« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7   Go Down

Author Topic: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)  (Read 11879 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anne Bonney

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5006
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #75 on: January 24, 2008, 02:09:03 PM »
last word.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
traight, St. Pete, early 80s
AA is a cult http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-cult.html

The more boring a child is, the more the parents, when showing off the child, receive adulation for being good parents-- because they have a tame child-creature in their house.  ~~  Frank Zappa

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #76 on: January 24, 2008, 02:17:15 PM »
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
last word.

Okay, You can have it!!  Go for it
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #77 on: January 24, 2008, 02:18:51 PM »
Quote from: "TheWho"
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
last word.

Okay, You can have it!!  Go for it

Paradoxically, you didn't let her have it... now I have the last word... if you say "I can have it" then.. well.. you have the last word.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #78 on: January 24, 2008, 02:35:58 PM »
You all were made for each other.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anne Bonney

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5006
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #79 on: January 24, 2008, 02:40:15 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
You all were made for each other.


'Splain please.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
traight, St. Pete, early 80s
AA is a cult http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-cult.html

The more boring a child is, the more the parents, when showing off the child, receive adulation for being good parents-- because they have a tame child-creature in their house.  ~~  Frank Zappa

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #80 on: January 24, 2008, 02:45:41 PM »
I guess you have a point, but if I place my dialog up top like this and then leave your reply at the bottom then from a purely structural point of view your words are last.

Quote from: "psy"
Quote from: "TheWho"
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
last word.

Okay, You can have it!!  Go for it

Paradoxically, you didn't let her have it... now I have the last word... if you say "I can have it" then.. well.. you have the last word.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline The Monsters

  • Posts: 96
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #81 on: January 24, 2008, 04:18:43 PM »
To the Jackass guest. goody two shoes? you must be joking.


Juts because we CAN be rotten pieces of shit and treat everyone like dog spit in a modly brown bag does not mean we should. It's called common politeness.

Yes we are by no means fond of The Who but to make cracks at people who have nothing to do with the arguemtn it petty busllshit and in it's own way EXACTLY what PV and RTC staff do. Insult people who did nothing wrong and point out there flaws.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #82 on: January 24, 2008, 04:36:10 PM »
Quote from: "The Monsters"
To the Jackass guest. goody two shoes? you must be joking.


Juts because we CAN be rotten pieces of shit and treat everyone like dog spit in a modly brown bag does not mean we should. It's called common politeness.

Yes we are by no means fond of The Who but to make cracks at people who have nothing to do with the arguemtn it petty busllshit and in it's own way EXACTLY what PV and RTC staff do. Insult people who did nothing wrong and point out there flaws.

well...you obviously dont have much of a sense of humor, nor any ability to take a hint. i have a feeling youre fat and ugly too and thats why you're so sentimental about this.
why do you think i called myself a jackass? what do you think i was trying to imply?

maybe it has something to do with using irony to point out where this board is going (down a very steep hill, that is).

regardless, i dont give a fuck about political correctness, as long as it doesnt scare away parents. as parents are not really browsing this board because of the existing porn, spam, and the nigger lynching post, it really makes no difference as of right now.

i think the time has come for this board to phase out absolute annon free speech. it seems counterproductive to the purpose of the board.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline The Monsters

  • Posts: 96
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #83 on: January 24, 2008, 04:50:01 PM »
it's not about political correctness. We dont care about that at all in fact we made comments the who said we should be careful about. PC is not an issue. It's simply rude to bring someone else who has done nothing wrong in this situation up for ridicule just because the person they are POSSIBLY connected to is a douchebag.

Yes you can say whatever you want... just don't expect people not to respond because we TOO have the power to voice what we think.

Second rate insults like "your fat and ugly" don't hurt us. We don't take anything offensive anymore... that does not mean we don't know what IS rude. Just because your dad raped you and deprived you of any social skills does not mean we have to pretend we don't either.

See? we can be cruel too because people like you usualy ARE the kinds of kids that were sexualy abused and thus frustrated that mommy never said anything... That or you are just a WoW Nerd who finds pathetic pleasure in making others feel worse because your only existence is based off a computer generated world.

But no matter

you are free to think and say as you choose... just dont expect everyone to put their thumbs up their asses and let you say it with out even calling you out on it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #84 on: January 28, 2008, 05:55:16 PM »
Quote from: "Froderik"
So The Monsters refer "themselves" as "we." So fucking what? I was in a program too and am all too familiar with the evils of groupthink, but I don't let the "we" stuff bother me. I suggest you stop letting it bother you. Either The Monsters really are more than one, or it's just a gimmick. Either way, it's certainly nothing to get so freaked out by. Learn to differentiate a little.


Thanks, I “differentiate” ok. I don’t freak when someone says, “manipulate” or “trust,” but an individual presenting herself as a collective unconscious disturbs me. Period.

I’m not the only one disturbed, either. How long you been out? How long “in”? I’m not out long, and was “in” long, so perhaps I’m more sensitive. No one has to change anything for me, but it would be nice not to use cult-trauma specific “triggers” in a forum for torture-cult survivors.

Likewise, going to a rape survivor forum with an avatar or a girl being raped, and including the words “I’m going to rape you” in every verbal exchange is not nice too.

One of my cults couched every exchange in the plural “we” as in, “’we’ feel you are being dishonest,” so it gets to me, especially.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #85 on: January 29, 2008, 10:55:25 AM »
Well, ok then.. fair enough. I've been out a long while. I didn't know about the "we" thing in your program, which one was that? (The groupthink at Straight was more implicit, not so blatant as to use the word "we" like that all of the time.) My apologies for harshing on you about it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline ZenAgent

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1720
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.freepowerboards.com/strugglingppl/index.php
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #86 on: January 29, 2008, 11:08:35 AM »
Quote from: "Froderik"
Well, ok then.. fair enough. I've been out a long while. I didn't know about the "we" thing in your program, which one was that? (The groupthink at Straight was more implicit, not so blatant as to use the word "we" like that all of the time.) My apologies for harshing on you about it.

It sounds like AA cult-ness, which is different from what the monsters intend...TheWho does the same thing, with his royal we-ness, but he's just using programee shit.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
\"Allah does not love the public utterance of hurtful speech, unless it be by one to whom injustice has been done; and Allah is Hearing, Knowing\" - The Qur\'an

_______________________________________________
A PV counselor\'s description of his job:

\"I\'m there to handle kids that are psychotic, suicidal, homicidal, or have commited felonies. Oh yeah, I am also there to take them down when they are rowdy so the nurse can give them the booty juice.\"

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #87 on: January 29, 2008, 11:14:27 AM »
Has anyone here ever read that Ayn Rand novel called Anthem? It was written like that: using we instead of I. She obviously wrote it that way to make a point. Ironically, this was a book I read while I was in 'the program.'
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline DieYuppieSkum

  • Posts: 77
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #88 on: January 29, 2008, 11:48:54 AM »
dude, I read her book too.

In PV no less.

ka ZING.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: $400 Bounty for TheWho's Identity (pot raised again)
« Reply #89 on: January 29, 2008, 12:21:09 PM »
I think the poster "noone" would have a point if the use of the word “we” was used universally (within the program community) as an abusive term and was generally pervasive throughout abusive programs and or cults.  If this is true then I would feel “The monsters” use of the “we” as a collective would be insensitive to many people here.  This is for those who have attended programs to decide…. this may also prove to be a good topic for a poll to see how many programs use this approach  and if it bothers those who have graduated from (or attended) those programs.  The results may prove the sensitivity of its use here on fornits.

But speaking for myself, I use the word “we” to mean “The people on fornits” (at times).  Other times it is meant to represent only those who agree (or potentially agree) with me on a specific topic (program parents for example).


…
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7   Go Up
« previous next »