Well, that's not exactly true. I've had quite a few people contact me off the boards after reading thru the Orange Papers stuff that I've posted and thanked me for releasing them from the groupthink. But I suspect you won't believe that, just as Danny didn't believe that I spent last (not this) weekend helping someone who's sponsor told them to go off their anti-depressants cold turkey and that "god would take care of it".
And I'm still waiting to find out why you consider 'mainstream' to equal good/right/correct.
Well to be fair, AA is mainstream in comparison to fornits, but the most mainstream thing is to use alcohol. Being part of AA, and then trying to go out with your old friends who all drink can quickly make you feel like an outsider. This is the reason become a part of AA, and make new friends. So in that sense, I think drinking culture is actually the most mainstream idea out there in relation to alcohol. It's generally accepted to get drunk every weekend, probably even more so than staying completely sober and doing other things. When you go to a party or a wedding and everybody is drinking, and you say no thanks I don't drink, you do get some strange looks sometimes. So you're right, what is mainstream might not necessarily be a better path. This thread was not about whether AA is ethical or unethical , it's about whether a small group of anti treatment extremists (and yes the views here are extreme) calling a large organization like AA a cult, is not an example of the pot calling the kettle black.
As far as sponsors go, I'm not here to defend the individual actions of every person who has been a part of AA. If somebody tells you to go off medication, and you think it helps then they might want to find a new sponsor. Or maybe they will avoid AA altogether and find sobriety through medication/therapy/psychiatry. To each their own. Personally, I prefer AA to psychiatry, but I wouldn't pressure someone who felt the other way around to change their mind. You said you tried out different AA groups, did they attempt to force you to come to meetings when you decided it didn't work for you? I doubt it. It obviously works for a lot of people though, judging by the amount of meetings going on everyday. Just like psychiatry seems to work for a lot of people, judging by the amount of pharmaceutical advertisements in all forms of media. People are free to choose what works for them.