« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Intrepid Net Reporter  (Read 9029 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Intrepid Net Reporter
« Reply #30 on: August 05, 2003, 02:54:00 PM »
I think SCAREY CAREY :skull:  is SCHIZO! I know didnt spell it right, but she must know how since she is a writer.  Her Obession with Sue Scheff/Ryan/Coldwater/and every other person is really SICK!!!  Doesnt she get we dont CARE!!! Yes I am ANON. SO  WHAT.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Intrepid Net Reporter
« Reply #31 on: August 05, 2003, 03:04:00 PM »
Lee

I was just going back to the the Anon (probably the same Anon who posted prvious to my post now) who told a lie.  Here let me quote what Anon said:

Quote
I asked Ryan; b/c of his movie rights the director asked for it to be pulled down. It had nothing to do with Sue, and Sue only honored what they asked her to do. So, get off it already.

 
I think accurate information and the truth are important.

And Lee, I think Ryan is still hurting his creditability by endorsing a FICTION film.

Its all important!!!!

I am sure I am scary to those of you who have had another agenda all along.

[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2003-08-05 12:05 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline turbinekat

  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Intrepid Net Reporter
« Reply #32 on: August 05, 2003, 03:54:00 PM »
Carey,

That's Ryan's business...NOT yours!  When did YOU become his parental responsibility?  Did you obtain permission from Ryan's parent to post his email statments?  Just a thought, you may have set your self up again!

I believe the trail of emails you have do not include ALL of them.  You trashed Sue about Ryan on her web site.  Then YOU contacted Ryan & asked him to remove his post from her sight.  Then the director also contacted Sue to ask that Ryan?s post be removed.

In response to YOU thinking that YOU controlled the whole matter...YOU didn't!!!  It was removed because Ryan personally asked that it be removed at his director's request.  Now, get your accurate information straight & NOT just YOUR side to the story!

After that was said & done...You then proceeded to attack Ryan & his parents for allowing him to consult on a movie project.  Why do YOU personally think YOU should be the deciding factor as to what everyone does?

Believe me, NO one is afraid of YOU.  I?m tired of YOUR tactics & YOUR efforts to distort the truth & bully everyone.  You don't have a clue as to what you are up against!!!  I for one consider you as comical entertainment & enjoy watching YOUR he said; she said antics.

Your attention should be concentrated on YOUR children, ex husband & court proceedings.  NOT minding everyone else's business!!!

Regards,

Lee





[ This Message was edited by: turbinekat on 2003-08-05 13:00 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Intrepid Net Reporter
« Reply #33 on: August 05, 2003, 04:01:00 PM »
HELL, DONT FLATTER YOURSELF CAREY, WE ARE NOT AFRAID OF YOU, YOU ARE JUST SCARY AS A PERSON. HONESTLY, YOU DO HAVE MANY HANG UPS ON CERTAIN ISSUES YOU CANT LET GO OF.  EVERY THINK OF GETTING HELP?  SURE YOU CAN WRITE, BUT HAVING YOUR FACULITES WOULD HELP TOO.

I DITTO TURBINEKAT/LEE.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Intrepid Net Reporter
« Reply #34 on: August 05, 2003, 04:13:00 PM »
Lee,

I have the email from my correspondence with the director of the film, Sean.  When I get home this evening I will post that too.  I also convinced him it should be removed.  I want to make sure everyone knows the truth.


Quote
You trashed Sue about Ryan on her web site. Then YOU contacted Ryan & asked him to remove his post from her sight. Then the director also contacted Sue to ask that Ryan?s post be removed.


Lee I am curious, have you been talking to Sue?  Just wandering where you are getting your information from since you were not privy to ANY of the conversations.  Karen tends to do the same thing.  She too talks a lot about things she has not been a part of.

By the way, are you and Nancy still on Sue's list as personal references?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Intrepid Net Reporter
« Reply #35 on: August 05, 2003, 04:55:00 PM »
Still waiting patiently for an answer from someone about why the death of Donna Headrick is not mentioned on the websites.  This seems rather sad, don't you think? :???:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Intrepid Net Reporter
« Reply #36 on: August 05, 2003, 05:20:00 PM »
Yeah, it's very sad.  Guess nothing is sacred in this business.

 :smokin:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline anon

  • Posts: 267
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Intrepid Net Reporter
« Reply #37 on: August 05, 2003, 06:25:00 PM »
[ This Message was edited by: KarenZ on 2003-10-17 10:07 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Intrepid Net Reporter
« Reply #38 on: August 05, 2003, 07:13:00 PM »
Lee,

You said, and I quote:

Quote
In response to YOU thinking that YOU controlled the whole matter...YOU didn't!!! It was removed because Ryan personally asked that it be removed at his director's request. Now, get your accurate information straight & NOT just YOUR side to the story!

Here is one of the emails between me and the director of Coldwater:

Quote
Subj: Re: (no subject)  
Date: 7/19/03 1:52:26 PM Central Daylight Time
From: Careycbock@aol.com
Sent from the Internet (Details)
 
Ryan is in no way associated with Sue Scheff. They have corresponded in the past, but he does not have any affiliation whatsoever. We have done due diligence on Ryan and he is an advocate of teens and stopping the abuse. I can't discuss it in any greater detail, but rest assured we are doing our best to have the utmost integrity with our film.  FYI: the link to Help Your Teens is coming down, until we can investigate it further.


Thanks so much.


sean


Sean,

You are going to have some problems on your hand with Ryan and his association with your film.    He is affiliated with Sue Scheff of Pure, Inc.  Anyone who is affiliated with her will be sued by WWASP and will be found not creditable.  What she does is exactly the same as those who work for WWASP.


Carey


Now if you look at the time on Ryan's email it was before I spoke with the director of Coldwater.  I believe my speaking with both of them played a part in the removal of Ryan's letter from the PURE, Inc. website.

This is a start.  He is still endorsing the FICTION movie which will still cause problems, maybe just not as big of problems.

Sure seems like the FICTION movie would be a bigger risk than had the pictures that Chris has kept hidden been exposed.  Afterall if the media could have gotten a hold of those, Casa might be closed today.  How many children are there?  Just think they could all be home right now.  And you know what, those pictures would still be evidence that could be used in court. Kinda like the Rodney King video.  Ya know what I mean.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Intrepid Net Reporter
« Reply #39 on: August 05, 2003, 09:00:00 PM »
:flame:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Intrepid Net Reporter
« Reply #40 on: August 05, 2003, 09:58:00 PM »
Is this another made up accusation?  Pictures someone says they have of something.  Hidden?? If there are photos, they will come out in court, don't you think??  I agree that the creditability of the witnesses are crashing and burning.   :flame:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline turbinekat

  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Intrepid Net Reporter
« Reply #41 on: August 06, 2003, 03:11:00 AM »
Quote
On 2003-08-05 13:13:00, Carey wrote:

Lee I am curious, have you been talking to Sue?  Just wandering where you are getting your information from since you were not privy to ANY of the conversations.  Karen tends to do the same thing.  She too talks a lot about things she has not been a part of.

YOU are correct, YOU are "wandering"!!!  Back to the part YOU have yet to understand!!!  

I've yet to see your proof?  YOU have continued to leave out a few emails again, haven't YOU Carey?  You amaze ME with YOUR one sidedness or should we say, "Carey Convenience".

How do you know who was privy & who wasn't?    Again, your mouth has overloaded you rear end, you have double talked all around the matter.  YOU again, have appointed yourself the expert on the subject matter.

Now, I'm associated with Karen & Sue according to YOU.  Carey, you continue to ass/u/me everything to your liking?  What ever floats your boat?  At least get your oars in the water, though.

Quote
By the way, are you and Nancy still on Sue's list as personal references?"


Your facts again are slanted in your favor!!!  Yes, I believe we are listed as "parent volunteers".  Now, I'll let you tell fornits & me what that means.  Since you are the rocket scientist in the group?  I don't think your bank title makes you a child specialist either nor affiliated with another bank in the industry, does it?

Cheap, very cheap, entertainment!!!

Regards,

Lee
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline turbinekat

  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Intrepid Net Reporter
« Reply #42 on: August 06, 2003, 03:32:00 AM »
Quote

Sure seems like the FICTION movie would be a bigger risk than had the pictures that Chris has kept hidden been exposed.  Afterall if the media could have gotten a hold of those, Casa might be closed today.  How many children are there?  Just think they could all be home right now.  And you know what, those pictures would still be evidence that could be used in court. Kinda like the Rodney King video.  Ya know what I mean. "


Carey,

Again, you?re off the wall!  You have ass/u/me, I don't think the movie will have any affect on anything I do in life I very rarely attend any movie theaters.  That maybe part of your problem, YOU may watch to may.

If I'm not mistaken, "Rodney King" is back in jail & I don't know what you mean?

As far as Casa being closed, in my opinion it should have closed when high impact was targeted.  If I'm not mistaken it was reviewed at the same time & remained open for some reason or another.  I wasn't around when any of that transpired, kind of "BC" concerning me.  If I'm not mistaken, again, it may have been before YOU as well.  Which means, anything either of us knows about it would be considered "hearsay"; I believe that's the term?

Regards,

Lee
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »