« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: To Melissa R  (Read 6411 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2003, 09:57:00 AM »
Jeff, you are mistaken.  Melissa and I are not one in the same.

It does not surprise me that you accuse me of posting under two different names.  You make all kinds of accusations based on what you "think" to be the case.

It must be really uncomfortable for you to have to be so paranoid.

[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2003-09-16 06:59 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2003, 10:18:00 AM »
Anon,

Jeff's request to Melissa to keep her sniping to herself, sounds like just that . A REQUEST.

No need to create a argument over requests.

There are bigger problems in our world.

Get a grip and strive toward working together .

Melissa, If you are who you say you are hook up with the law firm to REALLY make a difference.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2003, 11:08:00 AM »
Quote
Melissa, If you are who you say you are hook up with the law firm to REALLY make a difference.


Some of us can't or won't hook up with the law firm because of Sue's affiliation with them. If one is going to stand up for the rights of children, then they should do it across the board.  They should not substitute one bad for another.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #18 on: September 16, 2003, 11:10:00 AM »
Carey,  


That is an ignorant commnet,misconception.

You snooze you looze.....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #19 on: September 16, 2003, 11:20:00 AM »
Naming calling in itself is ignorant, it ususally means you can't argue your case.

By the way, learn how to spell if you are going to call someone ignorant.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #20 on: September 16, 2003, 11:46:00 AM »
Carey,  

I did'nt call YOU ignorant .I stated your comment was ignorant. As in lack of knowledge.
Uninformed,unaware.Not having all of the facts.

You are incorrect in assuming Sue is Huron.

Huron is handling this case with confidence.

They will achieve what they have set out to accomplish.

Sue is not the issue.Holding wwasp accountable is.

Get over the Sue thing. Move forward.

What is a better way to hold the perpetrators of abuse,inhumane treatment of kids accountable than to support each other?

How are YOU making a difference in this quest?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #21 on: September 16, 2003, 11:57:00 AM »
Quote
You are incorrect in assuming Sue is Huron.


You seem to be the one doing the assuming.

Where did I say Sue is Huron?  I did not say that.  Sue is very involved, as are her attorneys with Huron.  I choose not to be a part of that. I will not fight one bad apple with another bad apple.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #22 on: September 16, 2003, 11:58:00 AM »
That was me.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #23 on: September 16, 2003, 12:47:00 PM »
Carey,

Again.What are you choosing to do to help the children still incarcerated in the Program?


I see lots of comments ,very little positive action.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #24 on: September 16, 2003, 03:25:00 PM »
Some one writes:
Some of us can't or won't hook up with the law firm because of Sue's affiliation with them. If one is going to stand up for the rights of children, then they should do it across the board. They should not substitute one bad for another.

 For anyone considering the class action; who feels they disapprove of Sue and/or her business; Rest assured, you needn?t have anything to do with one, to take part in the other.
They are not affiliated or connected.

It really has nothing to do with her.
Its intierly possible to call and request information, and give information, and never hear or speak her name.
No one with the law firm would care what you think about her; or if you know her - its a complete non factor.
Also, like any client, you would have attorney/client privilege - no one would be gossiping about who you are, or that you called or what you said - Just not gonna happen.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #25 on: September 16, 2003, 03:56:00 PM »
Quote
They are not affiliated or connected.

 
Are you saying that Sue is not involved in the class action law suit that is being filed? Are you saying that her attorneys have not provided the Huron Law group with information?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #26 on: September 16, 2003, 04:24:00 PM »
I can't remember WHERE I read it, so I can't PROVE it, but it was stated as fact when I saw it - Jeffery Berryman,(maybe?) wrote it somewhere.

It had to do with the class action being filed in direct relation to the wwasp vs pure court hearing.  Kind of a retaliation, of sorts.  

Wish I could be more definite and specific.  Sorry, if this is not the case.

Maybe it doesn't matter....but I am not going to get sucked into this web of deceit.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
To Melissa R
« Reply #27 on: September 16, 2003, 05:34:00 PM »
There are folks with whom I would not want to be too closely affiliated and who I'm pretty sure would jump right onto a class action against Straight, DFAF or whoever we could manage to drop a class action on. Doesn't matter who I'm talking about so please don't anyone make a mountain out of that mole hill. I'm sure there are folks who feel just the same about me.

That, however, would not stop me from joining in the action. Ya'll only need to look at the cause of action and decide whether or not it's apropriate and worthwhile for you to join. It doesn't matter what else is going on in the frey.

The WWASPies seem to be operating under the delusion that all this criticizm springs from Sue and PURE, even though it dates back to long before Sue ever put her daughter in a WWASP facility. This, of course, is a bizarre thing to believe. But don't let their monkey wrenching keep you from doing what your concience and intilect tell you you ought to.
 

"Narcotics have been systematically scapegoated and demonized. The idea that anyone can use drugs and escape a horrible fate is an anathema to these idiots. I predict that in the near future right-wingers will use drug hysteria as a pretext to set up an international police apparatus."

--William S. Burroughs

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #28 on: September 16, 2003, 05:53:00 PM »
I have been talking directly with Huron law firm for many months now.  Sue and PURE have nothing to do with this class action suit.  Huron has  been in contact with Sue and her lawyers to get background information, and that is all.  Sue has her own law suit going on.  Huron does not represent her.  

This is a suit to hold WWASP accountable for things they have done to many of us and our children.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
To Melissa R
« Reply #29 on: September 16, 2003, 05:56:00 PM »
Quote
Are you saying that Sue is not involved in the class action law suit that is being filed? Are you saying that her attorneys have not provided the Huron Law group with information?



I would still like the questions answered.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »