL.  Lets say you wrote your close friend (if you had one) an email saying you had contracted STD.  (again, this is just an example)  Then your friend gets pissed at you, the letter is her property so she shares it with the Internet World.  How would that feel?  If it could be proven she had personal reasons to do this, there goes another law suit.  

You keep saying you just want to tell the whole story.  Nobody gives a shitt about your story anymore.  You lost all accountability with everyone when you turned over all the email to WWASP. You had your 15 minutes of fame, give it up, you are old news.  You will become new news once you are served.  Incidently, don't be surprised if WWASP has listed your name in this law suit, I have heard they have done just this.  You are putting your trust in the devil.

[Antigen]

On 2003-11-16 16:27:00, Anonymous wrote:


Ginger, Why do you assume the two names you mentioned are the ones suing Carey?  Do you think there is a cause of action there?  I sure do.  However, I am not confirming nor denying they will be part of this civil suit."

Because, in my experience, everybody who wants us all to hate Carey has been somehow affiliated with PURE.

BTW, when's Huron supposed to file? That's the case I'm really interested. WvP is nothing but insider sniping over inmate brokering. What about the class action against WWASP on behalf of the injured victims? Anyone got any word on that?

Hear me people: We now have to deal with another race - small and feeble when our fathers first met them, but now great and overbearing. Strangely enough they have a mind to till the soil and the love of possessions is a disease with them. These people have made many rules which the rich may break but the poor may not. They take their tithes from the poor and weak to support the rich and those who rule.
http://www.powersource.com/gallery/people/sittbull.html' target='_new'>Chief Sitting Bull, speaking at the Powder River Conference, 1877

[Anonymous]

The civil suit I was referring to is not Huron's.  It is another one which is against Carey, not WWASP.  It will be a reality, Ginger.  

As far as Huron, I don't keep up with that.  I am part of the law suit against Carey, not with Huron.

[Antigen]

So then I guess I should take that as "Hell no! We don't give a flying run at a rollin' doughnut about any stupid class action on behalf of the kids! All we care about is revenge against Carey!"

Is that inaccurate?

BTW, this is why I don't try to control the dialog around here. There are plenty of places on the net for controled, focused discussion. This is something different. This is a free-for-all where nobody's hiding nothing from noooo body!

Reminds me of an old Irish prayer.
Dear Lord, bless the people who are nice to us and keep them well. And those who are mean to us, please turn their hearts and bless them too. And those who's hearts won't turn, please twist their feet so we'll know them when we see them coming.

Let the reader decide what to make of any of it. I'm just a tech. They don't pay me enough to think for you.

Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so.
Anonymity Anonymous

[Anonymous]

Ginger, I did not say that at all.  You are asking the wrong person about Huron, is what I said.  Sue Scheff, I have heard communicates with them daily.  I don't.  That is all I was saying.  Ask her.  If I didn't care about the kids, could I be named in a law suit?  Think about it.

[Froderik]

What in the hell are you talking about? Shout what out? How do you expect me to address what ever it is you are talking about if you can't be more specific? Your accusations against me are...?

Carey, This is YET ANOTHER instance of your Tar Baby Syndrome. Either that, or you're just really, really, really thick-headed. Gee...I wonder what anon could have POSSIBLY been referring to here... :flame:  :skull:

[Antigen]

On 2003-11-16 18:44:00, Anonymous wrote:

"If I didn't care about the kids, could I be named in a law suit?  Think about it."

Oh, absolutely! And why not? The suit is not about spreading news clippings and court documents to support the truth about WWASP. The lawsuit is about trademark infringement for the purpose of poaching business from their (your?) competition. For all I know, you folks went just as far over the top in your good fight against WWASP as you have against Carey right here on my server. And you're worried about her credibility???

Your argument seems to be based on a bad case of higher purpose complicated by a distinctly possible martyrdome syndrome. Anyone who does not accept your high holy purpose as an article of unquestioned faith must, therefore, be working for the enemy?

Gimme a break, man! Really. I had about enough of this gig over 20 years ago!

Web pages are like babies -- creation involves a level of enthusiasm that does not necessarily carry over into maintenance.
--Joe Chew

[Anonymous]

Sorry, Ginger, you are wrong.  I am not in the business and if you were a survivor that cared about the others in there, you wouldn't support someone like Carey.  Give me a break, I don't even care to hear your story.  I have heard it and it obviously didn't affect you enough to care what is still going on.  You support someone who has put kids in jeopardy.  I don't place kids, recomend placing kids or anything of that sort.  You are so bitter and are using it against the wrong people.  Try some of that bitterness on Carey.  How would you like to still be in a Straight program and have someone like Carey jeopardizing everyones effort to have you removed?  Or do you not care anymore?  I have cut you slack on your stupid slander because you are a survivor, but, you obviously don't care about the kids still in there.