Author Topic: Excessive Restraints  (Read 21109 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline CCM girl 1989

  • Posts: 1308
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #90 on: November 27, 2007, 05:03:44 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
do really enjoy childish here?

I mean, are you really proud of your blathering fantasy's?

& you want people to take you seriously?

You are one of the most self-aggrandizing twits (aside from TheWho) supposedly over the age of 12, I have ever had the misfortune to encounter on a forum, any forum.


You're killing me with these big words! Okay, I found it!

self-aggrandizement: The act of making oneself more powerful, wealthy, etc. esp. in a ruthless way.


I just thought I'd post it for everyone since I had no clue what this person meant?!! I still don't think that word applies to me. Whatever!!!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
f you were never in a program, or a parent of a child in a program, then you have no business posting here.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #91 on: November 27, 2007, 05:06:18 PM »
We can argue about AP's and efficacy - i don't think that's useful - however, I will say chemical restraints and "tx" dosages are another thing entirely.

TheWho keeps spinning yarns with some kind of crazy authority.

i seriously wonder if he has a napolean complex or what.

Apparently, he is also the GREAT OZ.

Mostly, he's FOS - that's medical slang for "Full O' Shit"!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #92 on: November 27, 2007, 05:09:29 PM »
Quote from: ""CCM girl 1989""
Quote from: ""Guest""
do really enjoy childish here?

I mean, are you really proud of your blathering fantasy's?

& you want people to take you seriously?

You are one of the most self-aggrandizing twits (aside from TheWho) supposedly over the age of 12, I have ever had the misfortune to encounter on a forum, any forum.

You're killing me with these big words! Okay, I found it!

self-aggrandizement: The act of making oneself more powerful, wealthy, etc. esp. in a ruthless way.


I just thought I'd post it for everyone since I had no clue what this person meant?!! I still don't think that word applies to me. Whatever!!!!!

How dare they speak that way about You, Goddess Ccm!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #93 on: November 27, 2007, 05:10:37 PM »
self-aggrandizement fits the two of you perfectly -

Quote
1. noun
an act undertaken to increase your own power and influence or to draw attention to your own importance  

2.noun
increase of one's own power, wealth, etc., usually aggressively.  

3.n.   The act or practice of enhancing or exaggerating one's own importance, power, or reputation.


it's totally true.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline CCM girl 1989

  • Posts: 1308
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #94 on: November 27, 2007, 05:18:09 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote
Paucity! Wow, had to look that one up! In regards to RL....I'm not sure paucity is the right word? I haven't seen him in almost 20 years?!!

um, if you knew what paucity meant, you would'nt have made such an obviously asinine statement.

But thanks for confirming the non-existence of any meaningful conversation and an IQ on your behalf.


Under the word paucity it just says fewness; small number????

Well, I have had zero to do with WWASPS.

You said there must be a paucity of RL events in my life???? I don't communicate with him, or anyone from that program? Sorry, if you were a little more clear....maybe I would understand your jibber-jabber.

Please, dumb it down for me! Or get me a new dictionary?!!! Hahahahaha, try to have a little fun, would you?!!! Geez!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
f you were never in a program, or a parent of a child in a program, then you have no business posting here.

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #95 on: November 27, 2007, 05:19:19 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
We can argue about AP's and efficacy - i don't think that's useful - however, I will say chemical restraints and "tx" dosages are another thing entirely.

TheWho keeps spinning yarns with some kind of crazy authority.

i seriously wonder if he has a napolean complex or what.

Apparently, he is also the GREAT OZ.

Mostly, he's FOS - that's medical slang for "Full O' Shit"!


Thats what TheWho is saying!!  It seems you dont understand the difference.
Try Rereading the post
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #96 on: November 27, 2007, 05:21:35 PM »
Quote
Thats what TheWho is saying!! It seems you dont understand the difference.
Try Rereading the post


& you anon, are thewho.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #97 on: November 27, 2007, 05:24:52 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote
Thats what TheWho is saying!! It seems you dont understand the difference.
Try Rereading the post

& you anon, are thewho.


No that was Deborah,  I am Thewho Ha,Ha,Ha,
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #98 on: November 27, 2007, 05:25:07 PM »
Yes, CCM girl - paucity of RL events - as in "you have no life so you invent one here". As in, your previous confession to coming to fornits because you had zero friends when you moved to the Bay area and ample time.

No friends+free time=CCMgirl

oh clueless one, maybe one day you will get a brain.

Until then, you are doomed to harangue fornits and befriend TheWho.

Such is your lot in life.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #99 on: November 27, 2007, 05:26:33 PM »
No, the one before that one was TheWho.  The other one was Deborah's


^^^^^^theWho^^^^^
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #100 on: November 27, 2007, 05:30:20 PM »
nope - not deborah - guess again.

on second thought, nevermind.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline CCM girl 1989

  • Posts: 1308
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #101 on: November 27, 2007, 05:33:39 PM »
Quote from: ""pseudo""
Quote from: ""CCM girl 1989""
Quote from: ""Guest""
do really enjoy childish here?

I mean, are you really proud of your blathering fantasy's?

& you want people to take you seriously?

You are one of the most self-aggrandizing twits (aside from TheWho) supposedly over the age of 12, I have ever had the misfortune to encounter on a forum, any forum.

You're killing me with these big words! Okay, I found it!

self-aggrandizement: The act of making oneself more powerful, wealthy, etc. esp. in a ruthless way.


I just thought I'd post it for everyone since I had no clue what this person meant?!! I still don't think that word applies to me. Whatever!!!!!
How dare they speak that way about You, Goddess Ccm!!



I know I cannot believe the way they speak about me either, LOL!!! As far as being childish? Come on! There are many of the regulars here that are far more immature/childish then I am. Besides, who comes here expecting mature posts anymore. I personally lost all hopes for that a long time ago.

I tried to be serious. Then when I realized it was wasted effort to try and be open, and honest with people on here, I decided not to take things as seriously as I once did.

There are a small number of people on here that do know me on a more personal level then the majority of you. Keep in mind it's fewer then 5.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
f you were never in a program, or a parent of a child in a program, then you have no business posting here.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Now the tread is derailing again
« Reply #102 on: November 27, 2007, 05:41:03 PM »
Now the tread is beginning to be about relationship between who and CCM. That is exactly as interesting as reading about Amber and Peter, when they were fooled into Foreland Hamlet.

Could we discuss reality instead?

How can we get into the parent group on google? They must have a idea about what a body net is?

I know that the parents here on this forum did not place their kid in PV, but what did they think the body net and the jacket meant? They use so nice words, but do they fool anyone?

Zen: What did you think that they meant with the jacket and net before you actually saw it?

Settle: Did you ever discuss these items with your parents? Did they know what they actually consented to?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline CCM girl 1989

  • Posts: 1308
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #103 on: November 27, 2007, 05:45:35 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Yes, CCM girl - paucity of RL events - as in "you have no life so you invent one here". As in, your previous confession to coming to fornits because you had zero friends when you moved to the Bay area and ample time.

No friends+free time=CCMgirl

oh clueless one, maybe one day you will get a brain.

Until then, you are doomed to harangue fornits and befriend TheWho.

Such is your lot in life.



Do me a favor, and get your facts straight! I never said I came to Fornits because I had no friends. I found Fornits when I moved to a new area, and for the first time in 15 years wasn't bombarded with work.

I lived in the bay area after I left Cross Creek Manor back in 1990. I did move 2 hours away a couple years ago though. But, that didn't mean my friends disappeared on me! I did purchase some pigeons, and I am able to communicate with friends occasionally. That's if they don't go MIA on me, LOL!!!!

I post here because I have my own set of opinions on programs. It's really pretty simple. But, I appreciate all the put downs! Love you too. :-)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
f you were never in a program, or a parent of a child in a program, then you have no business posting here.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Excessive Restraints
« Reply #104 on: November 27, 2007, 06:03:07 PM »
Quote
Could we discuss reality instead?

How can we get into the parent group on google? They must have a idea about what a body net is?

I know that the parents here on this forum did not place their kid in PV, but what did they think the body net and the jacket meant? They use so nice words, but do they fool anyone?

Zen: What did you think that they meant with the jacket and net before you actually saw it?

Settle: Did you ever discuss these items with your parents? Did they know what they actually consented to?


thank you - back to reality.

body nets have more historical use in prisons nowadays, they use it to restarin the psychiatric patients who "happen to be" incarcerated. Quite a few inmates have had "adverse reactions" to body nets - (ie - they died)

- they are considered the most restrictive - and people ususally end up in them for days at a time. I'm sure you can do a search on all the data that's been taken on the mortality of using these devices in institutions. it isn't pretty.

as the cwla site states, it's difficult to do studies on TBS's , maninly because they are not regulated and therefor hard to track and quantify. It's apples and oranges - anyone who can quantify that data is clearly blowing smoke where the sun doesn't shine (ie. TheWho).

It's chilling to think this devices are used on children as a matter of course and first line of defense, rather than a last ditch effort.

You think if you were paying someone in excess of $60,000 per year, they would be better able to handle problems with "troubled adolescents" - rather than resorting to brute force.

It's sad.

Sadder still, are the people who actaully rally around the sadistic forms of treatment in the name of 'therapy' and "helping".
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »