Author Topic: Showdown over shock therapy  (Read 3054 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #15 on: January 20, 2008, 10:38:22 AM »
Okey dokey.  Next YLF stop should be JRC.  Anybody disagree here?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #16 on: January 20, 2008, 10:51:39 AM »
Quote from: "Don't Taz Me Bro"
The Behavior Research Institute (BRI) was forced to shut down and move elsewhere following the 1990 torture and murder of Linda Cornelison.

"aversives"...  Why not just call a spade a spade and say "hey.. we abuse, torture, and/or otherwise instill terror into your kid until he learns 'good' behavior".  This shit is not far short of what somebody lke Josef Mengele would do in the name of science.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #17 on: January 20, 2008, 10:57:02 AM »
Quote from: "pickles3"
I want to choke a few of those so called advocates. HOW about we stop shocking those kids all together?



How about we start shocking the politicians*.  Hey.  If it's not painful at all, why not let the general public have a little taste of what these "aversives" entail. I'll volunteer.  But I'd really have to insist on choosing one randomly off an actual kid.  I'm not entirely confident they don't up the juice for internal use.

*Just kidding (i have to say that)...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #18 on: January 20, 2008, 08:35:20 PM »
They really do eat up your bullshit here with a smile, Psy. Maybe if they knew what you were saying on YIM they might think twice about giving you admin status. If they knew what you were really doing with their IP's, perhaps? That's right, if you don't cut it out, I will post all our conversations and let everyone know what is really going on behind the scenes. From this point on, it's all up to you. They probably still think the forum switch was all about an "upgrade"? Baa Baa Baa go the sheep, right, Psy?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #19 on: January 20, 2008, 09:21:33 PM »
Fuck off, pussy. Get some balls and login if you want a shred of respect while cutting someone like psy down.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #20 on: January 20, 2008, 09:29:52 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
They really do eat up your bullshit here with a smile, Psy. Maybe if they knew what you were saying on YIM they might think twice about giving you admin status. If they knew what you were really doing with their IP's, perhaps? That's right, if you don't cut it out, I will post all our conversations and let everyone know what is really going on behind the scenes. From this point on, it's all up to you. They probably still think the forum switch was all about an "upgrade"? Baa Baa Baa go the sheep, right, Psy?

Sure.. post the conversions.  Please do. Your move.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Che Gookin

  • Global Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
  • Karma: +11/-3
    • View Profile
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #21 on: January 20, 2008, 09:38:33 PM »
Can we prune out threats against Psy and put them in their own thread?


And yes.. lets zap some pols! George Miller goes first.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #22 on: January 24, 2008, 11:04:16 AM »
Moving right along, back to the topic at hand... I do believe this is a more local version (with more details) about the same family noted in the recent Boston Globe article Parent details toll taken by shocks at group home. That latter piece was written mostly from the perspective of the father. Apparently, the mother is not so gung-ho, hesitantly describing it here as "medieval to me."



Jan 22, 2008
Former Silver Lake student shocked 77 times in prank at Judge Rotenberg Center
By Tom Benner, Gatehouse news service

BOSTON• The divorced parents of a special education student victimized in an electric skin shock prank at the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center say the punishing therapy shouldn't be banned outright.

"A lot of people think it is some kind of crazy electrocution," said Charles Dumas of Halifax, whose son formerly attended Silver Lake regional schools.

The son, now 19, was given 77 painful skin shocks over a three-hour period in the early morning hours on Aug. 26.

Dumas' son was one of two students at the center who were wrongfully shocked in a harrowing night that is detailed in a new state report released today.

The report concludes the Halifax teen was severely physically and emotionally abused by the wrongful treatments.

The other student, age 16, received 29 shocks.

"My son has been in and out of a lot of places and so highly medicated that he would drool," Dumas said. "He was behaving better than he ever had at JRC. He's made huge leaps and bounds since he's been there."

The teenager's mother, Dawn Dumas of Taunton, also said in a separate interview that her emotionally troubled son seemed to improve at the JRC.

"It's medieval to me," Dawn Dumas said of skin-shock therapy, "but I guess it helps."

Today's report by the state Disabled Persons Protection Commission says the couple's son was placed at the school in March 2006, with the Silver Lake Regional School District and the state Department of Social Services paying for his tuition at the Rotenberg center, which costs about $210,000 per student annually.

The report says the teen, who name is not being released because he was a victim, had problem behaviors, including "aggressive, health dangerous, destructive, impulsive, noncompliant, and sexually inappropriate behaviors."

The report says the teen had been "totally happy" at the Rotenberg center until the Aug. 26 incident, saying he had seldom been subject to electric shocks and that he had "changed dramatically."

The report says the teen suspected the phone calls ordering that he be punished were a prank and told group home staffers as they administered skin shocks, "when have you ever known someone to call and give GEDs (graduated electronic decelerator, or skin shocks) over the phone?"

Charles Dumas declined further comment because his son still lives at the Rotenberg center. The second victim in the case, who was from Virginia, has since left the school.

DPPC investigators identify the prank caller as Stephen Ferrer-Torres, a former student who had "eloped," or run away, before making the prank calls as an apparent retaliation. His whereabouts are unknown by investigators conducting a criminal investigation.

A former Rotenberg center employee who worked with Ferrer-Torres doesn't believe skin-shock therapy helped him.

"He's done something bad, but he's not a bad kid," said Greg Miller of Newtonville, who now works at a school for autistic children.

Miller, who worked at the Rotenberg center for three years before leaving in 2006, said he sometimes couldn't administer skin shocks.

A spokesman for the school did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

Skin shocks and other so-called "aversive" therapies are needed to treat many of the school's more than 200 autistic, retarded or emotionally disturbed students, school officials maintain.

Critics maintain the two-second skin shocks are physically abusive and are pushing state lawmakers to restrict or ban the treatments.

The Aug. 26 incident at one of the school's group homes in Stoughton was caught on tape by camera monitors.

The Rotenberg center officials destroyed copies of the tape despite an order by state investigators to preserve copies.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #23 on: January 24, 2008, 06:25:20 PM »
I've found someone with personal accounts of being a former student at the JRC. Read his blog here:
http://www.xanga.com/jrc_blogger
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #24 on: January 29, 2008, 07:39:48 AM »
the Justice
THE INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF BRAINDEIS UNIVERSITY
Robinson '11 testifies in Rotenberg hearing
by Sarah Bayer

News | 1/29/08
Posted online at 3:16 AM EST on 1/29/08

Seven members of Brandeis Students Against the Judge Rotenberg Center attended a Jan. 16 hearing of the Massachusetts legislature's Joint Committee on Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities, which is considering six bills intended to scale back or eliminate the practices of the Judge Rotenberg Center, a school for children with special needs located in Canton, Mass.

The hearings were about aversive shock therapy's safety and effectiveness in treating behavioral disorders. House Bill H109 bans the use of aversive shock in the commonwealth of Massachusetts; another bill limits it to severe cases, and the students said the other four bills add technical details to the original two.

Nathan J. Robinson '11 testified before the committee on behalf of the campus group, which is seeking to stop the use of aversive shock therapy at the center largely through measures such as letter-writing campaigns, calling state legislators and posting on political blogs. The students also presented a petition signed by 644 Brandeis students calling for JRC's closure.

Robinson presented the petition and discussed how BSAJRC got started. He testified about the group's moral objections to aversive shock, including the fact that there are no scientific or legal assertions in support of shock therapy.

Robinson described his experience testifying as "very, very intimidating" because it was preceded by hours of listening to "depressing and moving" testimony by parents of JRC students favorable to the center.

In response to JRC founder Dr. Matthew Israel's testimony discussing measures taken to prevent mistaken shocks, club member Liza Behrendt '11 said she was surprised at "how unknowledgeable he was about his own institution." Lev Hirschhorn '11 said the hearings helped him realize "the sorry state of the medical system in America" that treats those with disabilities as criminals.

Robinson expressed emotional apprehension over the issue, and said that a parent approached him after the hearing and told him, "You're young, and you don't understand."

JRC representative Ernie Corrigan sees the club's existence as "a clear sign that people don't understand what happens at JRC." However, Robinson and the other members maintain their conviction that "the disabled do have basic rights," which the JRC has violated.

According to Hirschhorn, BSAJRC advocates a "complex way of dealing" with behaviorally challenged individuals including limited use of drugs, positive reinforcement techniques such as "modeling", as opposed to the JRC's system of punishments and rewards. "Every kid is the wrong kid to be shocked," Hirschhorn says. Corrigan said, however, that, "if they're not getting help there, then they're not getting help."

Although Dr. Israel invited club members to the JRC, plans to visit were put on hold last semester when a representative asked that the club instead host a group of JRC parents.

Corrigan said the invitation for JRC parents to come to Brandeis was revoked because the club's "sole mission is opposition to JRC" and JRC administrators did not feel they had made a genuine attempt at "fact-finding and trying to understand what aversive therapy is about."

In September, Robinson told the Justice that "we've read news articles, consulted Web sites and heard many different perspectives about the use of aversive therapy. We really feel that we have all the facts." Hirschhorn said club leaders are still hoping to arrange a visit to the JRC this semester.

BSAJRC has communicated with students at other colleges and is one of about 20 other disabled rights organizations that oppose aversive shock therapy. The club intends to expand its grassroots efforts this semester. According to Hirschhorn, members have been in communication with former JRC employees who oppose the Center and a former student. These contacts, however, will not come to speak at Brandeis because they wish to remain anonymous.

The club faces an uncertain future if legislation regulating the JRC passes, but according to Robinson, it may expand its mission to "campaign for better mental health services" in general.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #25 on: February 08, 2008, 08:39:31 PM »
Another student article, different institution...



THE COMMENT
BRIDGEWATER STATE COLLEGE'S STUDENT RUN NEWSPAPER SINCE 1927
Judging the Judge: An Examination of the Judge Rotenberg Center
Michelle Lyons
Issue date:
2/7/08 Section: Opinion


The number of children admitted to residential treatment facilities continues to rise. How does a parent decide which institution is the best fit for their child? Which facility will nurture their child and elicit true progress? There's no formula here, you have to take a chance, and place your faith in complete strangers. I wish I could tell you every program is equally helpful and attentive. I wish I could tell you children are always respected while in their care. For the large part, I think most people believe this, I know I did.

One day, I was looking for a job at such a facility. I wanted to work with children, and as a psychology major and an aspiring therapist it seemed like a dream job. I scoured the papers and came across an ad for the Judge Rotenberg Center. They were offering a large sign on bonus and no experience was necessary. It sounded too good to be true. They listed a website, so I figured I'd go explore. What I found gave me goose bumps and made my stomach turn.

When you visit their website, http://www.judgerc.org/, you are greeted with a colorful homepage, their logo a sun rising behind a rainbow. They seem inviting and caring. They think they are. They describe themselves as a "special needs school in Canton, Massachusetts serving both high-functioning students with conduct, behavior, emotional, and/or psychiatric problems and low-functioning students with autistic-like behaviors. Some of our key features include consistent behavioral treatment; minimal or no psychotropic medication; near-zero rejections/near-zero expulsions; powerful, varied rewards; one computer per student; behavior charts online; digital video monitoring; and beautiful school and residences." They still sound pretty normal. The disturbing aspect comes when you explore what exactly their consistent behavioral treatment entails.

The Center uses supplementary skin-shock as an aversive therapy. When a child displays an unwanted behavior, electrodes placed on various part of the body electrically shock the child. These electrodes remain on the child 24 hours a day. Think shocking is bad enough? It gets worse. One source notes, "It's the only school in the US that allows painful shocks of children, sometimes tying them down for long sessions of shocks. 'Hot-saucing,' extreme food deprivation, and other corporal punishments are routine and frequent."  http://www.nospank.net/jrc-1.htm

Any staff can distribute such punishment. If I were hired, and underwent brief training, I would get my own buzzer. I would be shocking children. I could never live with myself. I have worked at two facilities that did not use any aversive therapies. I have seen children progress and grow through nurturing and non-physical consequences. I know first hand that it is not necessary to see improvement.

I'll play the devil's advocate and admit such treatment has been proven effective in some circumstances. However, can such progress be due to simply scaring a child well? Even given its effectiveness, can such treatment be considered just? Where can we draw the line and start calling such treatment abuse?

I am shocked and disgusted that such treatment isn't illegal. The Center has been investigated several times, and somehow it manages to continue with such horrific punishment. The time for change is now. Look at the website for yourself, it's real. Is their version of "tough love" justified? I urge you to join me in my battle to raise awareness and put an end to such torture. There is an amendment (#765) currently in review that would ban such punishment in the state of Massachusetts. Please contact our representatives and urge them to vote yes. Letters can be sent to House Speaker Sal DiMasi (Rdeleo@hwm.state.ma.us), Rep. Marie St. Fleur (Rep.MarieSt.Fleur@hou.state.ma.us), and Rep. Vinny deMacedo
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #26 on: February 09, 2008, 11:31:13 AM »
From the "COMMENTS" Section for this article in my previous post:

Quote
THE COMMENT
BRIDGEWATER STATE COLLEGE'S STUDENT RUN NEWSPAPER SINCE 1927
Judging the Judge: An Examination of the Judge Rotenberg Center
Michelle Lyons
Issue date:
2/7/08 Section: Opinion



paul kelly
posted 2/07/08 @ 9:04 PM EST

Hi Michele... Great article about the JRC. As a person who lives in Canton near the JRC I keep an eye on what goes on there. They had a student overpower a 19 year old woman and jump out a bus on interstate rt. #95 and die. They can't keep help because of low wages and staff treament.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #27 on: February 10, 2008, 02:44:49 PM »
The Patriot Ledger
Report: Third student targeted in shock-prank
By TOM BENNER
Patriot Ledger State House Bureau

Transmitted Saturday, February 09, 2008


BOSTON - A third emotionally disturbed student might have been an additional victim in an Aug. 26 skin-shock prank at a group home in Stoughton run by the Judge Rotenberg Education Center, a new state report says.

The report, by the Department of Social Services, reveals a 15-year-old boy from New York was present when employees administered dozens of shocks to two other students on the instructions of a prank caller posing as a supervisor.

The other two victims were a 19-year-old from Halifax, who was shocked 77 times, and a 16-year-old from Virginia, who was shocked 29 times.

The report, released shortly before 5 p.m. Friday, said the 15-year-old had been an intended victim but was inconclusive about whether he was given wrongful skin shocks at the direction of the prank caller. DSS Commissioner Angelo McClain declined through a spokesman to comment further. A criminal investigation by the Norfolk County District Attorney is ongoing.

School spokesman Ernie Corrigan said the report is vague about whether the third student had been subject to abuse or neglect.

The report supports one of two allegations of physical abuse by two JRC staff members, and 15 allegations of neglect by eight staff members.

Seven employees were fired in October for their involvement in the incident after an initial state investigation found a series of errors and missteps by the staff.

Critics of the Canton-based school - the only one in the country believed to use skin shocks to punish misbehavior - say the report is further proof that so-called aversive therapy at the school is cruel and inhumane.

"It's another agency supporting what I've been saying all along: this place is out of control," said Sen. Brian A. Joyce, a Milton Democrat seeking to pass legislation banning or restricting the use of electric skin shocks.

The school has more than 200 students, most of whom are mentally retarded, autistic or emotionally disturbed. School officials say the treatments are used in a minority of cases, and only with parental, medical, psychiatric and court approval.

In the early morning hours of Aug. 26, a former student phoned one of the school’s group homes in Stoughton and posing as a supervisor, ordered the students to be given shocks.

The Aug. 26 incident was recorded by video cameras. Rotenberg center officials destroyed copies of the tape despite an order by state investigators to preserve them.

Tom Benner may be reached at tbenner@ledger.com .

Copyright 2008 The Patriot Ledger
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #28 on: February 11, 2008, 02:57:52 PM »
Yanno, I think the bear needs to make these people his business.

And by that, I mean the binnis. After digestion proceeded by a mauling and thorough mastication!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Showdown over shock therapy
« Reply #29 on: March 02, 2008, 10:23:54 PM »
The Massachusetts Joint Committee on Children and Families has about two more weeks to make a decision regarding the Judge Rotenberg Center.

Please take a second to call the chairwomen of the committee and tell them to support H 109, a bill that would outlaw all aversive shock treatment.

Senator Spilka: 617-722-1640
Representative Coakley-Rivera: 617-722-2011
(wait for mailbox)

Optional Script:

Hello, my name is ________ and I'm from ________. I am calling to urge (Senator Spilka/Representative Coakley-Rivera) to take action against cruel aversive shock treatment in Massachsetts by supporting bill H 109. The treatment used at the Judge Rotenberg Center is inhumane and unsafe, and the prank call incident in August demonstrates this. The Commonwealth must work to provide alternative education opportunities to people with disabilities that do not involve the infliction of pain. Thank you.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »