Author Topic: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies  (Read 885587 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mark babitz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 808
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies
« Reply #1770 on: September 30, 2010, 08:01:05 PM »
Michael Skakel Speaks from Prison Cell
By Stephen M. Silverman
Thursday May 01, 2003 03:02 PM EDT

FacebookTwitterE-mailMichael Skakel's brother Stephen and sister Julie make the journey every week to the MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution in Suffield, Conn, PEOPLE exclusively reports in its latest issue.

But the person who the Kennedy cousin -- now serving 20 years to life for the bludgeoning death of his onetime neighbor, 15-year-old Martha Moxley, in her family's Greenwich yard on Oct. 30, 1975 -- says he would like to see most, his 4-year-old son George (with ex-wife Margot Sheridan), hasn't come to visit.

The family believes it would be too upsetting for the youngster. And that is the punishment Skakel, 42, says he finds hardest to bear.

In a series of written answers to questions posed by PEOPLE (his first lengthy communication since his conviction last June), Skakel, who maintains his innocence, says that from his first day behind bars he wept to God for mercy for himself and his son. "I did that every day," he said. "I do that still."

From his prison cell, Skakel paints a family portrait of people who were as dysfunctional as they were wealthy. He says that when his mother, Anne, became ill with brain cancer in 1968, when he was 8, he was told instead that she had eaten some "bad shellfish."

Later, he says, he was staggered when he saw she had lost her hair and gained a great deal of weight from the medical treatments. "I asked someone, 'What happened to her hair?' I was told it was 'bad' shampoo," he writes. "I stopped using shampoo (because) I did not want to look like my mom."

When his mother finally succumbed to the cancer in 1973, the news came as a complete shock. Skakel says his father, Rushton Sr., an aloof and imperious man, simply announced to the seven kids one day, "Well, you know what happened, she's dead!"

Recalls Michael: "I was so stunned I could not get out of my seat. When everybody left, I screamed
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mark babitz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 808
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mark babitz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 808
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DannyB II

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3273
  • Karma: +5/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies
« Reply #1773 on: September 30, 2010, 09:27:30 PM »
Quote from: "mark babitz"
Michael Skakel Speaks from Prison Cell
By Stephen M. Silverman
Thursday May 01, 2003 03:02 PM EDT

FacebookTwitterE-mailMichael Skakel's brother Stephen and sister Julie make the journey every week to the MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution in Suffield, Conn, PEOPLE exclusively reports in its latest issue.

But the person who the Kennedy cousin -- now serving 20 years to life for the bludgeoning death of his onetime neighbor, 15-year-old Martha Moxley, in her family's Greenwich yard on Oct. 30, 1975 -- says he would like to see most, his 4-year-old son George (with ex-wife Margot Sheridan), hasn't come to visit.

The family believes it would be too upsetting for the youngster. And that is the punishment Skakel, 42, says he finds hardest to bear.

In a series of written answers to questions posed by PEOPLE (his first lengthy communication since his conviction last June), Skakel, who maintains his innocence, says that from his first day behind bars he wept to God for mercy for himself and his son. "I did that every day," he said. "I do that still."

From his prison cell, Skakel paints a family portrait of people who were as dysfunctional as they were wealthy. He says that when his mother, Anne, became ill with brain cancer in 1968, when he was 8, he was told instead that she had eaten some "bad shellfish."

Later, he says, he was staggered when he saw she had lost her hair and gained a great deal of weight from the medical treatments. "I asked someone, 'What happened to her hair?' I was told it was 'bad' shampoo," he writes. "I stopped using shampoo (because) I did not want to look like my mom."

When his mother finally succumbed to the cancer in 1973, the news came as a complete shock. Skakel says his father, Rushton Sr., an aloof and imperious man, simply announced to the seven kids one day, "Well, you know what happened, she's dead!"

Recalls Michael: "I was so stunned I could not get out of my seat. When everybody left, I screamed


Mike, I believe was the youngest. Where were all his sibling, "WHERE", no where. They all stayed away from this, they did not even show up at the trial. Some said because of media attention, bullshit, that is not why.
Do I know without a shadow of a doubt that Mike did it, NO. I just have a strong gut feeling it comes down to Mike and Tom, they know exactly what happened.
Thanks for all the posts of info, Mark. It is always appreciated.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Stand and fight, till there is no more.

Offline liarsexposed

  • Posts: 784
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies
« Reply #1774 on: September 30, 2010, 10:34:45 PM »
I am sorry to inform you Art, John Higgins never actually got any money. His conscious got the best of him and he refused to accept any money.  
Why are you sorry...
geez Danny
You can go on.......
consequences of your stupid actions.. Interesting phrase.
I am not going to debate the merits of being harrassed vs. being the harrasser. I think you have probably lost track of the back and forth nonesense.. as have I. I simply havent much to say to you. I'd like to like ya,and I have tried. But you are not worthy of any more of my attention (or anyone else').
With respect to Michael. I think you oughta STFU.. but because I printed that.. You will do the opposite for days.
Mr Higgins lives out here too Danny. I believe he is one of Mark's neighbors
Your quote above lacks integrity about John. I dont believe it. But then (lol) "we been there before"
Were you gonna show Mark where I said fornits would be closed down.. Cuz Im dying to see that quote too
Didnt think so
Like I said before. You have over 200 threads of space to feel free, and able, to be whomever you want to be. After all,this IS the internet. You are becoming famous for this.
But dont bother me with your games

ps sorry I was late getting back to you. Was with my friends !
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DannyB II

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3273
  • Karma: +5/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies
« Reply #1775 on: September 30, 2010, 11:16:47 PM »
Quote from: "liarsexposed"
I am sorry to inform you Art, John Higgins never actually got any money. His conscious got the best of him and he refused to accept any money.  
Why are you sorry...
geez Danny
You can go on.......
consequences of your stupid actions.. Interesting phrase.
I am not going to debate the merits of being harrassed vs. being the harrasser. I think you have probably lost track of the back and forth nonesense.. as have I. I simply havent much to say to you. I'd like to like ya,and I have tried. But you are not worthy of any more of my attention (or anyone else').
With respect to Michael. I think you oughta STFU.. but because I printed that.. You will do the opposite for days.
Mr Higgins lives out here too Danny. I believe he is one of Mark's neighbors
Your quote above lacks integrity about John. I dont believe it. But then (lol) "we been there before"
Were you gonna show Mark where I said fornits would be closed down.. Cuz Im dying to see that quote too
Didnt think so
Like I said before. You have over 200 threads of space to feel free, and able, to be whomever you want to be. After all,this IS the internet. You are becoming famous for this.
But dont bother me with your games

ps sorry I was late getting back to you. Was with my friends !


Ok, all done with you. I thought we could all have a conversation about something interesting for a change but no, Art does not want participate. Well fine, then sit on the sidelines and watch Mark and myself talk.

Oh, BTW I know exactly where John Higgins lives, like Harry Krannick he is a good friend of mine. Or should we call Harry and ask him Art. Go ahead call Harry, ask him about John.

Art, your the only one that is lacking in information about this subject and the people involved. Yes we all know you were at Elan the same time Mike was there, which would also put you there when I was there. Albeit a short period of time, I left shortly after you got there.
Art, be a good man and be nice to yourself and others.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Stand and fight, till there is no more.

Offline SharonMcCarthy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 460
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies
« Reply #1776 on: September 30, 2010, 11:58:23 PM »
What I find absolutely amazing is Art brings me up when I am obviously too busy to be here. Well, just popping in to tell you all a few things. I am home for a bit, but shall be back on my way again soon. As for Fornits...bahahahahaha I completely think this place is a fucken complete joke. If Art shuts it down...it will not bother me one fucking bit....go for it Pathetic Fruitcake...maybe then the truth will set you free....bahahahahahahah way funny..."They are liars I tell you, all liars" Art you are fucking crazy...get it crazy....do you hear voices too...I would not doubt it.

Danny wipe the shit smear off your nose, your to far up PSY ass lately.


Mark missed you buddy call me in the morning and let's touch base. Did you get the pictures I emailed from last week in the city?? It was a blast we shall have to do it again real soon. Mason was so thrilled to see you too.


ARTY guess what I got four bands scheduled.... :seg:



I think Dale should show up as well. Mark see what you can arrange..it is bound to be a great time.  :nods:


Well goodnight looney land time for me to get some much deserved rest....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"A little knowledge that acts is worth infinitely more than much knowledge that is idle."
Kahlil Gibran

Offline mark babitz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 808
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies
« Reply #1777 on: October 01, 2010, 07:04:48 AM »
Quote from: "SharonMcCarthy"
What I find absolutely amazing is Art brings me up when I am obviously too busy to be here. Well, just popping in to tell you all a few things. I am home for a bit, but shall be back on my way again soon. As for Fornits...bahahahahaha I completely think this place is a fucken complete joke. If Art shuts it down...it will not bother me one fucking bit....go for it Pathetic Fruitcake...maybe then the truth will set you free....bahahahahahahah way funny..."They are liars I tell you, all liars" Art you are fucking crazy...get it crazy....do you hear voices too...I would not doubt it.

Danny wipe the shit smear off your nose, your to far up PSY ass lately.


Mark missed you buddy call me in the morning and let's touch base. Did you get the pictures I emailed from last week in the city?? It was a blast we shall have to do it again real soon. Mason was so thrilled to see you too.


ARTY guess what I got four bands scheduled.... :seg:



I think Dale should show up as well. Mark see what you can arrange..it is bound to be a great time.  :nods:


Well goodnight looney land time for me to get some much deserved rest....



I got them Sharon and they turned out great.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline liarsexposed

  • Posts: 784
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies
« Reply #1778 on: October 01, 2010, 07:15:49 AM »
Sharon
I hope the event turns out great, and raises tons of cash for you and your family. I also hope Mason recovers quickly and you can put this whole thing behind you.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mark babitz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 808
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies
« Reply #1779 on: October 01, 2010, 07:33:07 AM »
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=w ... -xFhcjPsxg




Why can't Martha's real killer be brought to justice? BECAUSE CONNECTICUT'S COURTS ARE A RUBBER STAMP.

"I had a club. I picked one up and swung it." - Tony Bryant

In 2002, Michael Skakel was wrongfully convicted of killing Martha Moxley, 26 years in the past with a golf club. The State of Connecticut RAILROADED him in a desparate reaction to the public uproar over the book, "Murder In Greenwich", in which the author (convicted purjuror Mark Fuhrman) named Kennedy Cousin Michael Skakel as the killer. Hundreds of thousands of people read the book and became enraged at Michael Skakel, the Greenwich Police, and the Kennedies.

What Mark Fuhrman refused to emphasize was that A NEGROID HAIR was found on the sheet used to wrap Martha's body, but it obviously does not match Michael Skakel's DNA. Michael Skakel is not African American, but new suspects Gitano "Tony" Bryant and Adolph Hasbrouck ARE.  In 2003, in a videotaped interview with an investigator, TONY BRYANT ADMITTED TO PICKING UP AND SWINGING A GOLF CLUB NEAR THE CRIME SCENE ON THE NIGHT OF THE MURDER. Tragically, SUSAN GILL, a major State's Attorney on the case, does not seem to think there is any reason to test the evidence to see if it matches Tony Bryant or Adolph Hasbrouck (the man Tony implicates). There is absolutely no physical evidence tying Michael Skakel to the murder. The prosecution ran a DNA analysis AT THE TIME OF THE TRIAL, and never once found any of Michael Skakel's DNA.  An FBI analysis showed that the African American hair did NOT come from the black police officer, nor did it come from any other known African Americans. Therefore, it must have come from Tony Bryant or Adolph Hasbrouck, whom the police did not know about until AFTER Michael Skakel's conviction.

Looks like some money and motivation was involved

Michael Skakel's wrongful conviction was a result of Mark Fuhrman's book, "Murder in Greenwich", and PAID WITNESSES*, some of whom had read the book. Most of the key witnesses had come forward in response to a reward, or to pressure from lead investigator Frank Garr who "cajoled, harrassed, or threatened" witneses (as stated by his close friend Len Levitt). At one point the reward was announced on Television, and it was increased to $100,000. The state's star witness was:


Gregory Coleman: Gregory Coleman was a hard core heroin addict who had a $50,000 tax lien on his house in New York State. When he saw the reward on television, he decided to call the telephone number that flashed on his TV screen. He had gone to the Elan School with Michael Skakel. He knew that Michael Skakel was interrogated about the murder while at the school. He called the number, and gave some information to the television station, hoping to get the reward. Shortly thereafter, Frank Garr (Connecticut Investigator) tracked Coleman down and a deal was worked out for Gregory Coleman to testify. Gregory Coleman, in addition to qualifying for the reward money, was given A NARCOTIC DRUG WITH THE HELP ON THE GREENWICH POLICE the night before he testified in the Grand Jury hearing (he was going through Heroin withdrawal, having recently been released from a New York State prison, and threatened to go home if he did not get a fix). The morning after in court, Gregory Coleman testified that he had heard Michael Skakel confess to the murder, a statement that is likely to be completely false.

The state called many other witnesses, but none claimed an outright confession quite like Gregory Coleman had claimed. John Higgins, who also testified for reward money, claimed that Michael Skakel made incriminating statements. His testimony, however, contains lies as described in Robert Kennedy's article, "A Miscarriage Of Justice". Reward money was likely John Higgin's motivation as well.

In addition, many of the other witnesses aggressively assembled by the State had read Mark Fuhrman's compelling book, had been influenced by the media sensationalism surrounding the case, or had been "cajoled, harrassed, or threatened" by Frank Garr (see "Conviction").

Mark Fuhrman's book was compelling because it focused on an artificial but sensational "Kennedy/Wealth Theme", and it also was based heavily on the "Sutton Reports". The Sutton Reports are a damn convincing work of fiction created by Sutton Associates, an investigative firm. What most people don't understand is that THE SUTTON REPORTS WERE INTENTIONALLY PREJUDICED AGAINST MICHAEL AND TOM SKAKEL. Under intense pressure from others, Rushton Skakel Sr (Michael's father). paid a large sum of money to Sutton Associates to get prejudicial reports on his children in case they were involved in the murder. Sutton Associates did NOT write a PREJUDICIAL report against Ken Littleton, however. A look at the actual police files would show Ken Littleton to be a much stronger suspect than the Skakels, but Sutton Associates wrote a pathetic report on Ken. It was especially pathetic given the evidence Former State Inspector Jack Solomon had against Ken. For example, WITHIN NINE MONTHS OF THE MURDER:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DannyB II

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3273
  • Karma: +5/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies
« Reply #1780 on: October 01, 2010, 02:55:54 PM »
Quote from: "mark babitz"
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=5&sqi=2&ved=0CCIQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fscribblguy.50megs.com%2Fskakel.htm&ei=vMWlTJWCCoKcnwfX7p2RAQ&usg=AFQjCNE-0V2uWy7BiO6YzDfT-xFhcjPsxg




Why can't Martha's real killer be brought to justice? BECAUSE CONNECTICUT'S COURTS ARE A RUBBER STAMP.

"I had a club. I picked one up and swung it." - Tony Bryant

In 2002, Michael Skakel was wrongfully convicted of killing Martha Moxley, 26 years in the past with a golf club. The State of Connecticut RAILROADED him in a desparate reaction to the public uproar over the book, "Murder In Greenwich", in which the author (convicted purjuror Mark Fuhrman) named Kennedy Cousin Michael Skakel as the killer. Hundreds of thousands of people read the book and became enraged at Michael Skakel, the Greenwich Police, and the Kennedies.

What Mark Fuhrman refused to emphasize was that A NEGROID HAIR was found on the sheet used to wrap Martha's body, but it obviously does not match Michael Skakel's DNA. Michael Skakel is not African American, but new suspects Gitano "Tony" Bryant and Adolph Hasbrouck ARE.  In 2003, in a videotaped interview with an investigator, TONY BRYANT ADMITTED TO PICKING UP AND SWINGING A GOLF CLUB NEAR THE CRIME SCENE ON THE NIGHT OF THE MURDER. Tragically, SUSAN GILL, a major State's Attorney on the case, does not seem to think there is any reason to test the evidence to see if it matches Tony Bryant or Adolph Hasbrouck (the man Tony implicates). There is absolutely no physical evidence tying Michael Skakel to the murder. The prosecution ran a DNA analysis AT THE TIME OF THE TRIAL, and never once found any of Michael Skakel's DNA.  An FBI analysis showed that the African American hair did NOT come from the black police officer, nor did it come from any other known African Americans. Therefore, it must have come from Tony Bryant or Adolph Hasbrouck, whom the police did not know about until AFTER Michael Skakel's conviction.

Looks like some money and motivation was involved

Michael Skakel's wrongful conviction was a result of Mark Fuhrman's book, "Murder in Greenwich", and PAID WITNESSES*, some of whom had read the book. Most of the key witnesses had come forward in response to a reward, or to pressure from lead investigator Frank Garr who "cajoled, harrassed, or threatened" witneses (as stated by his close friend Len Levitt). At one point the reward was announced on Television, and it was increased to $100,000. The state's star witness was:


Gregory Coleman: Gregory Coleman was a hard core heroin addict who had a $50,000 tax lien on his house in New York State. When he saw the reward on television, he decided to call the telephone number that flashed on his TV screen. He had gone to the Elan School with Michael Skakel. He knew that Michael Skakel was interrogated about the murder while at the school. He called the number, and gave some information to the television station, hoping to get the reward. Shortly thereafter, Frank Garr (Connecticut Investigator) tracked Coleman down and a deal was worked out for Gregory Coleman to testify. Gregory Coleman, in addition to qualifying for the reward money, was given A NARCOTIC DRUG WITH THE HELP ON THE GREENWICH POLICE the night before he testified in the Grand Jury hearing (he was going through Heroin withdrawal, having recently been released from a New York State prison, and threatened to go home if he did not get a fix). The morning after in court, Gregory Coleman testified that he had heard Michael Skakel confess to the murder, a statement that is likely to be completely false.

The state called many other witnesses, but none claimed an outright confession quite like Gregory Coleman had claimed. John Higgins, who also testified for reward money, claimed that Michael Skakel made incriminating statements. His testimony, however, contains lies as described in Robert Kennedy's article, "A Miscarriage Of Justice". Reward money was likely John Higgin's motivation as well.

In addition, many of the other witnesses aggressively assembled by the State had read Mark Fuhrman's compelling book, had been influenced by the media sensationalism surrounding the case, or had been "cajoled, harrassed, or threatened" by Frank Garr (see "Conviction").

Mark Fuhrman's book was compelling because it focused on an artificial but sensational "Kennedy/Wealth Theme", and it also was based heavily on the "Sutton Reports". The Sutton Reports are a damn convincing work of fiction created by Sutton Associates, an investigative firm. What most people don't understand is that THE SUTTON REPORTS WERE INTENTIONALLY PREJUDICED AGAINST MICHAEL AND TOM SKAKEL. Under intense pressure from others, Rushton Skakel Sr (Michael's father). paid a large sum of money to Sutton Associates to get prejudicial reports on his children in case they were involved in the murder. Sutton Associates did NOT write a PREJUDICIAL report against Ken Littleton, however. A look at the actual police files would show Ken Littleton to be a much stronger suspect than the Skakels, but Sutton Associates wrote a pathetic report on Ken. It was especially pathetic given the evidence Former State Inspector Jack Solomon had against Ken. For example, WITHIN NINE MONTHS OF THE MURDER:

Don't know who is exactly behind this article you posted here Mark but the Sutton Report is and was authentic and it crippled Mike's chances of not being convicted. That report was not fabricated in the way this person said it was, his father Rushton allowed the investigators to look into this murder with no restraints. The report is what they found. One of the investigators was a close friend of Dominick Dunne (Vanity Fair Mag.), it was Dunne who contacted Furman to look into this murder. This murder was stalled, a cold case, Furman believe it or not brought credibility, which infused energy into the investigation again. Frank Garr the Detective on the case since the murder was overjoyed, he knew their were genuine clues inside the Skakle family but did not have the backing of the Greenwich politicians to pursue the leads, (Rushton was able to squash many leads).
The Sutton Report, was I believe the Kennedy's hierarchy involvement, they wanted to know the truth. Well they got it, the whole Skakel and Kennedy family got the truth whether they wanted it or not.
They can minimize that report all they want but it was this report that put Mike in prison.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Stand and fight, till there is no more.

Offline liarsexposed

  • Posts: 784
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies
« Reply #1781 on: October 01, 2010, 04:13:06 PM »
Furman believe it or not brought credibility,
 
Convicted of purgury and a known racist. Wonder what he got away with and was never convicted of or caught for

One word Danny
YAWWWWWWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DannyB II

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3273
  • Karma: +5/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies
« Reply #1782 on: October 01, 2010, 05:50:19 PM »
Quote from: "liarsexposed"
Furman believe it or not brought credibility,
 
Convicted of purgury and a known racist. Wonder what he got away with and was never convicted of or caught for

One word Danny
YAWWWWWWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

I don't disagree with your judgment but look at his book sales and their still selling. Dominick Dunne's backing did not hurt either, he was very familiar with the "social set" of Greenwich, CT. He sort of greased the skids for Mark.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Stand and fight, till there is no more.

Offline mark babitz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 808
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies
« Reply #1783 on: October 01, 2010, 06:17:52 PM »
http://lifeloom.com/II2Mroch.htm

A member of Mystery Writers of America and the Short Mystery Fiction Society, Courtney Mroch’s award-winning short stories have appeared in numerous zines. Her short story “Skin Ish Ca” (published by Orchard Press Mysteries in 2003) ranked #2 in the 2003 Preditors & Editors Reader Poll. Her e-book, Cellfish Ways, published by Echelon Press, is the publisher’s year-to-date #2 best-selling dollar download. Her first novel, Beneath the Morvan Moon, a romantic suspense with paranormal overtones, was recently released in trade paperback by PublishAmerica and as an ebook from Writers Exchange Electronic Publishing.


Ms. Mroch lives in Jacksonville, Florida with her husband, Wayne Pryor, their cat, Mr. Meow, and dog, Murphy. To learn more, visit her website: courtneymroch.com. Direct correspondence to Courtney Mroch or to editor@lifeloom.com

Defrosting a Cold Case:
How Author Dominick Dunne Helped Catch a Killer
            Sometimes murders go unsolved. Sometimes there are no suspects. Sometimes there is a suspect, but not enough evidence to pin a charge on him or her. Sometimes loved ones never get answers, comfort, or see justice delivered to the killers who robbed them of their husbands, wives, sons, or daughters.

            In Greenwich, Connecticut, on October 30, 1975, Dorothy and David Moxley lost their daughter, Martha, when she was brutally beaten to death with a golf club. The murder weapon came from a set of clubs belonging to the Moxley's neighbors, the Skakels. One of the Skakel boys, Tommy, was the last person seen with Martha the night she died. He became a prime suspect, but no charges were ever filed against him. No charges were ever filed against anyone. It seemed the Moxleys would be damned to the horrible fate of never seeing their daughter's killer brought to justice.

            On the night of October 30, 1975, known as Mischief Night in Martha's Greenwich neighborhood of Belle Haven, Martha's mom became suspicious when her daughter failed to come in at a decent time. It was a Thursday night, there was no school the next day, a perfect evening for kids to cut loose on the first night of a three-day weekend. Though Martha didn't have a specific curfew, she rarely abused the privilege by staying out until all hours. It wasn't until Martha's mom had exhausted all the neighbors' houses that she called police to report Martha missing at around 3:30 a.m.

            What could be worse for parents than not knowing where their child is? The anxiety, the worry, the anger. Martha's mother quickly found out there were many things worse than not knowing where her child was. Shortly after noon on October 31, 1975, one of Martha's friends was cutting through Martha's backyard to check to see if there was any word yet. That's when she saw Martha's body under a tree, her jeans pulled down, a piece of the golf club used to kill her sticking out of her neck. (The attack had been so vicious the golf club had broken into four pieces, the handle of which was never found.)

            Upon finding her daughter's body, Dorothy Moxley's nightmare escalated into something even worse – a living hell. Who would kill Martha? Why?

            As in all homicide cases, an investigation was immediately underway. But this was more than a homicide case. This was a case of murder in a place where the wealthiest lived, a place where evil deeds like murder were not supposed to happen. Especially not to fifteen-year-old girls. Belle Haven was an exclusive, gated community, where people belonged to country clubs and yacht clubs. In murder mystery books it might make an intriguing setting for a murder, but in real life murder just was not supposed to happen here. And when it did, it went unsolved for nearly twenty-five years.

            This horror trumps all others Dorothy Moxley felt – knowing her child had been slain, suspecting that either someone in her neighbor's house was the culprit or knew who was, and not having any way to prove it. Not being able to see justice done was hell on earth. .

            Why couldn't police solve the case? They were more than capable of doing it, but did privilege, power, and money have a hand in it? Tommy Skakel, the prime suspect, was the son of Rushton Skakel, a Kennedy relative. Rushton, a widower whose wife had died in 1972, lived with his children, five boys and a daughter, across from the Moxleys. The Skakels were third generation Belle Haven residents. Old money. Staying power. The Moxleys had moved to Belle Haven only a year before, from California. It shouldn't have mattered who lived there longer, who was related to who, who had more money. Yet, somehow it did. (Even though to this day Greenwich police would deny otherwise.)

            Having to look at the house where her daughter's killer might be living freely finally caused the Moxleys to relocate to New York. When her husband died, Dorothy Moxley moved to Annapolis, Maryland. It was there, in 1991, after sixteen years of learning to cope with the reality that finding Martha's killer was not meant to be, that she received a call from a man who had also had a daughter murdered. Though his case was no connection to hers, he felt he could help her. His name was Dominick Dunne, a writer who, at that time, had just had three best-selling novels made into successful television miniseries. After talking with Mrs. Moxley, he felt he could renew interest in her case by writing a book about it. Perhaps they could see justice done after all.

            It was that chance meeting, Mr. Dunne taking the initiative to contact Mrs. Moxley, and her finally agreeing to meet with him, that set the ball in motion for a series of events that finally brought answers, a conviction, and justice.

            Dominick Dunne's A Season of Purgatory was released in 1993. It was a work of fiction, but it was based on the events that happened in Greenwich, Connecticut on October 30, 1975. He changed the names, the characteristics of the Skakel family, and used a different murder weapon so as to avoid a lawsuit, but it was the Moxley murder. The CBS Evening News gave it a lot of exposure. Interest in the Martha Moxley cold case was rekindled.

            During a book tour, Mr. Dunne was approached by an African American woman in the Tattered Cover bookstore in Denver, Colorado. She had crime scene photos of Martha's body, as she had once worked on the Greenwich Police force. She didn't want Dunne to use her name, so in his book, Justice: Crimes, Trials, and Punishments, he doesn't. However, she did assert upon the conclusion of their meeting that Tommy Skakel, the prime suspect, didn't do it. This stunned Dunne, because he was positive, based on the facts he knew then, that Tommy must have done it. .

            In 1996, A Season of Purgatory, the television miniseries, aired. Seven months later, Dominick Dunne received crucial information from another informant, who also asked to remain anonymous. This information has since become known as the Sutton Report, a report compiled by a private detective Rushton Skakel hired to look into Martha Moxley's murder and his son's possible involvement. The report agreed with what the African American woman had told Dunne: Tommy Skakel most likely had not killed Martha Moxley. In all probability, his younger brother, Michael, age fifteen at the time of the murder, had.

            Frank Garr, a Greenwich detective who had worked on the case since the beginning, attained a copy of the report, but nothing came of it. No charges were filed against Michael. The matter might have stayed closed if not for one more chance encounter.

            Lucianne Goldberg, the literary agent for Mark Fuhrman (yes, from the infamous O.J. Simpson trial), called Dunne to ask if he had any leads on anything where Fuhrman could turn his detective skills. Fuhrman's first book, Murder in Brentwood, had turned out to be a success. Dunne knew just the topic and case for Fuhrman – the Moxley cold case.

            Released in 1999, Fuhrman's Murder in Greenwich cast even more exposure on the case. Dunne asserts that it was Fuhrman's book that led to the grand jury indictment of Michael Skakel twenty-five years after Martha's murder. (And ultimately to Michael's conviction twenty-seven years later, on June 7, 2002, when he was sentenced to twenty years behind bars.) But would Fuhrman still have ended up being guided to the case if Dunne hadn't directed him there? It was Dunne's interest, after all, that had truly taken the Moxley cold case out of the freezer and laid it on the counter to thaw.

            Dorothy Moxley's husband hadn't lived to see the day his daughter's killer was tried and convicted, but she had. There's no telling if her heart found peace afterwards or not, but at least the wondering was over. She hadn't been powerful enough on her own to bring Martha's killer to justice, but she certainly ended up having a lot of help. Starting with Dominick Dunne. Thanks to him, brave people, who were also variously connected to the case and wanted to see justice done, took the initiative to step forward with information they had. The combined effects caught a killer, and provided some measure of comfort to Martha's mother.

Copyright 2004 by Courtney Mr
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DannyB II

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3273
  • Karma: +5/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Elan discussion from New Forum Policies
« Reply #1784 on: October 01, 2010, 06:27:32 PM »
Quote from: "mark babitz"
http://lifeloom.com/II2Mroch.htm

A member of Mystery Writers of America and the Short Mystery Fiction Society, Courtney Mroch’s award-winning short stories have appeared in numerous zines. Her short story “Skin Ish Ca” (published by Orchard Press Mysteries in 2003) ranked #2 in the 2003 Preditors & Editors Reader Poll. Her e-book, Cellfish Ways, published by Echelon Press, is the publisher’s year-to-date #2 best-selling dollar download. Her first novel, Beneath the Morvan Moon, a romantic suspense with paranormal overtones, was recently released in trade paperback by PublishAmerica and as an ebook from Writers Exchange Electronic Publishing.


Ms. Mroch lives in Jacksonville, Florida with her husband, Wayne Pryor, their cat, Mr. Meow, and dog, Murphy. To learn more, visit her website: courtneymroch.com. Direct correspondence to Courtney Mroch or to editor@lifeloom.com

Defrosting a Cold Case:
How Author Dominick Dunne Helped Catch a Killer
            Sometimes murders go unsolved. Sometimes there are no suspects. Sometimes there is a suspect, but not enough evidence to pin a charge on him or her. Sometimes loved ones never get answers, comfort, or see justice delivered to the killers who robbed them of their husbands, wives, sons, or daughters.

            In Greenwich, Connecticut, on October 30, 1975, Dorothy and David Moxley lost their daughter, Martha, when she was brutally beaten to death with a golf club. The murder weapon came from a set of clubs belonging to the Moxley's neighbors, the Skakels. One of the Skakel boys, Tommy, was the last person seen with Martha the night she died. He became a prime suspect, but no charges were ever filed against him. No charges were ever filed against anyone. It seemed the Moxleys would be damned to the horrible fate of never seeing their daughter's killer brought to justice.

            On the night of October 30, 1975, known as Mischief Night in Martha's Greenwich neighborhood of Belle Haven, Martha's mom became suspicious when her daughter failed to come in at a decent time. It was a Thursday night, there was no school the next day, a perfect evening for kids to cut loose on the first night of a three-day weekend. Though Martha didn't have a specific curfew, she rarely abused the privilege by staying out until all hours. It wasn't until Martha's mom had exhausted all the neighbors' houses that she called police to report Martha missing at around 3:30 a.m.

            What could be worse for parents than not knowing where their child is? The anxiety, the worry, the anger. Martha's mother quickly found out there were many things worse than not knowing where her child was. Shortly after noon on October 31, 1975, one of Martha's friends was cutting through Martha's backyard to check to see if there was any word yet. That's when she saw Martha's body under a tree, her jeans pulled down, a piece of the golf club used to kill her sticking out of her neck. (The attack had been so vicious the golf club had broken into four pieces, the handle of which was never found.)

            Upon finding her daughter's body, Dorothy Moxley's nightmare escalated into something even worse – a living hell. Who would kill Martha? Why?

            As in all homicide cases, an investigation was immediately underway. But this was more than a homicide case. This was a case of murder in a place where the wealthiest lived, a place where evil deeds like murder were not supposed to happen. Especially not to fifteen-year-old girls. Belle Haven was an exclusive, gated community, where people belonged to country clubs and yacht clubs. In murder mystery books it might make an intriguing setting for a murder, but in real life murder just was not supposed to happen here. And when it did, it went unsolved for nearly twenty-five years.

            This horror trumps all others Dorothy Moxley felt – knowing her child had been slain, suspecting that either someone in her neighbor's house was the culprit or knew who was, and not having any way to prove it. Not being able to see justice done was hell on earth. .

            Why couldn't police solve the case? They were more than capable of doing it, but did privilege, power, and money have a hand in it? Tommy Skakel, the prime suspect, was the son of Rushton Skakel, a Kennedy relative. Rushton, a widower whose wife had died in 1972, lived with his children, five boys and a daughter, across from the Moxleys. The Skakels were third generation Belle Haven residents. Old money. Staying power. The Moxleys had moved to Belle Haven only a year before, from California. It shouldn't have mattered who lived there longer, who was related to who, who had more money. Yet, somehow it did. (Even though to this day Greenwich police would deny otherwise.)

            Having to look at the house where her daughter's killer might be living freely finally caused the Moxleys to relocate to New York. When her husband died, Dorothy Moxley moved to Annapolis, Maryland. It was there, in 1991, after sixteen years of learning to cope with the reality that finding Martha's killer was not meant to be, that she received a call from a man who had also had a daughter murdered. Though his case was no connection to hers, he felt he could help her. His name was Dominick Dunne, a writer who, at that time, had just had three best-selling novels made into successful television miniseries. After talking with Mrs. Moxley, he felt he could renew interest in her case by writing a book about it. Perhaps they could see justice done after all.

            It was that chance meeting, Mr. Dunne taking the initiative to contact Mrs. Moxley, and her finally agreeing to meet with him, that set the ball in motion for a series of events that finally brought answers, a conviction, and justice.

            Dominick Dunne's A Season of Purgatory was released in 1993. It was a work of fiction, but it was based on the events that happened in Greenwich, Connecticut on October 30, 1975. He changed the names, the characteristics of the Skakel family, and used a different murder weapon so as to avoid a lawsuit, but it was the Moxley murder. The CBS Evening News gave it a lot of exposure. Interest in the Martha Moxley cold case was rekindled.

            During a book tour, Mr. Dunne was approached by an African American woman in the Tattered Cover bookstore in Denver, Colorado. She had crime scene photos of Martha's body, as she had once worked on the Greenwich Police force. She didn't want Dunne to use her name, so in his book, Justice: Crimes, Trials, and Punishments, he doesn't. However, she did assert upon the conclusion of their meeting that Tommy Skakel, the prime suspect, didn't do it. This stunned Dunne, because he was positive, based on the facts he knew then, that Tommy must have done it. .

            In 1996, A Season of Purgatory, the television miniseries, aired. Seven months later, Dominick Dunne received crucial information from another informant, who also asked to remain anonymous. This information has since become known as the Sutton Report, a report compiled by a private detective Rushton Skakel hired to look into Martha Moxley's murder and his son's possible involvement. The report agreed with what the African American woman had told Dunne: Tommy Skakel most likely had not killed Martha Moxley. In all probability, his younger brother, Michael, age fifteen at the time of the murder, had.

            Frank Garr, a Greenwich detective who had worked on the case since the beginning, attained a copy of the report, but nothing came of it. No charges were filed against Michael. The matter might have stayed closed if not for one more chance encounter.

            Lucianne Goldberg, the literary agent for Mark Fuhrman (yes, from the infamous O.J. Simpson trial), called Dunne to ask if he had any leads on anything where Fuhrman could turn his detective skills. Fuhrman's first book, Murder in Brentwood, had turned out to be a success. Dunne knew just the topic and case for Fuhrman – the Moxley cold case.

            Released in 1999, Fuhrman's Murder in Greenwich cast even more exposure on the case. Dunne asserts that it was Fuhrman's book that led to the grand jury indictment of Michael Skakel twenty-five years after Martha's murder. (And ultimately to Michael's conviction twenty-seven years later, on June 7, 2002, when he was sentenced to twenty years behind bars.) But would Fuhrman still have ended up being guided to the case if Dunne hadn't directed him there? It was Dunne's interest, after all, that had truly taken the Moxley cold case out of the freezer and laid it on the counter to thaw.

            Dorothy Moxley's husband hadn't lived to see the day his daughter's killer was tried and convicted, but she had. There's no telling if her heart found peace afterwards or not, but at least the wondering was over. She hadn't been powerful enough on her own to bring Martha's killer to justice, but she certainly ended up having a lot of help. Starting with Dominick Dunne. Thanks to him, brave people, who were also variously connected to the case and wanted to see justice done, took the initiative to step forward with information they had. The combined effects caught a killer, and provided some measure of comfort to Martha's mother.

Copyright 2004 by Courtney Mr

 :tup:  :tup:  :tup:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Stand and fight, till there is no more.