Carey what are you doing to help kids in WWASP besides post

[Anonymous]

?

[Anonymous]

Why the silence Carey?

[Carey]

I have shared the experience that my family has had with "programs" and "consultants".  Am I not measuring up to your expectations, Anon?  

I have learned that people who oppose WWASP attack everyone that does not jump up and down and say "RIGHT ON" to everything they beleive.  I have also leanned that these same people accuse everyone of "child abuse" who do not, nod their head yes to all they share.

I have a lot of doubts about a lot people and a lot of things that are going on.

[Anonymous]

Carey are you not accusing those of "child abuse" who use qualified escorts to take their children to credible facilities?

it's seems you've just described how you are critizing others? it seems you are critical of anyone that doesn't jump up and down and say right on Carey?

you seem to make judgements rather quickly. We've all heard your story and appreciate your anguish to rescue your sons but now you seem to want to "debate" to be right rather than use your experience to create political/social changes?

I too have alot of doubts about what is going on that's why I'm working for real changes.

Is it okay for someone to not agree with you?

[Carey]

Carey are you not accusing those of "child abuse" who use qualified escorts to take their children to credible facilities?

First, can you show me where I said that?

Second, what is your definition of a qualified escort?  What makes them qualified?  I would think the qualified escort would be the parents.

[Anonymous]

wouldn't take the time to go there ...you've been bashing PURE for months for using escorts and for using programs at all.

qualified escorts could be parents..I kinda like what CA did and required that ANY escort must register with the police prior to the removal.

[Carey]

Narvin Litchfield is a parent...would that make him a qualified escort?  

Ken Kay is a parent...would that make him a qualified escort?

By the way I am sure you have been looking very hard to try and prove your false statment about me bashing PURE for using escorts.  But so you will know I do think PURE is second in line to Dundee for eploiting families and their children.  I do not need to use the escort services issue to bash PURE.

[Anonymous]

carey's a parent who shipped her son's off to live with their dad.........does that qualify her to be an escort?

or maybe someone who doesn't want the responsibiliies of raising children of her own?

[Antigen]

Having spent more time than usual reading this forum today, I can tell you who the biggest PURE bashers are; PURE supporters.

It's not so much the content of your claims on victimhood as the way you go about it. I feel like I'm back in group, for Christ's sake! If you're trying to make the point that you're completely different from WWAS, nothing a'tall like `em, uh, uh, nosiree Bobbo, you are failing miserably.  ::noway::

If the personal freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution inhibit the
government's ability to govern the people, we should look to limit those guarantees.

--President Bill Clinton

[Anonymous]

On 2003-10-12 16:12:00, Antigen wrote:

"Having spent more time than usual reading this forum today, I can tell you who the biggest PURE bashers are; PURE supporters.



It's not so much the content of your claims on victimhood as the way you go about it. I feel like I'm back in group, for Christ's sake! If you're trying to make the point that you're completely different from WWAS, nothing a'tall like `em, uh, uh, nosiree Bobbo, you are failing miserably.  ::noway::

If the personal freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution inhibit the
government's ability to govern the people, we should look to limit those guarantees.

--President Bill Clinton

"

Of late, I am of the same opinion and have concluded these ex-wwaspers could use some time-off from their crusade to facilitate some (no pun intended) emotional, if not intellectual,growth.  I mean, this relentless bashing of anybody and everybody whose opinions do not mirror their own (or heaven forbid, are off topic, as in non-wwasps related) is the height of hypocrisy. Group thinking may be the lynch pin that holds this "group" of ex-wwaspers and their fragile agenda together, but for the rest of us, it smacks of THOUGHT CONTROL and is therefore, extremely repugnant.

[Anonymous]

Excuse me, I should have said "for me" it is extremely repugnant not the "rest of us" which is a presumptive conclusion.