Author Topic: Sue / Porn  (Read 1421 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue / Porn
« on: August 03, 2008, 09:01:28 PM »
Anyone else wonder why the porn surfaces when Sue topics surface?  I am begining to think it is some how Sue's way of derailing topics and questions about her.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Sue / Porn
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2008, 09:04:39 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
Anyone else wonder why the porn surfaces when Sue topics surface?  I am begining to think it is some how Sue's way of derailing topics and questions about her.

I have noticed this as well and, IMO, it is not a coincidence.  Unfortunately, Sue knows that the anonymity of this forum even applies to her and takes full advantage of it.  I can't imagine how frustrating it must be for Psy to know this to be true and still not be able to say anything about it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Sue / Porn
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2008, 10:46:35 PM »
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote from: "Guest"
Anyone else wonder why the porn surfaces when Sue topics surface?  I am begining to think it is some how Sue's way of derailing topics and questions about her.

I have noticed this as well and, IMO, it is not a coincidence.  Unfortunately, Sue knows that the anonymity of this forum even applies to her and takes full advantage of it.  I can't imagine how frustrating it must be for Psy to know this to be true and still not be able to say anything about it.

Spin doctoring? The one of you?  Why?  It wasn't a topic responsible for the porn, it was gookins bitchy, pissy arrival.

How come when sue scheff was posting the blogs about Joyce Harris, Psy, Ginger, Shelby, Buzzkill, she left out gookin?  She knew his name, his picture was up and as an ex or current program employee he should have been an easy mark. Remember all the lesbian stuff and threats he posted?  She didn't seem to care.  And he sent Sue someone to fill in for Ashlyn.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: Sue / Porn
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2008, 04:19:26 AM »
Quote from: "Augustine"
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote from: "Guest"
Anyone else wonder why the porn surfaces when Sue topics surface?  I am begining to think it is some how Sue's way of derailing topics and questions about her.

I have noticed this as well and, IMO, it is not a coincidence.  Unfortunately, Sue knows that the anonymity of this forum even applies to her and takes full advantage of it.  I can't imagine how frustrating it must be for Psy to know this to be true and still not be able to say anything about it.

Spin doctoring? The one of you?  Why?  It wasn't a topic responsible for the porn, it was gookins bitchy, pissy arrival.

How come when sue scheff was posting the blogs about Joyce Harris
Hates sue's guts, wrote a sworn statement for ISAC, and generally has been a thorn in Sue's side.
Quote
Psy
Google Sue Scheff.
Quote
Ginger
Pure forum, Fornits, humiliating defeat of SS in court by Phil Elberg on behalf of Ginger.
Quote
Shelby
ISAC has lots of info about SS's shenanigans.
Quote
Buzzkill
Check out some of the info Buzz has posted in the PURE/CAICA forum.
Quote
gookin
All in all, he hasn't done much to Sue that has actually affected her that much.
Quote
She knew his name, his picture was up and as an ex or current program employee he should have been an easy mark. Remember all the lesbian stuff and threats he posted?  She didn't seem to care.
I heard from the grape vine that she is fond of blaming those types of things on "somebody" else.  (Why place blame on somebody who isn't harming her when she could make her critics look juvenile by blaming his antics on other critics who do affect her...  It's not necessary to attack him.  He provides her with "evidence" she can hypothetically scatter around at will to steriotype her critics (Not that it's his fault.  I somehow suspect that if he didn't make it, she would create some.).  You want to see a gigantic example of a similar type of switcheround that goes on with sue? check this out.)

I suspect, though, that somebody's motive in posting porn here is to discredit Che, not with the public, but with the forum members here.  It's a simple strategy:  When Che shows up, post porn all over, following up with pictures of Zen's daughter and so forth.  It will get blamed on Che (because he might have done it once) and the resulting conflict will result in forum chaos, drama, and general "lulz" for whoever is posting the porn.  But what is the ultimate motive here?  It's to divide us, drive others off, and make it seem (even to us forum regulars) as if nothing can or ever will get done here.  It's a diversionary tactic.  A distraction.  A way to destroy this forum and ultimately... we let it happen.  It isn't Che.  It isn't Sue.  It's us.  it's our response.  It's the forum regulars who take the bait and respond to it by feeding the drama.  Without that, the tactic is useless.

One of my badass lawyers explained it to me like this:  It's like you're a heat seaking missile heading towards a plane, and they drop chaff (metal confetti) to distract you.  You can chase after the multitude of what you think is important... what they want you to go after... the emotional, the personal attacks, the irrelevant, etc... but you're going to ultimately miss your target... and that is what they want.  What they fear is you addressing the issues.

I'm not saying i'm not guilty of participating in the distraction, chasing after the irrelevant...  Far from it.  I've contributed my share towards the response that somebody would have wanted, but...  now that I realize it's just a distraction.. that i'm giving them what they want.  I'm going to do my best to ignore it, and I hope others will do the same.  Petty arguing, bitching, distraction, insults, etc...  All of it avoids the central issues here that NEED to be dealt with and addressed if there is to be any hope of getting down to the the business of organizing and fighting this industry effectively.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2008, 05:10:17 AM by psy »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Sue / Porn
« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2008, 09:00:36 AM »
Fantastic Post. 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Sue / Porn
« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2008, 05:29:45 PM »

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline seamus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 824
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Sue / Porn
« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2008, 03:31:09 PM »
So THAT'S what happened to sue scheffs husband. :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
It\'d be sad if it wernt so funny,It\'d be funny if it wernt so sad

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Sue / Porn
« Reply #7 on: August 07, 2008, 09:14:33 PM »
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »