Author Topic: High Impact  (Read 13300 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #90 on: September 29, 2003, 05:56:00 PM »
Carey - if you have a quesiton for Karen or want to continue this, email her privately. WE DONT CARE  TO LISTEN TO YOU.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #91 on: September 29, 2003, 06:03:00 PM »
Quote
WE DONT CARE TO LISTEN TO YOU


Who is we?  You and the Queen of England?  You and your PURE buddies?  Who?  You and all of the other ANONs?  Oh excuse me, I meant to say the other ANON's who think like you think, those who agree with you. Who is WE?

By the way, what is productive?  Is productive what you define it to be?  

Right, Anon, you make the rules. NOT!  :cry2:  :cry2:

Remember Sue told me once "I can't control your amendment rights, but I do control what is spread on the list."  Thank goodness for Fornets!!!!  Antigen does believe in my amendment rights!!!

I love Fornets and I love America!!!!  Don't you?


[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2003-09-29 15:10 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2003-09-29 15:12 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2003-09-29 15:13 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #92 on: September 29, 2003, 06:56:00 PM »
Quote
On 2003-09-29 14:48:00, KarenZ wrote:

"It is annoying the way she butts in every link and harps on with her paranoid fantasies.

Some one asked what any of this has to do with High Impact - not a dam thing.

She does this on every link I start or post on much. It is an aggravation.

Theres no good way to handle her either - ignore her and she gets rabid; try and respond and she gets rabid.



I began this link b/c there had been some question about weather or not wwasp operated High Impact.

I didn't intend for it go off into all this crap, again.

I guess my fear is, if I just ignore her, there will be people who don't know the history and who might be mislead by her harping. As I said, ignoring her doesn?t stop her - she just gets more and more hysterical.



I do think its a shame she is allowed to detract and distract from the efforts of so many  - not just myself. She is nothing but a negative force anymore, and has long since ceased to have anything positive to add.



All this is b/c she thinks I am lying about how long Jane told me it would take to graduate - Or, she is trying to prove me stupid for not understanding the contract.



And notice how she is harping on about this  question she feels I ought to answer; All the while ignoring several pointed questions ask of her.  

No doubt, she finds nothing odd in this; b/c after all, I'm just some stupid post program parent; while she is the perfect, infallible, untainted guardian of Truth; Clearly my (and everyone's) superior. We all owe her whatever she wants - while we can never expect she'd have anything to answer for.



These people are always a pain in the ass, and there is seldom anything to be done about it.

"


Karen, who is Jane? Also, you have said you found the program for your son through Lon's website.  Can you please be more specific.  e.g. Did you post asking for info?  Did you buy his book? What was your reaction when you first learned of the controversy surrounding this organization?  The Intrepid Net Reporter (original one) was online since 1998.  Didn't you ever check that website out?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #93 on: September 29, 2003, 07:11:00 PM »
Curious how many parents pulled their kids from Dundee following it's closure and either placed them in another non-WWASPS program or brought them home v. how many were sent to a different WWASPS program?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #94 on: September 29, 2003, 07:24:00 PM »
Karen,
My suggestion, for what it's worth, is JUST DON"T RESPOND. The majority of posters here know you're story. For the benefit of any new participants, simply reply with a link to your story or one of the hundreds of other posts in which you've already explained an issue. No need to repeat yourself over and over and over. Unless you enjoy jousting with her.
Deborah
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline anon

  • Posts: 267
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #95 on: September 29, 2003, 07:51:00 PM »
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline scottT

  • Posts: 55
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #96 on: September 29, 2003, 08:09:00 PM »
Quote


Karen, answer the question if you dare.  Was it a 12 month contract?  



Quote
if you would pull your head out of your

high-horse's ass for 2 minutes, you would simply read the post from earlier this morning and see that she specifically stated that she signed a 12 months contract.




See, what a dumb ass, she was told her child could graduate in 6 months, yet she signed a 12 month contract.  That tells me she lied.  



Can you show me where that post is, please.

 
Quote


Please refer to Karen's post of 9/28 at 17:44:00.  The reason there is a 4 month liquidated damage clause in the contract is BECAUSE IT WAS A 12 MONTH CONTRACT.  3 MONTH CONTRACTS DON'T HAVE A 4 MONTH EARLY CANCELLATION PENALTY.

What on earth is the point of this discussion?  Are you getting enough oxygen in there?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
am an angry, wrathful man,  put here to step on the toes of those who dance around the truth (ex WWASPers may acknowledge the sarcasm)

Offline scottT

  • Posts: 55
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #97 on: September 29, 2003, 08:10:00 PM »
Quote


Karen, answer the question if you dare.  Was it a 12 month contract?  



Quote
if you would pull your head out of your

high-horse's ass for 2 minutes, you would simply read the post from earlier this morning and see that she specifically stated that she signed a 12 months contract.




See, what a dumb ass, she was told her child could graduate in 6 months, yet she signed a 12 month contract.  That tells me she lied.  



Can you show me where that post is, please.

 
Quote


Dear Carey:

Please refer to Karen's post of 9/28 at 17:44:00.  The reason there is a 4 month liquidated damage clause in the contract is BECAUSE IT WAS A 12 MONTH CONTRACT.  3 MONTH CONTRACTS DON'T HAVE A 4 MONTH EARLY CANCELLATION PENALTY.

What on earth is the point of this discussion?  Are you getting enough oxygen in there?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
am an angry, wrathful man,  put here to step on the toes of those who dance around the truth (ex WWASPers may acknowledge the sarcasm)

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #98 on: September 29, 2003, 08:27:00 PM »
Frankly, it seems Carey is doing more to expose the corruption within this so-called group of anti-WWASPSIES than anyone else and that's a good thing.  Doesn't mean she is PRO-WWASPS because she is putting people like Karen's feet to the fire. After all, these people do tend to color the truth with their own shade of reality as evident by their own words and actions.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline scottT

  • Posts: 55
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #99 on: September 29, 2003, 09:08:00 PM »
And yet,  I for one, thank god for the fact that the strongest evidence of "corruption" that you can come up with against anti-WWASPS parents is that there is an ambiguity concerning whether someone had a 12 month contract or a 3 month contract.  That's a topic of such profound import that you consider it "...having one's feet put  to the fire"???

   B-F-D!!! Get a life.  Maybe you could borrow one from somebody who hasn't been warped by too many parent seminars.

[ This Message was edited by: scottT on 2003-09-29 18:11 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
am an angry, wrathful man,  put here to step on the toes of those who dance around the truth (ex WWASPers may acknowledge the sarcasm)

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #100 on: September 29, 2003, 09:22:00 PM »
Quote
On 2003-09-29 18:08:00, scottT wrote:

"And yet,  I for one, thank god for the fact that the strongest evidence of "corruption" that you can come up with against anti-WWASPS parents is that there is an ambiguity concerning whether someone had a 12 month contract or a 3 month contract.  BFD!!! Get a life -- preferably one that hasn't been warped by too many parent seminars."


Why any parent would sign the rights of their own child away (for 3 months, 6 months, 1 year) is the question NONE of these parents can answer without trying to point the finger of blame at everybody and anybody but themselves, the very people who signed, sealed and delivered their kids into these programs.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #101 on: September 29, 2003, 09:38:00 PM »
Fine.  I sent our son to a program. I didn't investigate as fully as I should have.  I have no one to blame for my lack of diligence but myself.  That's a problem I shall deal with.

On the other hand,  if I had been exposed to the quanta of information that has become available since the Dundee fiasco -- including especially the Fornits site -- I could have avoided being sucked in to the web of lies.

Some folks on this site are of the opinion that you have to be some kind of "virgin" in order to express a valid opinion.  I prefer to believe that any relevant evidence which helps a parent see through the deception is valuable info.  Don't dismiss it just because I lacked the prescience with which you were so abundantly blessed.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #102 on: September 29, 2003, 09:43:00 PM »
Sucked in the web of lies?  What the hell do you think this site is all about?  Very funny :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
High Impact
« Reply #103 on: September 29, 2003, 09:47:00 PM »
Quote
On 2003-09-29 18:43:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Sucked in the web of lies?  What the hell do you think this site is all about?  Very funny :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl: "


What is 8 programs shut down about! You people make me sick! This isn?t about the parents, its about the KIDS. WAKE UP!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »