Author Topic: Genuinely interested but not impressed Part I  (Read 4916 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Re: In my Defense
« Reply #30 on: October 30, 2007, 06:36:24 AM »
That's an impressive litany of disaster there, friend.

Quote from: "Interested"
I have not been convinced that AARC is a cult. I am also not convinced that AARC is flawless, and should be given free reign to rule itself without checks and balances, accountability, and monitoring by some sort of agency. I do feel there is a need for something “likeâ€
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Genuinely interested but not impressed Part I
« Reply #31 on: October 30, 2007, 02:12:20 PM »
Yeah, it amazes me that anyone can claim that "oh abuse is just fine because addicts need it to recover."  Here's a list of the harms done by addiction, so let's use it to justify harming more addicts with fake, harmful "treatment."

there's no evidence that any treatment based on Straight works-- what is original about the Straight model is harmful, what is not harmful is not original and can be found in decent programs everywhere.  So there's no reason any program using host homes, oldcomers, any of that nonsense should be open.  Period.

 in fact, fear of abusive treatment is one of the reasons real addicts *don't* seek help.  research shows that most of the "denial" seen in addicts dissolves when you treat them kindly and offer hope.  the "denial" is a defense against attack, and attacks actually reinforce it, making matters worse!!!

The research is clear that empathetic, kind, supportive programs work and humiliating confrontational and attacking ones are neither safe nor effective.

Interested is obviously a shill for AARC because anyone without a 'dog in this fight' wouldn't claim to support it if they knew anything at all about what works and what doesn't in the addictions field.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »