Author Topic: Not all program kids are innocent  (Read 4430 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Maximilian

  • Posts: 341
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Not all program kids are innocent
« on: September 09, 2010, 01:50:25 PM »
Quote from: "Joel"
Quote from: "Evil WWASP"
Hello again. Im gonna repost what I wrote on another thread, In view of that youre solidifying rules and that I feel there is a necessity to perserve the right to "name names" in some regards, even while ending the right to "name names" in other frameworks . What che's referencing illustrates the kind of posting of personal info that should not be tolerated (i dont know the whole background, but obviously it's done for reasons that are not related to teen abuse but for unreasonable "flame war" concerns)


Quote from: "Che Gookin"
Since we are all up in arms about making this place a better place could you start here:

viewtopic.php?f=22&t=29840&start=1515

You'll notice mr. babble tits posted Felice's personal records on an open forum. I'd like them deleted and him warned. Do so quickly please or this entire thing is going to end up a sham.

On the other hand there are times we should have the right to "name names"...
Quote from: "evil wwasp"
I see your points. The problem I see there is then we couldn't link to "free so and so campaigns" and such. We couldn't even post names of teens who commit suicide post incarceration or in program. Should fornits administrators really demand posters be "secret keepers," not able to even link to identities’ intricate in this abomination and bury their terrible secret knowledge? I appreciate that it is embarrassing to be exposed as a child abuser for former staff(Joel), I appreciate it is embarrassing for program parents to be exposed as criminals, I appreciate that, in the pile case, that maybe everyone involved wanted what was transpiring to be done secretly. But I don't see why that's fornits posters' burden of secrets to carry...at least not to the point they can't even link to another site about it


The name isn't the issue rather what people do with telephone numbers and addresses etc [where moderation comes into play].  Tony and Angela Smith methods were cruel in my humble opinion but that's the nature of the beast.  There was a telephone number of a family member linked.  Angela Smith's claims were false.  You are entitled to your opinion I am an abuser; I will pay you proper respects.  You believe children have the right to "out " staffers and I agree with you.  Do I have the right, as a former staffer, to question survivors who "claim" they were sent to programs for something small?  There are some survivors, IMHO, who play the child abuser card for wrong reasons.  


All kids sent to programs are innocent, ask any fornits poster.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2010, 04:16:28 PM by Maximilian »

Offline Anne Bonney

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5006
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Fornits Constitution
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2010, 01:54:33 PM »
Quote from: "Maximilian"

All kids sent to programs are innocent, ask any fornits poster.


Innocent or not, they don't deserve to be abused and it certainly doesn't help them if they are 'troubled'.  The fact is that the kid has no due process, so yes...a lot of "innocent" kids do end up in programs.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
traight, St. Pete, early 80s
AA is a cult http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-cult.html

The more boring a child is, the more the parents, when showing off the child, receive adulation for being good parents-- because they have a tame child-creature in their house.  ~~  Frank Zappa

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: New Fornits Constitution
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2010, 01:56:10 PM »
Quote from: "Joel"
The name isn't the issue rather what people do with telephone numbers and addresses etc [where moderation comes into play].  Tony and Angela Smith methods were cruel in my humble opinion but that's the nature of the beast.  There was a telephone number of a family member linked.  Angela Smith's claims were false.  You are entitled to your opinion I am an abuser; I will pay you proper respects.  You believe children have the right to "out " staffers and I agree with you.  Do I have the right, as a former staffer, to question survivors who "claim" they were sent to programs for something small?  There are some survivors, IMHO, who play the child abuser card for wrong reasons.  
Of course you have a right to ask any questions whatsoever.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2010, 01:57:21 PM »
Wait a sec...  You had said none of the enforcement was going to be retroactive and a whole thread was just retroactively nuked.  What's up with that?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Maximilian

  • Posts: 341
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Fornits Constitution
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2010, 01:58:04 PM »
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "Maximilian"

All kids sent to programs are innocent, ask any fornits poster.


Innocent or not, they don't deserve to be abused and it certainly doesn't help them if they are 'troubled'.  The fact is that the kid has no due process, so yes...a lot of "innocent" kids do end up in programs.

Just like prisons are full of innocent people, when you ask them why they are in jail. I was never abused in a program, and I was very troubled and needed the help. I also lied about the reasons why I was there, and acted like I had no idea, and I was the victim. That's was just a pity me act to manipulate people, though.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2010, 01:58:28 PM »
Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction"
Wait a sec...  You had said none of the enforcement was going to be retroactive and a whole thread was just retroactively nuked.  What's up with that?
It wasn't nuked.  You'll find it in Open Free For All.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Fornits Constitution
« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2010, 02:02:42 PM »
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "Maximilian"

All kids sent to programs are innocent, ask any fornits poster.


Innocent or not, they don't deserve to be abused and it certainly doesn't help them if they are 'troubled'.  The fact is that the kid has no due process, so yes...a lot of "innocent" kids do end up in programs.

Just like prisons are full of innocent people, when you ask them why they are in jail. I was never abused in a program, and I was very troubled and needed the help. I also lied about the reasons why I was there, and acted like I had no idea, and I was the victim. That's was just a pity me act to manipulate people, though.

 :blabla:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anne Bonney

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5006
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Fornits Constitution
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2010, 02:11:30 PM »
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "Maximilian"

All kids sent to programs are innocent, ask any fornits poster.


Innocent or not, they don't deserve to be abused and it certainly doesn't help them if they are 'troubled'.  The fact is that the kid has no due process, so yes...a lot of "innocent" kids do end up in programs.

Just like prisons are full of innocent people, when you ask them why they are in jail. I was never abused in a program, and I was very troubled and needed the help. I also lied about the reasons why I was there, and acted like I had no idea, and I was the victim. That's was just a pity me act to manipulate people, though.

That doesn't address in any way what I said.  Would you like to try again?  Whether or not a kid is "innocent" has no bearing on their right to not be abused.  If a kid does have "issues", placing them into an abusive program isn't going to help.  Again, the fact is that a kid who's parents are considering sending them to one of the though-reform camps doesn't have any due process, so yes, many "innocent" kids do end up in abusive programs.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
traight, St. Pete, early 80s
AA is a cult http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-cult.html

The more boring a child is, the more the parents, when showing off the child, receive adulation for being good parents-- because they have a tame child-creature in their house.  ~~  Frank Zappa

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: New Fornits Constitution
« Reply #8 on: September 09, 2010, 02:13:28 PM »
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Just like prisons are full of innocent people, when you ask them why they are in jail.

Sure, but there just like there are innocent people in jail, there are innocent kids in program.  In my mind, the fact that the never had any sort of due process prior to imprisonment makes all the kids innocent (until proven guilty).
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
so-called innocence in jail vs. in program
« Reply #9 on: September 09, 2010, 02:27:54 PM »
Quote from: "psy"
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Just like prisons are full of innocent people, when you ask them why they are in jail.
Sure, but there just like there are innocent people in jail, there are innocent kids in program.  In my mind, the fact that the never had any sort of due process prior to imprisonment makes all the kids innocent (until proven guilty).
Actually, there are far fewer so-called innocent people in jail than there are in programs. Both convicted criminals as well as merely charged suspects do have some protection via the legal system, although it is far from perfect.

Not so in the TTI, which is more based on marketing propaganda, exploiting and manipulating parents' perceived and perhaps reinterpreted comfort levels, than it is on any objective or common sense assessment of facts, deeds, and psychological states.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Maximilian

  • Posts: 341
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Innocence or guilt of Program Kids
« Reply #10 on: September 09, 2010, 02:28:19 PM »
Oh great! Our own new topic (I didn't start this topic, it was ripped from another thread by an admin and started on my behalf), I suppose this topic must of been deemed worthy by our overlords. Is froderik's bla bla bla image an insult though?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Maximilian

  • Posts: 341
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Fornits Constitution
« Reply #11 on: September 09, 2010, 02:35:02 PM »
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "Maximilian"

All kids sent to programs are innocent, ask any fornits poster.


Innocent or not, they don't deserve to be abused and it certainly doesn't help them if they are 'troubled'.  The fact is that the kid has no due process, so yes...a lot of "innocent" kids do end up in programs.

Just like prisons are full of innocent people, when you ask them why they are in jail. I was never abused in a program, and I was very troubled and needed the help. I also lied about the reasons why I was there, and acted like I had no idea, and I was the victim. That's was just a pity me act to manipulate people, though.

That doesn't address in any way what I said.  Would you like to try again?  Whether or not a kid is "innocent" has no bearing on their right to not be abused.  If a kid does have "issues", placing them into an abusive program isn't going to help.  Again, the fact is that a kid who's parents are considering sending them to one of the though-reform camps doesn't have any due process, so yes, many "innocent" kids do end up in abusive programs.

Well I can only speak for myself, I don't have the ability to channel other people's experiences and speak for them, as you seem adept at doing. If you are going by what other kids told you in the program, or even after it, I am simply making a point that I lied to everybody about the real reasons I was sent away, to make myself appear as the victim. If I'm being completely honest then I would have to explain all the bad things I did to end up in a program, and that might make programs look less bad, and I might appear that I actually needed or deserved a strict program. I was not innocent, and I had issues and I wasn't abused, that's my story. I'm kind of curious though, do you consider every single program abusive? I find it hard to believe every program in existence today is equivalent to the one you went to decades ago. Do you think all kids are abused in wilderness programs today? What about Benchmark, what do you find abusive about that adult facility?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Innocence or guilt of Program Kids
« Reply #12 on: September 09, 2010, 02:37:30 PM »
Regardless of so-called innocence or guilt, I think Anne's points are the more important ones:

  • Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
    Whether or not a kid is "innocent" has no bearing on their right to not be abused.
  • Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
    If a kid does have "issues", placing them into an abusive program isn't going to help.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline shaggys

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 346
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Innocence or guilt of Program Kids
« Reply #13 on: September 09, 2010, 02:41:45 PM »
I had smoked some pot and drank some beer before being placed in Straight inc. I was 15 and was pretty "innocent" I guess. Many things were going on in my life that my parents didn't want to take responsibility for. My parents had recently divorced at that time. Mother had gotten remarried to an asshole with 3 kids of his own now hanging around the house i grew up in. I had been shifted from school to school for 4 years previously and despite that was usually an A student. BTW the shifting school situation was not due to anything on my part. My parents lived in different districts and we tried a couple of private schools before my parents decided they couldn't afford them and put me back in public school. Well I landed 10th grade in a school I fuckin hated and started looking for somewhere to fit in. Within a short period of time I was hangin with the "hoods" as we were called then. Yes I was smokin weed, had a few beers and started making bad grades. Parents, if your kids are doing this They Do Not Need A Program! You need to do your job and stop looking for somebody else to take the responsibility off your hands. Sending a kid to a program for this type of behavior is like fighting fire with Nuclear Weapons. Yeah I think there are plenty of "innocent" kids in programs right now. Plenty.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anne Bonney

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5006
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Innocence or guilt of Program Kids
« Reply #14 on: September 09, 2010, 03:12:29 PM »
Quote from: "Ursus"
Regardless of so-called innocence or guilt, I think Anne's points are the more important ones:

  • Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
    Whether or not a kid is "innocent" has no bearing on their right to not be abused.
  • Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
    If a kid does have "issues", placing them into an abusive program isn't going to help.


Thank you!!!  It seems Max-IT always manages to conveniently overlook the salient points.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
traight, St. Pete, early 80s
AA is a cult http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-cult.html

The more boring a child is, the more the parents, when showing off the child, receive adulation for being good parents-- because they have a tame child-creature in their house.  ~~  Frank Zappa