If you are curious about what is contained in the study, I would wholeheartedly encourage you to read the study. I would encourage anyone else who feels that the study itself, it's methodology, or the data contained therein are relevant to the discussions in this forum, to read the study and draw their own conclusions.
I think we can agree that everyone should read the study. But if you reference figures you claim came from the study you should be able to point to them or paste up a copy of the referenced piece. The following is a table taken from the study and I can provide a link for you if you like.
Take another look:Table 2 Longest period of
continuous sobriety of interviewed graduates, maintained by time since graduation
Time since graduation One month Six months Twelve months or more
One year or less (n=29) 0% 6.9%
93.1%Two to three years (n=42) 2.49% 4.8% 92.9%
Four or more years (n=14) 0% 14.3%
85.7%Toss up the relapse figures and we can compare them. Relapse isnt the end of the world. It will probably happen to almost all of them at some point so it is not something to be ashamed of. Just not sure where yur numbers came from. Is it something you made up?