Author Topic: "TheWho"'s True Identity (Read 52888 times)

Anonymous · « **Reply #150 on:** July 06, 2009, 10:18:50 PM »

Quote from: "RobertBruce"

Quote
But, Elvis has left the building Bruce!

Has he? How would you know? If he has what difference would it make? He still apparently originated the post.

You still assume that I play the same games as you Peter, I don't need to back peddal, I stand behind my statements. Care to address the ones you've been too afraid to acknowledge?

Case in point: I still believe your son Mike Dunbar to have killed himself. If he hasn't then just say so. Simple as that Peter.

The burden of proof for that death is on you, RobertBruce. Elvis never claimed that Whooter's son "Mike Dunbar" killed himself, just that Whooter's son is now dead and plus his identity was not given. Go back and check the post, he can't edit it.

I could just as easily claim that your mother is dead, she must have killed herself, after all a life with RobertBruce as a son is enough to do that to a person. How does 10 or 20 pages of posts on that fantasy sound?

RobertBruce · « **Reply #151 on:** July 06, 2009, 10:28:28 PM »

Awww Petey did we touch a nerve? Looks like it.

I'm going to give you your usual chance to retract your statement before I prove you wrong and shame you once again. You've got five minutes.

RobertBruce · « **Reply #152 on:** July 06, 2009, 10:35:39 PM »

Time's up.

viewtopic.php?f=41&t=27535&start=30

Take a look for yourself Peter. I made a comment regarding your imaginary daughter. Someone presumably Elvis, but possibly you as everyone on here knows all the games you like to play, stated that you actually had a son, who had killed himself.

I then replied by asking you if that was true.

Feel the need to go back and edit your post now Peter? Too bad you can't. Stings doesnt it?

Anonymous · « **Reply #153 on:** July 06, 2009, 10:38:48 PM »

Awww Brucey did we touch a nerve? Looks like it.

Speaking of "shame", this sounds about right:

Quote from: "Guest"

I could just as easily claim that your mother is dead, she must have killed herself, after all a life with RobertBruce as a son is enough to do that to a person. How does 10 or 20 pages of posts on that fantasy sound?

As to what my basis is for believing RobertBruce's mother is dead? The same as everyone else on here; somebody's comment. Plus that coupled with the fact that most people would kill themselves versus a life spent with RobertBruce.

Doesn't feel so nice, does it?

RobertBruce · « **Reply #154 on:** July 06, 2009, 10:43:39 PM »

It feels fine, my mother isn't dead, so why would it bother me? Your son apparently is, so it bothers you. I don't have any problems saying that, again I would have killed myself if I was your son too. I'm surprised the other one hasnt. You are getting back exactly what you put out here Peter, don't cry about it now. The only one with touched nerves and watery eyes is you. If your son isn't dead, or if he died in a different manner just say so, and I'll apologize and drop the matter entirely.

Oh and just to clear up your other misconception. Here is the first mention of your son by name, by a poster other than myself:

viewtopic.php?f=48&t=27884&p=335901&hilit=mike#p335901

Anonymous · « **Reply #155 on:** July 06, 2009, 10:47:34 PM »

Quote from: "Guest"

Awww Brucey did we touch a nerve? Looks like it.

Speaking of "shame", this sounds about right:

Quote from: "Guest"
I could just as easily claim that your mother is dead, she must have killed herself, after all a life with RobertBruce as a son is enough to do that to a person. How does 10 or 20 pages of posts on that fantasy sound?

As to what my basis is for believing RobertBruce's mother is dead? The same as everyone else on here; somebody's comment. Plus that coupled with the fact that most people would kill themselves versus a life spent with RobertBruce.

Doesn't feel so nice, does it?

If you, peter, had a son and he killed himself, its because of you and what you did to him. Any reasonable person would come to the same conclusion. You are incontrovertibly insane or sadistic. Either way, there is something deeply wrong with you that would be difficult to get through even without the torture of ASR. You should really be deeply, deeply ashamed of yourself.

Anonymous · « **Reply #156 on:** July 06, 2009, 10:48:30 PM »

Quote from: "RobertBruce"

Time's up.

viewtopic.php?f=41&t=27535&start=30

Take a look for yourself Peter. I made a comment regarding your imaginary daughter. Someone presumably Elvis, but possibly you as everyone on here knows all the games you like to play, stated that you actually had a son, who had killed himself.

I then replied by asking you if that was true.

Feel the need to go back and edit your post now Peter? Too bad you can't. Stings doesnt it?

Ha,ha,ha you can't even find the right forum, not to mention post! Here it is, knock yourself out:

viewtopic.php?f=9&t=27732&start=30#p334066

RobertBruce · « **Reply #157 on:** July 06, 2009, 10:50:41 PM »

Maybe that's why he can't ever acknowledge the truth about these places or admit when he's wrong. Doing so would mean he would have to accept respondsibility for his sons death. If it wasn't such a horrible person it would be sad. Clear the air for us one way or the other Peter. Either way I'll move on.

RobertBruce · « **Reply #158 on:** July 06, 2009, 10:55:01 PM »

Peter refer back to your earlier posts if you need help. You claimed the burden for your sons suicide was on me. You claimed that no one else had stated that Elvis had stated your son had simply died, not killed himself, and that I ran with the whole thing.

I simply proved you wrong.

I showed you when and where the conversation took place where I was first told that you had a son, and that the son had killed himself. No worries though Peter, I know you still can't handle this.

Your own link only highlights that the original claim came about during a conversation I wasn't apart of. Thanks for absolving me Pete!

Anonymous · « **Reply #159 on:** July 06, 2009, 11:04:41 PM »

Quote from: "RobertBruce"

Peter refer back to your earlier posts if you need help. You claimed the burden for your sons suicide was on me. You claimed that no one else had stated that Elvis had stated your son had simply died, not killed himself, and that I ran with the whole thing.

I simply proved you wrong.

I showed you when and where the conversation took place where I was first told that you had a son, and that the son had killed himself. No worries though Peter, I know you still can't handle this.

Your own link only highlights that the original claim came about during a conversation I wasn't apart of. Thanks for absolving me Pete!

Oh it's quite clear that you're not the only one making a fool out of themselves here.

RobertBruce · « **Reply #160 on:** July 06, 2009, 11:06:56 PM »

Quote

Peter, do you really need to compare which of the two of us has had to go back and edit posts more. I know you dont want to be that embarrassed.

Just because I can't resist:

After doing a quick search it appears over the past four years I have edited my post a grand total of 25 times.

Peter Dunbar aka TheWho meanwhile has 25 pages of posting searched for under the same criteria. I incidentally had 5. It took me all 5 of those pages to come up with my 25. It took 2 to reach 25 for Peter. Imagine how high it would have gotten had I included the other 23?

RobertBruce · « **Reply #161 on:** July 06, 2009, 11:09:50 PM »

Quote

Oh it's quite clear that you're not the only one making a fool out of themselves here.

Does that include you Pete? Afterall it was you who was proven wrong here. You claimed the burden of proof was on me for a claim I didn't originate. Why the sudden back peddaling Pete?

TheWho · « **Reply #162 on:** July 06, 2009, 11:23:34 PM »

Quote from: "Guest"

Quote from: "RobertBruce"
Time's up.

viewtopic.php?f=41&t=27535&start=30

Take a look for yourself Peter. I made a comment regarding your imaginary daughter. Someone presumably Elvis, but possibly you as everyone on here knows all the games you like to play, stated that you actually had a son, who had killed himself.

I then replied by asking you if that was true.

Feel the need to go back and edit your post now Peter? Too bad you can't. Stings doesnt it?

Ha,ha,ha you can't even find the right forum, not to mention post! Here it is, knock yourself out:

viewtopic.php?f=9&t=27732&start=30#p334066

Geeesh, I leave for awhile and I get trolled... at least get it right guest ...its: Ha,Ha,Ha

Anonymous · « **Reply #163 on:** July 06, 2009, 11:25:48 PM »

Quote from: "RobertBruce"

Quote
Oh it's quite clear that you're not the only one making a fool out of themselves here.

Does that include you Pete? Afterall it was you who was proven wrong here. You claimed the burden of proof was on me for a claim I didn't originate. Why the sudden back peddaling Pete?

Re-read the post. It was in response to a post by you.

Whether or not you originated the rumor of "Pete Dunbar" is immaterial if you continue to state it despite repeated requests for proof, which have not been forthcoming.

The burden of proof rests on all who continue to state the rumor. Feel better?

RobertBruce · « **Reply #164 on:** July 06, 2009, 11:28:21 PM »

I guess the grave yard shift in Peter's brain is taking over, another personality has assumed control. With that I'll say good night for now. Give serious considerating to having all your posts linked up Peter. I know you hate it but I'm not going to stop holding you accountable. This is your chance to finally be honest for a change. Give it some thought .Night.

Fornits
Fornits Home for Wayward Web Fora
An open discussion about the troubled parent industry