Author Topic: Read it and Weep!  (Read 7157 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« on: July 15, 2003, 08:23:00 PM »
Home
Eastside
So. County
Business
Boeing News
Prep Sports
Sports
Opinion
Obituaries
Paid
Obituaries
Milestones
Living
Entertain.
Women's Journal
Site Map
Search Archive

World News
MoneyWire

Mytown
Classifieds

Traffic
Weather
Lotto
Crossword
Dilbert
Horoscope
Movies
Komo TV
TV Listings

Home Delivery
Advertising
Jobs with Us
About Us
Contact Us
 



 
 




 

   
 
 
 
Facing no other options - Parents send their unruly children out of country to specialty boarding schools
2003-07-14
by Lori Varosh
Journal Reporter

It was an excruciating decision to send their son 1,200 miles from home for an undetermined length of time to a walled center in Mexico that specializes in behavior modification.

But Virginia and Dexter Day of Redmond believed they had no other option.

They had already sent Gabe to counselors and psychiatrists. They had pressed charges when he took their car at age 13. They had tried anger-management classes, specialized drugs and the advice of a tough-love type of organization, all to no avail.

Then Redmond police called one May night in 2002, saying they'd found Gabe, then 14, clammy and blue, slumped outside a Redmond apartment building, likely overdosed on marijuana laced with embalming fluid.

``We knew we had to intervene in a more direct manner,'' Virginia Day said. ``You know you have to do something big to save your child's life.''

Parents they knew had sent their kids to the ``specialty boarding school'' called Casa by the Sea in Baja California, Mexico, and had been ecstatic with the results.

The Days researched its umbrella organization, World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools, and decided to give the place a try.

Such schools for troubled kids have come under fire recently for extreme tactics -- kidnapping kids, using handcuffs and solitary confinement, for instance. But to numerous Eastside families, they've been a godsend, Day said.

``It's hard for people who haven't experienced a meltdown in their own family to appreciate the special needs these kids have,'' she said. ``Most kids end up thanking their parents for giving them an opportunity to have a life.''

Parents are forced to look to out-of-state or Central American schools, in part because it's illegal in Washington to restrain a child who is not accused of a crime.

Even if they're being sentenced for a crime, ``you can give them credit for inpatient treatment, but you can't order it,'' said Patricia Clark, presiding judge of King County Juvenile Court.

Washington parents, she said, are prohibited by statute from forcing children over the age of 12 into any kind of treatment program without their consent.

The law ``is very different from other states, and causes a whole raft of concerns and issues,'' Clark said. ``The issue is: How does a mentally-ill child or a substance-addicted child gain the necessary skills to make a decision about whether they need treatment?''

Without out-of-state schools, kids would get no help at all, said Day, who knows of a half dozen Eastside families in the Changes Parent Support Network, to which she belongs, who have sent kids to such behavioral-modification schools in recent years.

Attitude and behavior problems

Richard Browder of Bellevue is one.

His daughter had been a chronic runaway with attitude and behavior problems when he sent her to Casa by the Sea two years ago. She was 15.

At first, she complained about the food and bugs. She tried to lay a guilt trip on her parents, especially for leaving her there on her 16th birthday.

By the time she returned home 18 months later, however, she had changed, Browder said.

``We got my daughter back.''

She grew to love the Mexican Indian woman who worked in the laundry. She taught the woman English and learned Spanish in return. She learned to be of service, he said.

When she returned home, she felt lonely for a while, separated from her old drug-using crowd. But she told Browder, ``I have my values. When people come along with similar values, I'll have new friends.''

Not a week later, Browder said, she did.

Today, six months after her return, she's very focused, Browder said. She earned a nearly 3.5 grade-point average in her last high school term. She lettered in track. She got a job. She regularly attends church, and volunteers once a month to feed the homeless.

``She really has some life skills now,'' he said. ``That's the thrust of the program. It teaches them to believe in themselves.

``It's the best thing we ever did,'' said Browder, who asked his daughter if she wanted to be interviewed for this story. She declined.

`Probably die in the streets'

A criminal psychologist advised Aidan and Bernadette Maher of Kirkland to do something fast, or their son ``would probably die in the streets.''

Stealing cars had gotten him into the criminal justice system. His parents had put him in drug rehab and he'd run away. He ran away from home constantly, 13 times in as many months, Aidan Maher said.

``We realized, he's not running away from home, he's running away to do what he wanted, in other words, abuse drugs,'' Maher said. ``He was a very surly, noncommunicative, hostile young man.''

The Mahers sent him to Casa by the Sea because he was always good at languages, because living in a foreign country could deter his running and because, with lower land values and salaries, the cost is considerably lower than in the States.

Similar programs legal in states like Iowa, Utah and California can cost $4,000 a month. Because of lower land and labor costs, overseas schools are less expensive -- about $2,500 a month at Casa.

A teen escort service took him in handcuffs from the Juvenile Detention Center in Seattle to San Diego, and from there to Mexico. After a rocky start, he went on to an even stricter program at Tranquility Bay in Jamaica.

It was a full year before the Mahers saw him again.

``The boy we met three weeks ago was a completely different person,'' Maher said in late June, his voice thickening. ``He had completely turned around.''

Now 17, their son seems to have become ``a very positive young man, very at ease with himself,'' Maher said. He took personal responsibility, seemed to understand his parents' insistence that he stay in the program longer and was very loving.

``Emotionally, it was just great. We were thrilled.''

Maher didn't want his son's name used so that his former friends -- all drug users -- won't be able to keep track of him.

`Values, integrity, honor'

The Utah-based World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools encompasses eight independently owned schools for troubled youth in four states and three foreign countries, though the government recently closed one in Costa Rica.

According to the company's Web site, at http://www.wwasp.com/, the schools ``teach values, integrity, honor, and respect for authority. They are specifically designed to help teens replace inappropriate attitudes, behaviors and habits with new, productive ones.''

Maher, Browder and Day all emphasized that a key component of the WWASPS program is its parallel seminars for parents.

``This program is the only one focused on the whole family,'' Browder said.

``The idea is, they come home to a different home,'' Maher said, ``so you don't repeat patterns.''

After having broken his back, undergone a heart transplant and lost his business, Browder said, he was ``not a very happy person,'' he said. ``I had a lot of crap going on.

``I was short-tempered,'' he said, and it affected his daughter's behavior. ``People need to take a good hard look at themselves. Actions produce results you don't like.''

Though for a time, he was skeptical, Browder came to appreciate the behavior-modification program.

``It didn't just change my daughter, it changed my wife and me,'' Browder said.

``Our family used to be dysfunctional. Now we have fun.''

Installing discipline

At Casa by the Sea, the rules are strict, parents say.

Kids are allowed no condiments for their food, for instance, until they pass level 1. Tennis shoes are not permitted until they achieve the highest level, level 4. (It's hard to run wearing flip-flops on dirt, Browder explained.)

The whole point, Browder said, is to instill discipline. ``Most kids desire to have boundaries and rules.'' They begin to appreciate the freedom they had at home.

``They really earn all that; they earn self-respect.''

Although it takes an average of 18 to 24 months to complete the course, some take as few as 14 or as many as 32 months to graduate. Some never do.

``It's definitely not for everybody,'' Browder said.

There are collateral benefits, however. Browder knows of one boy at Casa whose two buddies were also methamphetamine users. They quit meth and got their grades up, he said, ``because they knew they'd be next'' to be sent away to school.

Marijuana in sixth grade

Long after the fact, the Days learned Gabe had been introduced to marijuana by grade six. By junior high, he'd graduated to methamphetamines.

He also had Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, a common diagnosis for children who later get into trouble, Day said.

``They already tend to be impulsive and predisposed to problems in school,'' she said. ``They have problems socially because they're behind in social development. And they're at risk for self-medicating.''

Gable began to have problems respecting the rules at home. He'd be absent all weekend, partying. He wasn't doing well in school and he finally quit going.

Then he overdosed.

Though Gabe did not resist when 16 people from the Changes Parent Support Network, a Redmond-based group to which the Days belong, brought two vans to accompany him to the airport, many kids do.

``Typically, kids are angry. They don't go willingly, because they're out of control,'' Day said. ``The party's over.''

When he arrived at Casa by the Sea last July, Gabe chose telling words to describe his self-image: ``skateboarder, clown, pothead,'' Day learned later.

In the nearly 12 months since, Day said, he has come to consider himself a ``clean, strong, intelligent young man.''

In weekly letters and once-a-month phone calls home, he was encouraged to pose uncomfortable questions about family dynamics.

It was, in turn, encouraging for the Days ``to get a proactive letter from a kid who for years did not let us into his thinking process.

``I'm really, really proud because he's working now,'' Day said.

Gabe is still in Mexico, and unavailable for an interview.

The Days and other local families represent the tip of the iceberg, Day believes.

``There is so much pain out there, it is phenomenal,'' with kids involved in eating disorders, self-mutilation, drugs, she said.

``The kids know something is not right. For some, it's a relief when they see their parents have finally done something.''

Lori Varosh can be reached at http://www.kingcountyjournal.com/sited/ ... tml/137370
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline SilmarilOne

  • Posts: 33
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2003, 08:45:00 PM »
I did, and I am.  It is truly something to weep about.  When this type of child abuse is outlawed in Mexico and Costa Rica, why not send them to North Korea or perhaps Syria?  I'm sure they would be more than willing to whip them in to shape there too, where the ends justify any and all means, including kidnapping and torture.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
o trees have been harmed in the sending of this message.  However, several thousand electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

Offline turbinekat

  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2003, 08:55:00 PM »
Ooooohhhhh!!!  Should we be happy or sad?  Happy for a visions project that finally succeeded OR sad that YOUR child is still in lock down.  Also, why do you post anon. scared OR not proud of yourself?

After, the Dundee fiasco, I don't think I would be bragging about to much these days.  It's just the calm before the storm for wwasps.  I believe the name of the song is "Time is on my side"?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2003, 02:35:00 AM »
That article was all about money. Those parents who had their words published will receive a check, and WWASP will receive new enrollment adding to the millions in profits each year. One sick ring for profit, at the cost of our youth.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline spots

  • Posts: 251
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2003, 12:29:00 PM »
This newspaper is not exactly small-time, but not huge either.  Circulation, they say, reaches 50K homes.  There is an active parents' group in the Seattle area, and they obviously know how to generate publicity.  Do you suppose the reporter called and asked for information ???? or did she receive a call from these "ecstatic" parents wanting to share their good fortune in finding WWASPS?

In any event, since a lot of Seattle-area folks could be exposed, why not write a Letter to the Editor, explaining what this fluffy story did not.  The contact is peter.horvitz@kingcountyjournal.com, and the News Editor is Craig Groshart.  Fight Back!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2003, 01:10:00 PM »
``The boy we met three weeks ago was a completely different person,'' Maher said in late June, his voice thickening. ``He had completely turned around.''

This, I believe. Got money? Don't like your kid? No problem! Just ship them off to be broken, brainwashed and reprogramed!

Stepford has arrived!

A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another; shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement
http://laissezfairebooks.com/product.cfm?op=view&pid=FF7485&aid=10247' target='_new'>Thomas Jefferson

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2003, 04:16:00 PM »
Quote
On 2003-07-16 10:10:00, Antigen wrote:

Don't like your kid? No problem! Just ship them off to be broken, brainwashed and reprogramed!




That's a weird statement??  Parents may not like what their kid is doing to self destruct, but if they didn't like their kid, they certainly wouldn't spend a dime on them, much less do the inner work to change the dynamics to be a successful family.  Whatever your story is, it's unfortunate you can't see past your own pain to actually help instead of attack help that is available - I have yet to see Resources as this site is identified.  What "help" do you recommend for families in crisis?  It seems to me that WWASP programs actually help with parenting and family unity - and it's obvious it hasn't worked for everyone - but you gotta want it.  Were you in a WWASP school or do you just dislike help in general?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #7 on: July 16, 2003, 04:37:00 PM »
>>Were you in a WWASP school or do you just dislike help in general?

Some of us define "help" very differently. We are entitled to the opinion that Behavior Modification, Abuse, Neglect are not desirable methods of "helping".
 
I resent your message which seems to imply that YOUR definition of "help" is the only one and others who disagree must be weird or wrong.
I do not define any program as "help". And yes there are many other options available to parents and teens. Some people choose to think outside the box and take full responsibility.

The issue I have with you program parents is your lack of respect for other's RIGHTS. The right to have a different opinion and speak it. The right to share one's experience as it is perceived. Why do you choose to hang around here saying the same thing over and over. Find some tolerance.. it just might improve your relationship with your teen. The rest of the world does not have to be inline with your choices and decisions. Grow up.
Deborah
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #8 on: July 16, 2003, 06:08:00 PM »
I am a mom looking for resources.  So if wwasp program parents are different from what I'm reading on this forum, my choice is to be like them.  It doesn't look like there's abuse or neglect involved with this option.  Just some allegations that are on other threads.  It also doesn't look like it will go anywhere.  On the contrary, since they are under close watch, there would be NOTHING that could be construed as abuse anyway. If it wasn't the safest program before, it is now!  Thanks for all your help.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline SilmarilOne

  • Posts: 33
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #9 on: July 16, 2003, 06:35:00 PM »
Boy, THAT was circular logic if I ever heard it!  Try to convince yourself all you want, but if you put your kid in one of those places you are guilty of child abuse.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
o trees have been harmed in the sending of this message.  However, several thousand electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

Offline spots

  • Posts: 251
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #10 on: July 16, 2003, 06:45:00 PM »
quote:
"... On the contrary, since they are under close watch, there would be NOTHING that could be construed as abuse anyway."

Statements such as the above by Anon illustrate why protecting children from WWASP-like programs cannot be left unregulated.  This parent reads the literally-hundreds of "case history" comments by survivors on boards like this, and her reponse is, "if SOMEONE is watching the little buggers all the time, then nothing abusive can be going on."  Such totally illogical reasoning and 100% reliance on somebody else to fix the problem she can't handle tells me that government (i.e., laws) are going to have to go in and protect this woman's child, because she certainly isn't interested in doing it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #11 on: July 16, 2003, 06:56:00 PM »
If you are really looking for help for your child, you should want help that is supported by scientific research, not help which has as its only support personal anecdotes.  Would you choose treatment for cancer based only on accounts of people who said that particular treatment was a success, and ignoring those who said it had harmed and ignoring the medical research?

I didn't think so.  So why do you see behavioral treatment for teenagers as subject to a lesser standard of proof?

If you really want help for your teenager, why aren't you seeing a medical professional?   Why are you going to people who say explicitly in their contract that what they do isn't "therapeutic"? Why would you sign your child over to people who say that they will err on the side of avoiding medical expenses, rather than on the side of caution and who expect you to hold them blameless legally if they make a mistake there that harms or even kills your child?  Have you actually read what the WWASP contract permits them to do to your kid?

Also, why aren't you starting with the least intrusive option first-- as medical professionals recommend?  Why aren't you looking at the medical research?

The research on behavioral treatment for teens finds that confrontational, boot camp style approaches are harmful and counterproductive.  When they are compared to empathetic therapies, the empathetic therapists have far better outcomes-- less relapse to drug use, for example.  Also, programs like WWASP put teens with minor problems in with those with serious problems-- and research finds that when you do that, you tend to get more kids getting worse than getting better.

If you care about your child, you should hold treatment for their behavioral problems to the same standard that you would hold treatment for their other medical problems.  WWASP, by all accounts from people with real expertise in treating troubled kids effectively, fails in this.

Sure, you can find some quack psychologists to praise it-- but you can also find some of them who still believe in rebirthing, which killed a child a few years ago.  You will be hard-pressed to find a legitimate psychologist or psychiatrist who had read the research literature to support WWASP.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline scottT

  • Posts: 55
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #12 on: July 16, 2003, 07:05:00 PM »
dear anonymous mom:

if you think its safe,  i urge you to read your WWASP contract more closely (and take it to your lawyer if you dont understand all of the implications).  If WWASPs wants you to believe that they are "safer than ever before"  why do they try to disclaim all liability in their contract?  Why would they insist that they are only subject to the law of Mexico (or whereever)

As I've said in this space before, would you let your daughter go driving around with a kid who had no car insurance and had their driver's license suspended 4 times?  By your logic, the kid with no license and no insurance must must be a really safe driver now,  since he'll get in a lot more trouble if he's caught again! Well, uh, no....

This analogy is directly on point.  WWASP's contract purports to eliminate the need for any "insurance" since (they want you to believe) that you cant sue them anyway. (Or not that you'd want to,  cause they've never, ever done anything wrong...)  And they've lost operations in Samoa, Mexico, Czech Republic,  and at the moment, have been found in non-compliance by regulators in SOuth Carolina.

Have a nice time, kids!  Remember that seat belts and airbags aren't the only kind of passive restraints!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
am an angry, wrathful man,  put here to step on the toes of those who dance around the truth (ex WWASPers may acknowledge the sarcasm)

Offline FaceKhan

  • Posts: 395
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #13 on: July 16, 2003, 07:17:00 PM »
The LA times articles are much more uplifting. I find it amazing that a reporter does not see a problem when the only kids that can claim a positive experience are still living with their parents and are under threat of being sent back and the parents who so think the program changed their kid's lives, most cases the kid has not even been home yet.

Since a lot of these parents are rich or at least upper middle class to send their kids to such high priced prison complexes I think they just don't understand the basic dynamic of institutionalization and kids.


Parents are guilty of child abuse if they leave their kid in the care of anyone or any group that they have reason to believe is abusive or may be abusive. It is called due dilligence. They are also guilty if they do not research a program before sending their kid to be abused.

Mexican law, hmmm I can't wait for them to piss off one of the more passionate parents who gets their kid back all programmed and doesn't like it. Mexican law usually involves some money changing hands and a hole in the desert.    

Kids are abused almost across the board in any institutional setting. The system is so broken both in private and public settings that it is difficult to find a place where the kids are not being abused. You only have to look at the private contractor facilities that are hired by major cities for the kids in state custody. A contractor in DC is embroiled in a scandal where they essentially took the city's money and left the kids to fend for themselves in these apartment buildings. At least 3 of the kids were murdered while in the program's care and another one is charged with a murder. w

[ This Message was edited by: FaceKhan on 2003-07-16 16:27 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
All of the darkness of the world cannot put out the light of one small candle.\"

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Read it and Weep!
« Reply #14 on: July 16, 2003, 07:23:00 PM »
By effective treatment, what do you mean?  We've been to a psychologist, psychiatrists, parent's anonymous, drug rehab (joke) and the best they could do (the pyschiatrist and the school counselor) was to suggest medication for ADHD.  Sorry,but that's NOT an option and one that I consider abuse and neglect. Instead of fearing what I read here, I am convinced that regulation would only provide more of what we DON'T need. I'll check back with you soon. There's no cure for ADHD, but the results of behavior modification (anger management, inner work) have a better change of being successful than medication the rest of one's life.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »