Bring out your Diggs, bring out your Diggs...

[Anonymous]

http://digg.com/politics/Aspen_Educatio ... es_parents

We have the people here to bump this fucker up regardless of programmies trying to bury it.

[Anonymous]

Digg's down, maybe the story broke it? :lol:

[Anonymous]

Back up, Dugg.

[Anonymous]

Making a Digg account takes less time than taking a shit. Use mailin8r.com if you don't want to put a real email address.

[hanzomon4]

Prepare to be baned and the topic removed, happened to a few of us in regards to sue scheff diggs. I'm sure Aspen has enough lawyers to bury the truth in the same way

[Anonymous]

Then make them use them.

[TheWho]

Prepare to be baned and the topic removed, happened to a few of us in regards to sue scheff diggs. I'm sure Aspen has enough lawyers to bury the truth in the same way

If you are honest and telling the truth then you will not be banned nor the post taken down.
If you refer to the schools as prisons and the kids as inmates, living in cells for example, then you are spreading inaccurate information.  Just tell the truth and your posts will remain.

[hanzomon4]

Prepare to be baned and the topic removed, happened to a few of us in regards to sue scheff diggs. I'm sure Aspen has enough lawyers to bury the truth in the same way

If you are honest and telling the truth then you will not be banned nor the post taken down.
If you refer to the schools as prisons and the kids as inmates, living in cells for example, then you are spreading inaccurate information.  Just tell the truth and your posts will remain.

Umm... How is that inaccurate?

[TheWho]

Prepare to be baned and the topic removed, happened to a few of us in regards to sue scheff diggs. I'm sure Aspen has enough lawyers to bury the truth in the same way

If you are honest and telling the truth then you will not be banned nor the post taken down.
If you refer to the schools as prisons and the kids as inmates, living in cells for example, then you are spreading inaccurate information.  Just tell the truth and your posts will remain.

Umm... How is that inaccurate?

For example, if you claimed the kids are living in prison cells and it is determined that no cells exist on the campus of these schools then that would be considered inaccurate and throw into question the validity of everything else that is stated and subsequently could be taken down.

I have seen it here before.....  kids who are reported to have died in a TBS and it turns out the child was never even near one, so the whole list becomes suspect.
Hanzo, you should know this!  The information has to be accurate, not just a smear campaign.  They are right to take it down for that reason.

[hanzomon4]

First of all the scheff post were accurate and were reported by Maia and Paula Reeves. Second no matter what you want to call them locking a kid up against their will is imprisonment and when you have locks and alarms on the doors and windows it's a cell, it's not a mental hospital cause they don't provide mental health services. Reports from survivors of these programs do not equal smear campaigns just cause the truth is ugly, you should know that who!!!!
 ::roflmao::  ::roflmao::

[TheWho]

First of all the scheff post were accurate and were reported by Maia and Paula Reeves. Second no matter what you want to call them locking a kid up against their will is imprisonment and when you have locks and alarms on the doors and windows it's a cell, it's not a mental hospital cause they don't provide mental health services. Reports from survivors of these programs do not equal smear campaigns just cause the truth is ugly, you should know that who!!!!
 ::roflmao::  ::roflmao::

Well, I didn’t read the Sue S.  articles on Digg so I cant comment.  But my point is if the industry refers to the kids as inmates living in cells and this is how it is defined then that is okay but if not then it amounts to a smear campaign and they have the right to pull it.  I know you know this, Hanzo.

Lets say Wendys had a few cases of food poisoning and you wrote and article depicting the restaurant chain as “E. Coli centralâ€

[3xsaSeedling]

Most people know that kids can just walk away or break some rules and get expelled if they dont like the school they are in.

yeahsureright

[hanzomon4]

First of all the scheff post were accurate and were reported by Maia and Paula Reeves. Second no matter what you want to call them locking a kid up against their will is imprisonment and when you have locks and alarms on the doors and windows it's a cell, it's not a mental hospital cause they don't provide mental health services. Reports from survivors of these programs do not equal smear campaigns just cause the truth is ugly, you should know that who!!!!
 ::roflmao::  ::roflmao::

Well, I didn’t read the Sue S.  articles on Digg so I cant comment.  But my point is if the industry refers to the kids as inmates living in cells and this is how it is defined then that is okay but if not then it amounts to a smear campaign and they have the right to pull it.  I know you know this, Hanzo.

Lets say Wendys had a few cases of food poisoning and you wrote and article depicting the restaurant chain as “E. Coli centralâ€

[TheWho]

Well I guess in schools yeah but in prisons that don't happen.

Exactly, and that is what I am talking about...these are schools, they call themselves schools.  If they were prisons they would call themselves that.  If you interchange the two you lose credibility and the readers along with it.

Look, if you say "some of these schools keep kids against their will"...."Many kids attending these schools dont want to be there"  you will keep people’s attention and they will continue to read, but if you use the word prison all the time you sound like someone who has and axe to grind not information to disseminate...see what I mean?

If you were reading an article by a person referring to cars as "death traps" and everyone who drives one is going to die.....  wouldn’t you sense this guy isn’t about to give you a balanced or true account in his article...he is heavily biased to one side and that is all you are going to get from him, you wont get an intelligent read from him…. This is how people treat the articles that refer to the schools as prisons.

I don’t expect anyone to take my advice because I understand the mentality here, but I am right, ask someone who is outside of fornits…its just my opinion.

[hanzomon4]

Well I guess in schools yeah but in prisons that don't happen.

Exactly, and that is what I am talking about...these are schools, they call themselves schools.  If they were prisons they would call themselves that.  If you interchange the two you lose credibility and the readers along with it.

Look, if you say "some of these schools keep kids against their will"...."Many kids attending these schools dont want to be there"  you will keep people’s attention and they will continue to read, but if you use the word prison all the time you sound like someone who has and axe to grind not information to disseminate...see what I mean?

If you were reading an article by a person referring to cars as "death traps" and everyone who drives one is going to die.....  wouldn’t you sense this guy isn’t about to give you a balanced or true account in his article...he is heavily biased to one side and that is all you are going to get from him, you wont get an intelligent read from him…. This is how people treat the articles that refer to the schools as prisons.

I don’t expect anyone to take my advice because I understand the mentality here, but I am right, ask someone who is outside of fornits…its just my opinion.

Hey if the car is a death trap it's a death trap. And no these places are not schools, in fact that's what usually gets them into deep shit... Again the truth may be ugly but it is what it is. Referring to Straight as a rehab or CEDU-Aspen as a school is inaccurate, the public may find that easier to swallow but they learn nothing... So