Author Topic: "TheWho"'s True Identity  (Read 61873 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Revenge Fantasy Girl

  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #135 on: July 06, 2009, 09:15:36 PM »
The proof is in the pudding. Let's have a taste.
Hmmm?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #136 on: July 06, 2009, 09:16:59 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
Can we get a photo of Peter Dunbar up? Thanks

Why don't we post a photo of YOU first. After all, you have more to do with Whooter than Peter Dunbar does.

Think of it, Whooter actually wants you to focus more on "Pete." Is there enough of a connection between two brain cells that might enable you to understand why?

Try, just try to remember all the hysteria over that innocent schmuck over in Newton, Mass. that you were all lighting the torches for. Whooter had a good laugh over that at your expense. Still continues to bring it up. I can guarantee you he'll be bringing this one up for years to come.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #137 on: July 06, 2009, 09:20:35 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
Can we get a photo of Peter Dunbar up? Thanks

Mike Dunbar
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #138 on: July 06, 2009, 09:27:24 PM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
I have no idea if his kid is dead or not. Again I believe it, but Peter has an opportunity to clear the air right here.

Peter Dunbar, is your son Mike dead or alive?


Can everyone start to see the back peddling... ever so slightly trying to distance himself from the mess he caused himself.  In a few days we will be hearing how he had no part in this at all and he was just on the sidelines like everyone else(after he edits his posts).

"Peter Dunbar?  What is everyone talking about?  That wasnt me...it was thewho making it up the whole time.  Thewho is trying to smear my name again!!  Please you have to believe me!!"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #139 on: July 06, 2009, 09:37:17 PM »
Peter Dunbar, being thewho, has never been able to smear my or anyone elses name. He makes up ridiculus claims, and later denies having made them as he is a coward. He is an impotent child who is incapable of accomplishing anything against anyone save making himself look really, really stupid.

Here Peter, quote this as fast as you can:

I have no idea if Mike Dunbar is dead, but I believe the claim having been made, I believe by Elvis. If you state for the record that he is not dead, then I'll take that at face value and apologize to Mike should he make an appearance on this board. Either way, I had nothing to do with originating the claim.

Peter Dunbar is thewho. I stand by that unequivocally. I was among the first to see the information, and have seen coroborating evidence first hand.

Anything else Peter? Let me know, and get on those questions or as I mentioned earlier, more information will come to light.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #140 on: July 06, 2009, 09:41:19 PM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
Peter Dunbar, being thewho, has never been able to smear my or anyone elses name. He makes up ridiculus claims, and later denies having made them as he is a coward. He is an impotent child who is incapable of accomplishing anything against anyone save making himself look really, really stupid.

Here Peter, quote this as fast as you can:

I have no idea if Mike Dunbar is dead, but I believe the claim having been made, I believe by Elvis. If you state for the record that he is not dead, then I'll take that at face value and apologize to Mike should he make an appearance on this board. Either way, I had nothing to do with originating the claim.

Peter Dunbar is thewho. I stand by that unequivocally. I was among the first to see the information, and have seen coroborating evidence first hand.

Anything else Peter? Let me know, and get on those questions or as I mentioned earlier, more information will come to light.

Quoted for posterity.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #141 on: July 06, 2009, 09:46:05 PM »
Quote
Nope, sorry. There are other forums for that if that's what you need

This forum is designed to be honest about this industry, hence the problem with Peter thewho, and most of the programmies on here. They are liars who are afraid of the truth.
If they were honest in their approach and discussion despite having a different opinion, there wouldnt be nearly the issue.

Quote
Maybe so, but he has just as much right to be here as anyone else. Everyone else exploits the anonymity of the guest option too. Why a different standard for Whooter?


Peter thewho does it as a means of distracting from important issues, burying the truth about himself, making it appear that there are many more supporters for his cause then are actually present, or attacking people from the shadows while trying to avoid accountablity. There isnt a different standard, survivors simply dont play the same game he does.

Quote
Yup, I remember that. Didn't sound like TheWho to me. Maybe you haven't been here long enough to recognize that. You think Whooter is the only troll around here? Have another cup of coffee. You need it.

It was Peter though. This is a perfect example of Peter playing from the shadows while attempting to avoid accountablility.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #142 on: July 06, 2009, 09:48:58 PM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
Peter Dunbar, being thewho, has never been able to smear my or anyone elses name. He makes up ridiculus claims, and later denies having made them as he is a coward. He is an impotent child who is incapable of accomplishing anything against anyone save making himself look really, really stupid.

Here Peter, quote this as fast as you can:

I have no idea if Mike Dunbar is dead, but I believe the claim having been made, I believe by Elvis. If you state for the record that he is not dead, then I'll take that at face value and apologize to Mike should he make an appearance on this board. Either way, I had nothing to do with originating the claim.

Peter Dunbar is thewho. I stand by that unequivocally. I was among the first to see the information, and have seen coroborating evidence first hand.

Anything else Peter? Let me know, and get on those questions or as I mentioned earlier, more information will come to light.

But, Elvis has left the building Bruce!

RobertBruce practicing
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #143 on: July 06, 2009, 09:49:12 PM »
Quote
Maybe so. But eventually he ends up digging his own grave that way. You are not helping your own credibility by engaging in the exact same kind of behavior.

Yet we're the ones who are honest on here, nor him or his ilk. The truth is on our side, hence why this industry is crumbling. Besides, the only obsessed with credibility here is Peter, the guy who never had any.

Quote
Maybe so. But eventually he ends up digging his own grave that way. You are not helping your own credibility by engaging in the exact same kind of behavior.

Peter was banned in the past for spamming, flooding, and impersonating other posters. He purposely sought out to disrupt the forum, and he was silenced for it. Where's the problem?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #144 on: July 06, 2009, 09:52:10 PM »
Quote
But, Elvis has left the building Bruce!

Has he? How would you know? If he has what difference would it make? He still apparently originated the post.

You still assume that I play the same games as you Peter, I don't need to back peddal, I stand behind my statements. Care to address the ones you've been too afraid to acknowledge?

Case in point: I still believe your son Mike Dunbar to have killed himself. If he hasn't then just say so. Simple as that Peter.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #145 on: July 06, 2009, 09:57:10 PM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
Quote
But, Elvis has left the building Bruce!

Has he? How would you know? If he has what difference would it make? He still apparently originated the post.

You still assume that I play the same games as you Peter, I don't need to back peddal, I stand behind my statements. Care to address the ones you've been too afraid to acknowledge?

Case in point: I still believe your son Mike Dunbar to have killed himself. If he hasn't then just say so. Simple as that Peter.

Where is the information onwhich you base your beliefs?  No obit, no link.  How did you arrive at this conclusion?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #146 on: July 06, 2009, 09:59:43 PM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
Quote
But, Elvis has left the building Bruce!

Has he? How would you know? If he has what difference would it make? He still apparently originated the post.

You still assume that I play the same games as you Peter, I don't need to back peddal, I stand behind my statements *. Care to address the ones you've been too afraid to acknowledge?

Case in point: I still believe your son Mike Dunbar to have killed himself. If he hasn't then just say so. Simple as that Peter.

*and when I dont I simply edit them.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #147 on: July 06, 2009, 10:03:25 PM »
Peter, do you really need to compare which of the two of us has had to go back and edit posts more. I know you dont want to be that embarrassed. I stand behind each one of my comments. If you have questions about my individual postings, by all means, ask. I'd be glad to educate you yet again

As to what my basis is for believing Mike Dunbar is dead? The same as everyone else on here; Elvis' comment. Plus that coupled with the fact that most people would kill themselves versus a life spent with Peter Dunbar.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #148 on: July 06, 2009, 10:08:24 PM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
Peter, do you really need to compare which of the two of us has had to go back and edit posts more. I know you dont want to be that embarrassed. I stand behind each one of my comments *. If you have questions about my individual postings, by all means, ask. I'd be glad to educate you yet again

As to what my basis is for believing Mike Dunbar is dead? The same as everyone else on here; Elvis' comment. Plus that coupled with the fact that most people would kill themselves versus a life spent with Peter Dunbar.

Ladies and Gentlemen Elvis has left the building!!

RobertBruce speeding up

*and when I dont I simply edit them.  (Sorry Bruce, cant let you off the hook)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "TheWho"'s True Identity
« Reply #149 on: July 06, 2009, 10:10:53 PM »
Hahahaha

For what Peter?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »