The letter from the California State Medical Board Executive Office states that “This case has been thoughtfully and extensively reviewed.†It is clear from the disparity of the content of that letter from the Reprimand issued by the medical board that this is not the case.
The letter from the Medical Board of California erroneously claims, “Because the expert made no finding relating to anything other than record keeping, the office of the Attorney General could not charge any other violation of the law.â€
The falsehood of that statement can be discerned by actually reading the Order of the Public Letter of Reprimand and the Public letter of Reprimand.
The letter signed by Barb Johnston acknowledges that the medical board is “obligated to operate within the parameters of the laws established for that agency.â€
According to Business and Professions code sections 2233-2233. “The board may, by stipulation or settlement with the affected physician and surgeon, issue a public letter of reprimand after it has conducted an investigation or inspection as provided in this article, rather than filing or prosecuting a formal accusation. Use of a public reprimand shall be limited to minor violations and shall be issued under guide lines established by regulations of the board.â€