On 2003-09-26 14:33:00, Anonymous wrote:
"the video was not released by the owner. it was released by a self serving person that thought they had rights. take a break scary, it was better here without you. atleast it was productive. i hope the owner has some recourse."
Anon, you seem to know who released the video to Inside Edition. If it wasn't the "owner" but some self-serving individual, how did they get a copy of the video to give to Inside Edition?
Anon, how did they get a copy, since you seem to know so much?
Again, your statement about " the video was not released by the owner. it was released by a self serving person that thought they had rights," tell me who in this world has "rights" to a video that shows children being abused? What rights does anyone have to a video that shows children being abused.
Anon, how do you see releasing that video by the indvidual who released it to be "self-serving?" That person let the world know by releasing that video that there are evil people out there who will take children in for money and abuse them in an attempt to "straighten" them out. Information like that is not to be kept hidden. It should be given to all of the media. It should be broadcast over and over again.