What are the odds?

[Anonymous]

Also, regarding the "studies" "research" and "investigation"

Hazeldon claims they looked over data PROVIDED BY AARC only.

Enough with dropping the Hazeldon name in regards to valid studies already!!!

 :wall:

[Anonymous]

Also, regarding the "studies" "research" and "investigation"

Hazeldon claims they looked over data PROVIDED BY AARC only.

Enough with dropping the Hazeldon name in regards to valid studies already!!!

 :wall:

Mommy Dearest is really out of her league here! Hazeldon and particularly a PhD employed there were contracted to run the statistical analysis supplied by Michael Patton (look him up so you can get acquainted) Patton designed the research. Patton advised AARC on collecting the data, which AARC did. Patton contracted Hazelton to run the stats so AARC was not doing it, because that would be considered biased so YES, idiot, Hazeldon was involed with Patton in the design and ANALYSIS of the data.

What is your training? do you know how research is conducted? or you just follow Elliot's lead and shoot uneducated and inexperienced comments in with some delusional authority on research methods??  :wall:

PaaLEEZ let's hear a reply supplying us with some reason to think you know what was and was not done for the evaluation. I'll give you time to confer with your mentor/Elliot  LOL

[Anonymous]

by A mom on Yesterday, 09:26
So raising questions about the legitimacy of AARC, an unlicensed facility employing a former employee of Kids as the Executive Director, is outlandish and apparently constitutes a heinous crime.

I think NOT raising questions about the legitimacy of AARC, allowing unlicensed facilities to even exist, and not taking a very close look at the treatment practices of AARC BECAUSE it was created by a former employee of Kids would be outlandish and should constitute a heinous crime!

Elliot really has trained Mommy Dearest well - to keep on with the party line. Isthere any freach blood out there not someone from the wee group of dissidents that repeat what each other have said. In this case Tami has come along a long time after kids etc. and now she thinks she knows what happened at Kids and that it is the same as AARC after her whole week of treatment there. Tami have you actually spoken to someone who went to both places -  like Peter or Janne or . .oh did Elliot supply you with those names?  LOL

From what I've read, Kids of the Canadian West was put under a microscope by the Ministry of Health and Wellness and not allowed to fly, the SAME scrutiny should have been conducted regarding the AARC program WHEN IT STARTED, and even more importantly NOW that it's been running for years (unregulated).

Maybe you need to consider running for office, maybe that would change things. I am sure you are an upstanding individual with a lot to offer

The protection of youth should be a given... not an option.

ROFLMAO - in your case the protection of youth might have started with removing your kids from their home, don't you think - your comments to NOah show us how you treat a kid who admitted he had a problem. I can imagine how you would have treated your kid if he had tried to admit a problem!

It is interesting though that you are so focused on these issues although you say your family was destroyed by AARC. Shouldn't you be dealing with that? or are you on the 5 days off I mean didn't you say that > 2 days a week to a program that might help your kid is excessive. I can really understand how you were grossly deceived when you thought AARC expected you to only commit to 2 days/week and then found out it was way more when your kid is in crisis.  pathetic . . . I would commit 7+ days per week and get whatever help I had to if my kid was in the crisis your kid obviously must have been in and I certainly would not have been running around judging all the other families at AARC for doing whatever they need to to deal with a family crisis. Why is it that you were the only one feeling 'abused' 'put out' 'misled'. Did you make any friends there or were they all just not your type of people?  . .well because they might stick around the drug rehab community a little to long for your 'healthy' view of things. They would be more healthy if they were out drinking and picking up people in the bar?