Keep on Trukkin'

[ajax13]

This is another example of a blatant manipulation by the Wiz.  He uses this hack from the Union Institute to endorse AARC, a though McAndrews is an expert on adolescent addiciton treatment:

"Dr. Robert McAndrews, Professor at the Union Institute and second core reader of the Ph.D. by Dr. F. Dean Vause, stated in a letter date May 3, 1994: “Now that I see the ‘hard’ evidence and follow your thorough analysis, as a critical reviewer I am convinced that your model and actual program is one worth replicating everywhere possible…Your PDE research is scholarly, thorough, extensive, and analytical. I believe it may be the most complete piece of research available on youth addiction and treatment options.”

Here is McAndrew's education, which appears to entail nothing whatsoever to do with treating adolescent chemical dependence:

ROBERT MCANDREWS PHD

 

PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND

 

Education:

1979   Ph.D., Human Sciences, Saybrook Institute, San Francisco, CA. Dissertation: Journeys: An Inquiry into Meaning and Value.

1968   M.A., Social Anthropology, Manchester University (1977), Manchester, England. Thesis: The Yap Caste System and the Yap Empire: An Analysis of Their Relationship

1967   Postgraduate studies in Social Anthropology, London School of Economics, London, England

1966   MPIA (Masters in Public and International Affairs), Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Thesis: The Domestic and Foreign Contributions to the Overthrow of Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana

1962   B.A., Psychology, Sociology, Anthropology, State University of California at Northridge, CA

To dispel any doubt that this was the Wiz lying and manipulating others to meet his needs, here is the final mutation of McAndrews, expert on Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana and the Yap Empire, as told by Ron Stevens, MLA and AARC dupe:

"The AARC Model is unique in Calgary and perhaps the world and was developed based on the research and analysis of Dr. Vause.  It has been thoroughly reviewed by international addictions experts.  One of those experts, Dr. Robert McAndrews, concluded: now that I see the hard evidence and follow through your analysis, as a critical reviewer I am convinced that your model and actual program is one worth replicating everywhere possible.  Mr. Speaker, this is excellent advice which I encourage my colleagues to support."

Now who was involved in AARC that would create the lie that McAndrews was an addicitions expert?

Which brings to mind this:
"A number of mind-controlling cult leaders may exhibit many of the behavioral characteristics of a sociopath -- an outstanding ability to charm and seduce followers. Since they appear apparently normal, they are not easily recognizable as deviant or disturbed. Although only a trained professional can make a diagnosis of whether or not someone is a sociopath, it is important to be able to recognize the personality type in order to avoid further abuse. These traits also apply to a one-on-one cultic relationship. ... Glibness/Superficial Charm ... Manipulative and Conning ... Grandiose Sense of Self ... Pathological Lying ... Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt ... Shallow Emotions ... Incapacity for Love ... Need for Stimulation ... Callousness/Lack of Empathy ... Poor Behavioral Controls/Impulsive Nature ... Early Behavior Problems/Juvenile Delinquency ... Irresponsibility/Unreliability ... Promiscuous Sexual Behavior/Infidelity ... Lack of Realistic Life Plan/Parasitic Lifestyle ... Criminal or Entrepreneurial Versatility"
  

[ajax13]

Common characteristics of those with malignant narcissism include:


Grandiose sense of self-worth
Impulsiveness, doesn't finish projects, or attempts to finish a project too quickly to move onto something else
Reckless tendencies
Pathological lying or exaggeration of the truth
Shallow affect
Creates illusions of superiority
Strives for constant recognition or prestige
Exaggerates and boasts about accomplishments
Feels ashamed or attacked by negative judgments from others
Preoccupation with fantasies of a perfect partner or future
Lack of empathy or selective empathy
Pulls attention from everyone else onto themselves to feel unique
Tendency to idealize their own superiority, devalue other people's worth or accomplishments
Sensitivity to how others react to him/her
Inability to tolerate boredom
Manipulativeness
Indifference to or rationalizes having hurt or mistreated others (underdeveloped conscience)
Drug and alcohol abuse
Narcissistic rage

[ajax13]

This is another example of a blatant manipulation by the Wiz.  He uses this hack from the Union Institute to endorse AARC, a though McAndrews is an expert on adolescent addiciton treatment:

"Dr. Robert McAndrews, Professor at the Union Institute and second core reader of the Ph.D. by Dr. F. Dean Vause, stated in a letter date May 3, 1994: “Now that I see the ‘hard’ evidence and follow your thorough analysis, as a critical reviewer I am convinced that your model and actual program is one worth replicating everywhere possible…Your PDE research is scholarly, thorough, extensive, and analytical. I believe it may be the most complete piece of research available on youth addiction and treatment options.”

Here is McAndrew's education, which appears to entail nothing whatsoever to do with treating adolescent chemical dependence:

ROBERT MCANDREWS PHD

 

PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND

 

Education:

1979   Ph.D., Human Sciences, Saybrook Institute, San Francisco, CA. Dissertation: Journeys: An Inquiry into Meaning and Value.

1968   M.A., Social Anthropology, Manchester University (1977), Manchester, England. Thesis: The Yap Caste System and the Yap Empire: An Analysis of Their Relationship

1967   Postgraduate studies in Social Anthropology, London School of Economics, London, England

1966   MPIA (Masters in Public and International Affairs), Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Thesis: The Domestic and Foreign Contributions to the Overthrow of Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana

1962   B.A., Psychology, Sociology, Anthropology, State University of California at Northridge, CA

To dispel any doubt that this was the Wiz lying and manipulating others to meet his needs, here is the final mutation of McAndrews, expert on Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana and the Yap Empire, as told by Ron Stevens, MLA and AARC dupe:

"The AARC Model is unique in Calgary and perhaps the world and was developed based on the research and analysis of Dr. Vause.  It has been thoroughly reviewed by international addictions experts.  One of those experts, Dr. Robert McAndrews, concluded: now that I see the hard evidence and follow through your analysis, as a critical reviewer I am convinced that your model and actual program is one worth replicating everywhere possible.  Mr. Speaker, this is excellent advice which I encourage my colleagues to support."

Now who was involved in AARC that would create the lie that McAndrews was an addicitions expert?

Which brings to mind this:
"A number of mind-controlling cult leaders may exhibit many of the behavioral characteristics of a sociopath -- an outstanding ability to charm and seduce followers. Since they appear apparently normal, they are not easily recognizable as deviant or disturbed. Although only a trained professional can make a diagnosis of whether or not someone is a sociopath, it is important to be able to recognize the personality type in order to avoid further abuse. These traits also apply to a one-on-one cultic relationship. ... Glibness/Superficial Charm ... Manipulative and Conning ... Grandiose Sense of Self ... Pathological Lying ... Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt ... Shallow Emotions ... Incapacity for Love ... Need for Stimulation ... Callousness/Lack of Empathy ... Poor Behavioral Controls/Impulsive Nature ... Early Behavior Problems/Juvenile Delinquency ... Irresponsibility/Unreliability ... Promiscuous Sexual Behavior/Infidelity ... Lack of Realistic Life Plan/Parasitic Lifestyle ... Criminal or Entrepreneurial Versatility"
  

[TheWho]

Let me clear something up, people without the proper education should be exposed.  Look at Bill Gates spouting off like some software expert.  He couldn’t hack college and never even bothered to try to get an associate’s degree.  I have been exposing him for years (on other forums) and I finally got him to step down this year. 
I have moved on to Michael Dell, another loser, dropped out of college and hit his parents up for a loan to start Dell, Inc.  His head is so swollen because he thinks he knows about computer hardware and laptops.  He thinks this way because he surrounds himself with suckups who enable this type of thinking.  I will expose him soon, just you watch.

I am also working on exposing Richard Wagoner who is the CEO of General Motors Corp.  This guy has been claiming for years to know about the Auto industry, but a background check has revealed he has no degree in this field at all (zero experience).  In fact he doesn’t even Drive!!!!!  He has a personal driver!!  He will be easy to bring down.
 
Remember Socrates and Plato?  Yep, you got it, them too.  Not one day of formal training in the field of philosophy yet they spouted off as if they were experts.  People were so gullible back then. Of course they didn’t have me to point out peoples short comings and expose them. 
People often ask what training I have and you know what I tell them “it is none of your business!!!”, smart huh?.  I don’t ever want to put myself into a position where I can be criticized.  People ask me what qualifications the head of AARC should have, and you know what?  I don’t have to answer that if I don’t feel like it.

Another guy I could have brought down to my level is Sigmond Freud.  This fraud should have been thrown in jail and would have if I was around.  They didn’t have the internet back then to perform background checks but this guy had a doctorate alright but nothing in psychology, go figure.  The loser did his doctorate thesis on “the spinal cord of lower fish species”.  Was this guy wacked out or what?  Then goes on to pretend he knows what people are thinking about their own mother.  Spinless, right?  No pun intended.  Dont get me going again.  I dont think the wiz knows what he is up against.  I dont think anyone should persue a degree or educate themselves unless they are willing to be exposed as losers.

[Anonymous]

ajaxl3


Nice try, but we're not buying it.  Replacing the number ONE buy using a lower case "L" to make it appear the same, does not an Ajax13 make.

Now if you'll step to the side, our beautiful assistant has some lovely parting gifts for you.

[TheWho]

Let me clear something up, people without the proper education should be exposed.  Look at Bill Gates spouting off like some software expert.  He couldn’t hack college and never even bothered to try to get an associate’s degree.  I have been exposing him for years (on other forums) and I finally got him to step down this year. 
I have moved on to Michael Dell, another loser, dropped out of college and hit his parents up for a loan to start Dell, Inc.  His head is so swollen because he thinks he knows about computer hardware and laptops.  He thinks this way because he surrounds himself with suckups who enable this type of thinking.  I will expose him soon, just you watch.

I am also working on exposing Richard Wagoner who is the CEO of General Motors Corp.  This guy has been claiming for years to know about the Auto industry, but a background check has revealed he has no degree in this field at all (zero experience).  In fact he doesn’t even Drive!!!!!  He has a personal driver!!  He will be easy to bring down.
 
Remember Socrates and Plato?  Yep, you got it, them too.  Not one day of formal training in the field of philosophy yet they spouted off as if they were experts.  People were so gullible back then. Of course they didn’t have me to point out peoples short comings and expose them. 
People often ask what training I have and you know what I tell them “it is none of your business!!!”, smart huh?.  I don’t ever want to put myself into a position where I can be criticized.  People ask me what qualifications the head of AARC should have, and you know what?  I don’t have to answer that if I don’t feel like it.

Another guy I could have brought down to my level is Sigmond Freud.  This fraud should have been thrown in jail and would have if I was around.  They didn’t have the internet back then to perform background checks but this guy had a doctorate alright but nothing in psychology, go figure.  The loser did his doctorate thesis on “the spinal cord of lower fish species”.  Was this guy wacked out or what?  Then goes on to pretend he knows what people are thinking about their own mother.  Spinless, right?  No pun intended.  Dont get me going again.  I dont think the wiz knows what he is up against.  I dont think anyone should persue a degree or educate themselves unless they are willing to be exposed as losers.

Ha,Ha,Ha, Ajax,  instead of trying to put everyone else’s education on trial, why not specify what requirements you think are needed for the job, what Universities you approve of, maybe indicate what path you choose and why.

For example:

Head of AARC should have as a minimum:

Masters Degree in psychology or related field
3+ years experience working with addiction....etc.

This way we can compare requirements against actual experience.



...

[Anonymous]

Ha,Ha,Ha, Ajax, 

It's not Ajax dumbass.

[TheWho]

It's not Ajax dumbass.

Okay, I fixed the typo.

Let me clear something up, people without the proper education should be exposed.  Look at Bill Gates spouting off like some software expert.  He couldn’t hack college and never even bothered to try to get an associate’s degree.  I have been exposing him for years (on other forums) and I finally got him to step down this year. 
I have moved on to Michael Dell, another loser, dropped out of college and hit his parents up for a loan to start Dell, Inc.  His head is so swollen because he thinks he knows about computer hardware and laptops.  He thinks this way because he surrounds himself with suckups who enable this type of thinking.  I will expose him soon, just you watch.

I am also working on exposing Richard Wagoner who is the CEO of General Motors Corp.  This guy has been claiming for years to know about the Auto industry, but a background check has revealed he has no degree in this field at all (zero experience).  In fact he doesn’t even Drive!!!!!  He has a personal driver!!  He will be easy to bring down.
 
Remember Socrates and Plato?  Yep, you got it, them too.  Not one day of formal training in the field of philosophy yet they spouted off as if they were experts.  People were so gullible back then. Of course they didn’t have me to point out peoples short comings and expose them. 
People often ask what training I have and you know what I tell them “it is none of your business!!!”, smart huh?.  I don’t ever want to put myself into a position where I can be criticized.  People ask me what qualifications the head of AARC should have, and you know what?  I don’t have to answer that if I don’t feel like it.

Another guy I could have brought down to my level is Sigmond Freud.  This fraud should have been thrown in jail and would have if I was around.  They didn’t have the internet back then to perform background checks but this guy had a doctorate alright but nothing in psychology, go figure.  The loser did his doctorate thesis on “the spinal cord of lower fish species”.  Was this guy wacked out or what?  Then goes on to pretend he knows what people are thinking about their own mother.  Spinless, right?  No pun intended.  Dont get me going again.  I dont think the wiz knows what he is up against.  I dont think anyone should persue a degree or educate themselves unless they are willing to be exposed as losers.

Ha,Ha,Ha, Ajaxl3,  instead of trying to put everyone else’s education on trial, why not specify what requirements you think are needed for the job, what Universities you approve of, maybe indicate what path you choose and why.

For example:

Head of AARC should have as a minimum:

Masters Degree in psychology or related field
3+ years experience working with addiction....etc.

This way we can compare requirements against actual experience.



...

[Anonymous]

Maybe some experience running a Nazi concentration camp, or Soviet gulag, or a Chinese Communist detention facility.

[TheWho]

Maybe some experience running a Nazi concentration camp, or Soviet gulag, or a Chinese Communist detention facility.

Not sure I agree with the concentration camps.  But what you said about experience is key.  A person can have all the degrees in the world, but nothing can replace experience.  The undergraduate and graduate degrees lay the foundation for future learning but do not, in and of themselves, create an expert.  This is only acquired thru experience which occurs over time and thru exposure to a particular industry.  Very few people go from classroom to CEO in one step.

It has not become clear to me what requirements ajax13/l3 feels would satisfy heading up AARC .  I sense he is looking for a chemical dependency degree of some type which I am not sure where this is offered.



...

[ajax13]

No.  Teaching phys ed, and then working at Miller Newton's torture camp for a year and half is more than enough experience to head a facility that claims to treat acute cases of chemical dependence.  Thanks Who.

[TheWho]

No.  Teaching phys ed, and then working at Miller Newton's torture camp for a year and half is more than enough experience to head a facility that claims to treat acute cases of chemical dependence.  Thanks Who.

Your welcome, Ajax13, many people overlook the experience piece.  So as I read back thru the threads it seems you are struggling a little with the University where this Vause guy got his PhD, but when it comes to defining qualifications for the job we are looking at some past experience in a facility and graduate work or a teaching background of some type (or better).  I think the strength is within the past experience and graduate work.

This has always been my thinking also so it seems we can agree here on qualifications.  So the doctorate degree doesn’t even come into the picture as far as needed credentials for this position.  This is why it is good to define the requirements first, we can save pages of arguing over the PhD piece when it doesn’t even come into play.



...

[Anonymous]

Your welcome, Ajax13,

This is one of the many reasons nobody can stand you.  You're condescension  and arrogance.   You know damn well that Ajax wrote 'thanks Who' with a sarcastic intent and you respond as if you're actually contributing something to the discussion at hand or anyone respects anything you say.

You slide around, twist words, manipulate, derail threads, change context and pretend that you're part of "us".  You're nothing but a modern day snake oil salesman's PR guy.  Newton and Vause are nothing but con men who have harmed thousands of kids over the years. 

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

[Anonymous]

but when it comes to defining qualifications for the job we are looking at some past experience in a facility and graduate work or a teaching background of some type (or better).  I think the strength is within the past experience and graduate work.

Depends on where they got their past experience.  In this case, Vause got if from Newton and his KIDS programs.   Newton was shut down or run out of every state he tried to set up shop in for abusing kids, refusing to follow even the most fundamental regulations and in general being a complete fraud and abusive liar.  How exactly is Vause's tutelage under Newton valuable to the kids Vause is now verbally vomiting all over? 

[TheWho]

Your welcome, Ajax13,

This is one of the many reasons nobody can stand you.  You're condescension  and arrogance.   You know damn well that Ajax wrote 'thanks Who' with a sarcastic intent and you respond as if you're actually contributing something to the discussion at hand or anyone respects anything you say.

You slide around, twist words, manipulate, derail threads, change context and pretend that you're part of "us".  You're nothing but a modern day snake oil salesman's PR guy.  Newton and Vause are nothing but con men who have harmed thousands of kids over the years. 

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

Sarcasm or not, I think we were able to separate out requirements from personal opinions which was an important step in this discussion.  If you are merely here to make friends then good luck to you, and it appears you are the one trying to derail this thread not I.

You are so blinded by your own hatred that you missed the double standard playing out here.  We have ajax13 openly diagnosing people with mental illnesses on line with no apparent credentials to speak of and at the same time telling others that their education is lacking.

You claim I am trying to be part of you?  You haven’t even told me who you are or logged in, how could I be.  Anyone who has been here long enough knows I speak for myself and am not trying to join your group, as you call it.  You hide in the shadows and take pot shots at people and pretend to be brave, it seems you are the one behind the curtain.



...