scottT,
What were Bill Clinton's original remarks when first accused of having a relationship with Monica? He denied all of the accusations; all of a sudden he had difficulties with the "American language"? Then was forced to retract all of his twisted statements to later become "guilty"!!! Sound familiar? Ever watched this plot develop?
I can't imagine WWASPS beating their own drum. The facts out weight anything they can post on success, graduation, etc... They don't believe in real numbers...NO ONE has ever seen the actual numbers of students enrolled, the children who were removed, total number of graduates, etc... Because we all know "drop outs" don't exists. Their other side to this coin is the term ?success? & how it differs from one to another? Then again, why were they forced to close 4-5 of their campuses? Their schools are accredited through an association which is compromised of WWASPS flunkies.
The NYT article was not a harsh piece by any means. I believe it was factual in the sense of what the writer intended. He was attempting to enlighten readers concerning our American youth & options parents are choosing to deal with "out of control" children today.
Contrary to WWASPS beliefs, they are their own assassins by allowing these legacies to continue behind their walls. Who cares if it?s Catholic priest, Baptist ministers, or Mormons? Regardless, they ALL need to be prosecuted!!! By all means Ken Lay is just as responsible for Enron; as King Kay is responsible for WWASPS AND all of the LLC's, INC'S, & any other entities they have created to wart off liability. The corporate response, along with the smoke, mirrors, LLC's, Inc's, etc...that they have created & constructed on paper appear to currently protect their back sides.
Only time will tell. I have a feeling that once the dust settles from the initial filing, many so called followers will sober up & become plaintiffs as well.
Regards,
Lee