I think the insinuation here is that, if the media got a detail wrong, then the whole story must be untrue.
Never mind that journalists almost
always get something wrong or misunderstand. If you want badly enough to believe that the truth is a lie (as in the case of someone who's come to depend for their own self esteem on the idea that to trust the program makes them good parents and to question the program makes them bad parents) that's all the evidence you need.
Know what I think? More than likely, there is no written or unwritten policy involving hitting or beating anyone as such. However, it must happen at least once in awhile. How else does the staff make a kid hold to a painful and unhealthy physical position against their will? Ask them in a more stern voice? Ground them? Take away their car keys? Of course not, they physically force them to do it. And if the kid fights back? Well, given all the facts as we know them, it's hard for me to imagine a scenareo that does not include beatings of some sort.
But you're right. Beatings are not the only form of abuse. IMO, not even the worst.
The college idealists who fill the ranks of the environmental movement seem willing to do absolutely anything to save the biosphere, except take science courses and learn something about it.
--P.J. O'Rourke