Author Topic: List of children being currently victimized at CALO, offsite (Read 16065 times)

Anonymous · « **on:** June 24, 2009, 05:52:23 PM »

Good luck using the DMCA on a Canadian server

This totals to 33 children being victimized, minus one escapee and "graduates", plus however much fresh meat Ken's managed to lie his way into getting.

Anonymous · « **Reply #1 on:** June 24, 2009, 06:15:21 PM »

This will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Anonymous · « **Reply #2 on:** June 24, 2009, 06:19:24 PM »

Quote from: "bobpeterson1973"

This will be interesting to see how this plays out.

I LOVE YOU GUYS.!!!!!!

Anonymous · « **Reply #3 on:** June 24, 2009, 06:26:46 PM »

Clever maneuver.

psy · « **Reply #4 on:** June 24, 2009, 06:28:22 PM »

Ya. As far as I know, the Canadians seem to be rejecting their own version of the DMCA.

http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/06/24 ... ?art_pos=7

The rest of their law on free speech still sucks, though.

psy · « **Reply #5 on:** June 24, 2009, 06:42:52 PM »

Interesting. It's a simple list of names that can only be found through fornits but the list of names itself cannot be followed back to fornits. If somebody stumbles across or searches for the names, by itself, it's meaningless, and there is no indication the kids have anything to do with a program... It's just a meaningless list of names.

Anonymous · « **Reply #6 on:** June 24, 2009, 06:56:45 PM »

Quote from: "psy"

Interesting. It's a simple list of names that can only be found through fornits but the list of names itself cannot be followed back to fornits. If somebody stumbles across or searches for the names, by itself, it's meaningless, and there is no indication the kids have anything to do with a program... It's just a meaningless list of names.

I suppose you'll rat out the OP to Ken Huey like you did last time?

psy · « **Reply #7 on:** June 24, 2009, 07:02:19 PM »

Quote from: "kenhueyisaprick"

I suppose you'll rat out the OP to Ken Huey like you did last time?

Say what? Nobody ratted anybody out. I don't even know who the OP is (though I have my guesses). Even if I wanted to, I couldn't.

Anonymous · « **Reply #8 on:** June 24, 2009, 07:03:20 PM »

Thank you for that site. The points psy makes are good. You should add perspective about why these names are relevant: they are detainees, and so on, at change academy lake of the ozarks. Maybe link the names of the "parents" who have already been identified. Thanks so much.

Anonymous · « **Reply #9 on:** June 24, 2009, 07:17:16 PM »

I begin to agree with the others that there is something off going on. I can't say the name '[Redacted due to DMCA claim]'?
or that she is the daughter of Theresa sebonis-helf. She is. That has nothing to do with any email.

psy · « **Reply #10 on:** June 24, 2009, 07:18:56 PM »

Quote from: "[Redacted due to [url=http://www.fornits.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=27785

DMCA claim[/url]] sebonis helf"]I begin to agree with the others that there is something off going on. I can't say the name '[Redacted due to DMCA claim]'?
or that she is the daughter of Theresa sebonis-helf. She is. That has nothing to do with any email.

So file a counternotice. It's out of my hands.

Anonymous · « **Reply #11 on:** June 24, 2009, 07:20:25 PM »

Quote from: "psy"

Quote from: "kenhueyisaprick"
I suppose you'll rat out the OP to Ken Huey like you did last time?
Say what? Nobody ratted anybody out. I don't even know who the OP is (though I have my guesses). Even if I wanted to, I couldn't.

You are living a pipe dream with your lies.

psy · « **Reply #12 on:** June 24, 2009, 07:35:39 PM »

Quote from: "psy is a rat"

Quote from: "psy"
Quote from: "kenhueyisaprick"
I suppose you'll rat out the OP to Ken Huey like you did last time?
Say what? Nobody ratted anybody out. I don't even know who the OP is (though I have my guesses). Even if I wanted to, I couldn't.

You are living a pipe dream with your lies.

How could I rat anybody out, Again? I told anybody even possibly connected to this that I did not want to know who who well proxied was. Ask Aaron. If you have a rat it's not me, and when you find out who it is in time, I hope you have the common courtesy to apologize.

Anonymous · « **Reply #13 on:** June 24, 2009, 07:38:34 PM »

I think what the poster PSY IS A RAT , is referring to you PSY

Is you mentioning you personally spoke with Ken Fooey
about the issue and found him to be such a charming man.
( not your exact words but close )

Then wham , all of a sudden Ken Fooey
is
(some kind of say what ?)

I can tell you , Ken is a snake Charmer
and possibly part of the old snake oil peddlers
( he could talk the pants off his own grandmother
and maybe even has a few times ?

Does it matter ?

Not really ,
Would I trust him w/ anyone I cared about
No Never !

Just a word of advice
snakes like Fooey , that is what they are good at ....
Clever Manipulation .
( preferring to stay secretive and in the shadows to collect the
money he needs to raise the 7-8 offspring his mormon religion
hopes will follow in his footsteps to have more money to keep
them afloat .
yeah its sick but true .
anybody here ever watch the stepford wives ?
thats the experience I had personally when I
visited Calo . ::puke::

psy · « **Reply #14 on:** June 24, 2009, 07:56:22 PM »

Quote from: "Fuel"

I think what the poster PSY IS A RAT , is referring to you PSY

Is you mentioning you personally spoke with Ken Fooey
about the issue and found him to be such a charming man.
( not your exact words but close )

Those were Ginger's words ("sounds like a sincere sort of fellow"), actually, unless you're accusing her of being a rat as well. Ya, we talked to Ken Huey. We had a conference call to discuss the issue of the posts on Fornits. We told him that we could not moderate and explained our position (the main purpose of the call). He told us his story from his perspective and we told him ours. It was an interesting chat. We explained why we felt that treatment without consent was always wrong. We explained a bit about thought reform, the stanford prison experiments. Lots of stuff. It was a fairly long call and most of the discussion was philosophical and from personal experience. AT NO POINT did we identify the original poster (who we do not know and do not want to know) and we made it very clear that while we would comply with any binding legal orders, we could not take action on our own, even though we might want to. At no point did we beg "please don't sue us" or make any sort of "deal" either.

Quote

Then wham , all of a sudden Ken Fooey
is
(some kind of say what ?)

I can tell you , Ken is a snake Charmer

Could be. I make no judgment any way. I hardly know the guy. Also keep in mind that I hardly trust anybody at all. I trust Ginger and a select few others, but that's about it. To say I trust some program director I barely met is a stretch at the very least.

Quote

and possibly part of the old snake oil peddlers
( he could talk the pants off his own grandmother
and maybe even has a few times ?

Does it matter ?

Not really ,
Would I trust him w/ anyone I cared about
No Never !

I was raised in a family of diplomats (literally). Just because you're polite and cordial with a person does not mean you trust them.

So is there any evidence against me other than that Ginger said he sounded like he was a "sincere sort of fellow"? If this speculation and raving suspicion is enough to hang your enemies, you kill your own case against CALO.

Fornits
Fornits Home for Wayward Web Fora
An open discussion about the troubled parent industry