Author Topic: Scheff's attempt to not allow peaceful protest.  (Read 12389 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Scheff's attempt to not allow peaceful protest.
« Reply #30 on: September 09, 2007, 12:53:13 PM »
a jew would never commit such flagrant abuse on children for money.

and if she is jewish, i can go talk to my lubavich freind, and she'll be blacklisted from every reform lubavich-run synagauge in the country.  

you cant get "excommunicated", but she can be blocked entry, denied services, and given dirty looks. she'd be lucky to find a rabbi willing to help her for any sort of birth, barmitzvah, death, wedding, etc.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Scheff's attempt to not allow peaceful protest.
« Reply #31 on: September 09, 2007, 01:10:21 PM »
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Scheff's attempt to not allow peaceful protest.
« Reply #32 on: September 09, 2007, 01:37:06 PM »
Boy, you guys just don't get it do you? The first issue has already been settled many times in many courts examining many cases. Neither the hosting provider nor the website admin are responsible for what you turkeys say to or about one another. Sue and her faithful jabberwock David know this very well. If you've got your nose out of joint about something written here or elsewhere you'll have to go after the writer not the hosting provider. Wouldn't really make no never mind to us.

And that one particular anon above? God, but do I wish I could bust them out! Technically, of course, I could. And the admins all have had a good belly laugh over the particular comment above. Oh, the hypocrisy!

But that's typical of what passes for thinking among the Program faithful.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Scheff's attempt to not allow peaceful protest.
« Reply #33 on: September 09, 2007, 05:41:27 PM »
Ginger,

I don't think you know what you're playing with here.  Or maybe you really believe that you're above law and common decency.

Just like you can't yell "fire" in a crowded theater in the real world, there's got to be--and there's going to be--responsibility expected of people in cyber space.  In the real world, if a person owns property and lets others live there who are performing criminal acts or who are just a nuisance in terms of police calls, at least in many places, the owner is definitely NOT off the hook.  The owner in many juristictions gets fined or the property is closed down or condemned.  Or maybe the owner even gets charged with conspiracy with respect to the acts in question, right along with the low-lifes he/she harbored.

Recent anti-terrorism legislation with regard to cyberspace stalking leaves plenty of expansion room to hold people accountable who takes part in actions that harm others using the internet.  Anyone who can read should be able to see that.

In my own case, I was naive enough to become a poster in your forum.  My crime was that I disagreed with the party line here.   As a result I was threatened with death by some lunatic as was my minor child.  You were aware of this because I contacted you about it.  My name with phone number and address (including google map) were posted here and allowed to remain, in fact posted many times, to be read by other lunatics who frequent the site.  Of course, if I had had idea that "anonymous" here doesn't really anonymous, that IP addresses are shared with chosen posters, that posts are altered (ask the WHO), I'd have never had anything to do with your enterprise or the ongoing conspiracy among hte like-minded that exists here.

I am telling you: all it takes is one tragedy, Ginger, either based on the sewage that oozes from your board or even from some other board where the same non-standards of behavior apply.  

See how quickly a state or federal conspiracy law is interpreted to apply to YOU and certain posters who think they are so free to say what they like, to lie, to threaten, to slander.  See how that plays out in the judicial court or the court of public opinion.   And believe me, if that time comes with respect to you, I'll be there with all these terrible posts (which are safely saved), as I believe will others who were similarly treated, to illustrate the kind of entity fornit's is.  In the mean time, if there is anything I can do to help Sue Scheff who clearly has been treated much worse than I have, I am so willing to do so.

Anne Hall
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
« Reply #34 on: September 09, 2007, 05:53:54 PM »
BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
/r/ summary
« Reply #35 on: September 09, 2007, 06:01:32 PM »
Can someone summarize who this whining bitch is, and where her dox are so we can take it to the next level?  I am not familiar with the situation, I just saw this truly epic lulz.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Information on Anonymous
« Reply #36 on: September 09, 2007, 06:08:25 PM »
Anonymous is rumored to do the following:

    * Hate dogs (due to their ability to detect the cybernetic implants of Internet Hate Machines)
    * Hate curtains, especially dog curtains. Apparently anonymous really dislikes not being able to see through windows.
    * Blow up stadiums apparently
    * Blow up yellow vans (repeatedly)
    * Rape your mom
    * Slit throats
    * Corrupt safe LOLS into dangerous LULZ
    * Liek cats (especially of the uncorrupted lolcat variety but an ordinary cat is fine too)
    * Fuck your sister's ass

Anonymous will target furfags, DevianTART members, 16-year-old girls, your mom, pedophiles and you.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Scheff's attempt to not allow peaceful protest.
« Reply #37 on: September 09, 2007, 10:01:07 PM »
There are not enough Mudkips in these forums.  We demand our Mudkips or we will taunt you a second teim!!!!!!!!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Scheff's attempt to not allow peaceful protest.
« Reply #38 on: September 10, 2007, 12:54:17 AM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Ginger,

I don't think you know what you're playing with here.  Or maybe you really believe that you're above law and common decency.

Just like you can't yell "fire" in a crowded theater in the real world, there's got to be--and there's going to be--responsibility expected of people in cyber space.  In the real world, if a person owns property and lets others live there who are performing criminal acts or who are just a nuisance in terms of police calls, at least in many places, the owner is definitely NOT off the hook.  The owner in many juristictions gets fined or the property is closed down or condemned.  Or maybe the owner even gets charged with conspiracy with respect to the acts in question, right along with the low-lifes he/she harbored.

Recent anti-terrorism legislation with regard to cyberspace stalking leaves plenty of expansion room to hold people accountable who takes part in actions that harm others using the internet.  Anyone who can read should be able to see that.

In my own case, I was naive enough to become a poster in your forum.  My crime was that I disagreed with the party line here.   As a result I was threatened with death by some lunatic as was my minor child.  You were aware of this because I contacted you about it.  My name with phone number and address (including google map) were posted here and allowed to remain, in fact posted many times, to be read by other lunatics who frequent the site.  Of course, if I had had idea that "anonymous" here doesn't really anonymous, that IP addresses are shared with chosen posters, that posts are altered (ask the WHO), I'd have never had anything to do with your enterprise or the ongoing conspiracy among hte like-minded that exists here.

I am telling you: all it takes is one tragedy, Ginger, either based on the sewage that oozes from your board or even from some other board where the same non-standards of behavior apply.  

See how quickly a state or federal conspiracy law is interpreted to apply to YOU and certain posters who think they are so free to say what they like, to lie, to threaten, to slander.  See how that plays out in the judicial court or the court of public opinion.   And believe me, if that time comes with respect to you, I'll be there with all these terrible posts (which are safely saved), as I believe will others who were similarly treated, to illustrate the kind of entity fornit's is.  In the mean time, if there is anything I can do to help Sue Scheff who clearly has been treated much worse than I have, I am so willing to do so.

Anne Hall



Ok.  Normally I am very diplomatic with you, Anne S. Hall, but I'm going to have to say... your name really fits.  You must be a complete lunatic to defend Sue Scheff.

I can see the wheels turning in your brain:
 - for whatever reason, you were verbally attacked on this forum.
 - since sue scheff has been attacked on this board, she must be perfectly innocent. Where is the logic here?

You really don't like Fornits.  Why?  Because of some personal disagreement, which, considering your recent behavior was probably provoked by you.

Ok.  Consider that you've publicly stated that you looked up to Mel Wasserman etc... You really expect a positive reaction.  You talk about personal responsibility?  Where does YOUR personal responsibility factor into this equation?

You come onto a bulletin board filled with people who very publicly don't like people like you and expect to be received with open arms.  Also.  Once you were verbally attacked, why didn't you leave.  Why do you persist in coming back.  It seems like you can handle the Fornits crowd.

They posted personal information?  Who is responsible for making the information available in the first place?  You are!  People are smart.  They don't need IP addresses, they can figure identities out based on details of your story, agendas, etc...

You claim that Fornits posters got your IP addresses from this board.  That's incorrect.  For a very long time Your IP address was publicly viewable on strugglingteens.com  It would not be necessary to obtain your IP address from Fornits.

Tell me one case where a poster's IP address has been outed on this board (apart with the exception of moderated forums).  Can you prove it?  Otherwise what your are writing is libelous (not that it matters when you do it).

Guest postings are VERY anonymous on fornits.  There have been times that i've asked people for favors (to look up IP addresses) and each request was denied.

You keep your "bad" posts... let's see what a jury thinks about a woman who approves of child abuse (not that she believes marathon workshops with ritual humiliation and sleep and food deprivation are abusive).  Sure thing...  Let's see what the local CEDU graduates have to say.

You're a brainwashed program parent who never stopped sucking down the kool-aid, Anne, but ultimately harmless.  Foam at the mouth all you want, Fornits isn't going anywhere.

If you want to go to court and defend Sue Scheff, fine by me.  Won't help her case a damn bit. (and it will be fun to see you both fuming when you lose)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: /r/ summary
« Reply #39 on: September 10, 2007, 01:08:26 AM »
Quote from: ""AnonymousNigra""
Can someone summarize who this whining bitch is, and where her dox are so we can take it to the next level?  I am not familiar with the situation, I just saw this truly epic lulz.

Anne S. Hall ("an ass hole" if you say it fast enough) is a program parent who approves quite emphatically of using cult brainwashing techinques on children to solve petty problems that could be solved at home.  She was a big fan of the CEDU family of schools before they got pwned by lawsuits of abuse etc... (she wanted to start her own school after the place got shut down).

She is allegedly a very crazy woman, and prone to threaten litigation over text on a computer screen.  Her behavior is very similar to the "Sue Scheff" series of raving-loon-program-parent.

She also gave rave reviews about Landmark Forum (another cult).

If you're looking for Lulz, you should check out Sue Scheff.  If you ask me, Sue has far more "Lulz potential"... check this quote out:
Quote
Scheff said she was so embarrassed that she became housebound. "Literally your reputation can be ruined with the stroke of a key", she said. "I could walk away from it, but it's in cyberspace, it's out there.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Scheff's attempt to not allow peaceful protest.
« Reply #41 on: September 10, 2007, 03:36:26 PM »
NIGGERS AND JEWS BAD NEWS

also wat
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Scheff's attempt to not allow peaceful protest.
« Reply #42 on: September 10, 2007, 03:46:28 PM »
Quote from: ""wutwut""
NIGGERS AND JEWS BAD NEWS

also wat

You can troll most forums with statements like that... won't work here.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: /r/ summary
« Reply #43 on: September 10, 2007, 11:11:10 PM »
Quote from: ""psy""
Quote from: ""AnonymousNigra""
Can someone summarize who this whining bitch is, and where her dox are so we can take it to the next level?  I am not familiar with the situation, I just saw this truly epic lulz.

Anne S. Hall ("an ass hole" if you say it fast enough) is a program parent who approves quite emphatically of using cult brainwashing techinques on children to solve petty problems that could be solved at home.  She was a big fan of the CEDU family of schools before they got pwned by lawsuits of abuse etc... (she wanted to start her own school after the place got shut down).

She is allegedly a very crazy woman, and prone to threaten litigation over text on a computer screen.  Her behavior is very similar to the "Sue Scheff" series of raving-loon-program-parent.

She also gave rave reviews about Landmark Forum (another cult).

If you're looking for Lulz, you should check out Sue Scheff.  If you ask me, Sue has far more "Lulz potential"... check this quote out:
Quote
Scheff said she was so embarrassed that she became housebound. "Literally your reputation can be ruined with the stroke of a key", she said. "I could walk away from it, but it's in cyberspace, it's out there.


Etc. etc, etc.  Believe what you want to, Michael, I've no personal quarrel with you. And I'm sure not going to re-hash a lot of differences of opinion or petty arguments over interpretation of various things at this late date, what would be the point?

It's true that I, and perhaps some others, might think better of you if your method of debate didn't have to involve circa-3rd-grade mockery-games about how a person's name sounds phonetically (ie "an asshole" if you say it fast enough).

But the bottom line is that I believe that some of the things that happen at this site have to stop: if I can do anything to assist in that, I'm going to.

That's just about it,

Anne Hall
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anne Bonney

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5006
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: /r/ summary
« Reply #44 on: September 10, 2007, 11:17:41 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Etc. etc, etc.  Believe what you want to, Michael, I've no personal quarrel with you. And I'm sure not going to re-hash a lot of differences of opinion or petty arguments over interpretation of various things at this late date, what would be the point?

It's true that I, and perhaps some others, might think better of you if your method of debate didn't have to involve circa-3rd-grade mockery-games about how a person's name sounds phonetically (ie "an asshole" if you say it fast enough).

But the bottom line is that I believe that some of the things that happen at this site have to stop: if I can do anything to assist in that, I'm going to.

That's just about it,

Anne Hall




Fuck off you psychotic, schizophrenic idiot.  

 ::both::  ::fuckoff::  ::both::  ::fuckoff::  ::both::  ::fuckoff::  ::both::  ::both::  ::fuckoff::



Damn woman.  Go get laid.  Smoke a bowl.  Do something.

 :roll:  :rofl:  :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
traight, St. Pete, early 80s
AA is a cult http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-cult.html

The more boring a child is, the more the parents, when showing off the child, receive adulation for being good parents-- because they have a tame child-creature in their house.  ~~  Frank Zappa