« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Pity for the Who  (Read 2914 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Pity for the Who
« on: November 15, 2007, 10:19:52 AM »
This guy claims he's just a dad, then mentions he has a fiduciary interest in Aspen... I always assume he's just a shill...

But, can you imagine if he's really just a program parent? How sad that would be?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Pity for the Who
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2007, 10:24:08 AM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
This guy claims he's just a dad, then mentions he has a fiduciary interest in Aspen... I always assume he's just a shill...

But, can you imagine if he's really just a program parent? How sad that would be?


Maybe we should have a pity party for him.  Being a mere program parent is only one step up from being a program survivor.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Pity for the Who
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2007, 10:26:36 AM »
Being a mere program parent is one step up from being a concentration camp guard.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Pity for the Who
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2007, 10:29:24 AM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Being a mere program parent is one step up from being a concentration camp guard.


No doubt, but can u imagine spending all your time here, if you really "just want to give people" another side of things. It's just sad.

I mean, imagine your dad doing it....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Pity for the Who
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2007, 11:31:54 AM »
He's a shill ,right? Not a koolaid drinker?
What do you think?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Pity for the Who
« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2007, 11:42:57 AM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
This guy claims he's just a dad, then mentions he has a fiduciary interest in Aspen...



Where?  I've always suspected as much but didn't see him admit to it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Pity for the Who
« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2007, 11:45:44 AM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Guest""
This guy claims he's just a dad, then mentions he has a fiduciary interest in Aspen...


Where?  I've always suspected as much but didn't see him admit to it.


Oh, look up in the HLA forum...its there somewhere. Something is being discussed in regards to who's the new investor, or some such. Who chimes in with :i cannot comment as i have a fiduciary interest.

Shit better go before he erases it
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Pity for the Who
« Reply #7 on: November 15, 2007, 11:48:41 AM »
http://wwf.fornits.com/viewtopic.php?p=283976#283976

Quote from: ""TheWho""
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""TheWho""
Quote from: ""Guest""
When is this supposed to take place?

Well the  announcement takes place after the lawyers sign off on the deal, but they usually wait until the transfer is ready to take place.
The legal transfer typically takes place at the beginning of the new quarter (or fiscal year).
So based on this I would expect the announcement would come at anytime and the transfer could occur on Tuesday October 1, 2007 or early January 2008.

...


How is it that you are in a position to have knowledge about the acquisition of HLA?


I apologize for being vague, I have a fiduciary duty which prevents me from speaking in any specific terms in this area and can only comment on information which is first made public by either party involved,  this could be misconstrued as “Tippingâ€
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Pity for the Who
« Reply #8 on: November 15, 2007, 12:56:30 PM »
A fiduciary duty is not the same as a financial interest.  He could be representing them as an investment banker, financial advisor, attorney or otherwise.  A fiduciary owes a duty of confidentiality and trust.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Pity for the Who
« Reply #9 on: November 15, 2007, 12:57:18 PM »
http://wwf.fornits.com/viewtopic.php?p=283976#283976

Quote from: "TheWho"

I apologize for being vague, I have a fiduciary duty which prevents me from speaking in any specific terms in this area and can only comment on information which is first made public by either party involved,  this could be misconstrued as “Tippingâ€
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Pity for the Who
« Reply #10 on: November 15, 2007, 01:07:30 PM »
Quote
A fiduciary owes a duty of confidentiality and trust.


:lol: They sure picked the wrong guy here then, didn't they?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Pity for the Who
« Reply #11 on: November 15, 2007, 01:14:01 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
A fiduciary duty is not the same as a financial interest.  He could be representing them as an investment banker, financial advisor, attorney or otherwise.  A fiduciary owes a duty of confidentiality and trust.



What's your point?

 :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Botched Programming

  • Posts: 1197
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Pity for the Who
« Reply #12 on: November 15, 2007, 01:30:31 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
A fiduciary duty is not the same as a financial interest.  He could be representing them as an investment banker, financial advisor, attorney or otherwise.  A fiduciary owes a duty of confidentiality and trust.


Even using the examples you provided, there is still money going into the pocket whether it be directly from the facility, or indirectly coming from his employer.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Pity for the Who
« Reply #13 on: November 15, 2007, 01:35:47 PM »
Quote from: ""Botched Programming""
Quote from: ""Guest""
A fiduciary duty is not the same as a financial interest.  He could be representing them as an investment banker, financial advisor, attorney or otherwise.  A fiduciary owes a duty of confidentiality and trust.

Even using the examples you provided, there is still money going into the pocket whether it be directly from the facility, or indirectly coming from his employer.




Either that, or Daddy is.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Pity for the Who
« Reply #14 on: November 15, 2007, 01:59:57 PM »
symantics?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »