« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Appeal Bock v Scheff  (Read 1815 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Appeal Bock v Scheff
« on: August 26, 2007, 05:45:17 PM »
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal Docket  

Case Docket
Case Number:  4D07-3283
Final Civil Other Notice from Broward County  


CAREY BOCK  vs.  SUSAN SCHEFF, ETC., ET AL.


Lower Tribunal Case(s): 03-22837 18

       

Date Docketed Description Date Due Filed By Notes
08/22/2007  Case Filing Fee      
08/22/2007  Notice of Appeal Filed   Thomas H. Mcgowan 0234052, Appellant    
08/22/2007  order appealed
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Appeal Bock v Scheff
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2007, 05:58:38 PM »
I would just LOVE it if this appeal is successful, given how much noise Sue Scheff has been making and the mileage she's got out of this case thus far...  She'll have some back-pedaling to do, ha!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline ZenAgent

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1720
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.freepowerboards.com/strugglingppl/index.php
Appeal Bock v Scheff
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2007, 09:23:10 PM »
Quote from: ""Ursus""
I would just LOVE it if this appeal is successful, given how much noise Sue Scheff has been making and the mileage she's got out of this case thus far...  She'll have some back-pedaling to do, ha!


Yeah!  Sue's next blog:  "The truth prevailed...until Carey showed up in Court, and then  the truth was derailed, but PURE and myself are still the voice of the children...really..."

At that point, I hope WWASP rears it's ugly head again.  WWASP vs. PURE, 2:  The Rematch.  After reading the transcripts of the first trial, I wonder why the Judge didn't find them both guilty of crimes against nature and send them to Siberia.  It was so obvious that both litigants were scum...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
\"Allah does not love the public utterance of hurtful speech, unless it be by one to whom injustice has been done; and Allah is Hearing, Knowing\" - The Qur\'an

_______________________________________________
A PV counselor\'s description of his job:

\"I\'m there to handle kids that are psychotic, suicidal, homicidal, or have commited felonies. Oh yeah, I am also there to take them down when they are rowdy so the nurse can give them the booty juice.\"

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Appeal Bock v Scheff
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2007, 09:39:38 PM »
Quote from: ""ZenAgent""
Quote from: ""Ursus""
I would just LOVE it if this appeal is successful, given how much noise Sue Scheff has been making and the mileage she's got out of this case thus far...  She'll have some back-pedaling to do, ha!

Yeah!  Sue's next blog:  "The truth prevailed...until Carey showed up in Court, and then  the truth was derailed, but PURE and myself are still the voice of the children...really..."

At that point, I hope WWASP rears it's ugly head again.  WWASP vs. PURE, 2:  The Rematch.  After reading the transcripts of the first trial, I wonder why the Judge didn't find them both guilty of crimes against nature and send them to Siberia.  It was so obvious that both litigants were scum...


Hey... you're doing a disservice to Siberia!  Us bears rather like that terrain... not to mention the cultural affinity for, and historical presence of, those Amanita muscarii, ha ha ha!

Speaking of Siberia, the Red Elvises have a tune by that name that I rather like, too...
    Siberia...
    Land of broken dreams...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline ZenAgent

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1720
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.freepowerboards.com/strugglingppl/index.php
Appeal Bock v Scheff
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2007, 10:40:15 PM »
Quote from: ""Ursus""
Quote from: ""ZenAgent""
Quote from: ""Ursus""
I would just LOVE it if this appeal is successful, given how much noise Sue Scheff has been making and the mileage she's got out of this case thus far...  She'll have some back-pedaling to do, ha!

Yeah!  Sue's next blog:  "The truth prevailed...until Carey showed up in Court, and then  the truth was derailed, but PURE and myself are still the voice of the children...really..."

At that point, I hope WWASP rears it's ugly head again.  WWASP vs. PURE, 2:  The Rematch.  After reading the transcripts of the first trial, I wonder why the Judge didn't find them both guilty of crimes against nature and send them to Siberia.  It was so obvious that both litigants were scum...

Hey... you're doing a disservice to Siberia!  Us bears rather like that terrain... not to mention the cultural affinity for, and historical presence of, those Amanita muscarii, ha ha ha!

Speaking of Siberia, the Red Elvises have a tune by that name that I rather like, too...
    Siberia...
    Land of broken dreams...


You're right, apologies to my ursine brothers.  Where are we going to send them, though?  Utah is anathema to normal people, but these fiends thrive there.  I got it!  Sorry, Covergaard, but Sue, Randall Hinton, the Lichfields and the Kays are on their way to Denmark.  They'll be floating over on that squishy raft, the S.S. Izzy.

Pray for icebergs.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
\"Allah does not love the public utterance of hurtful speech, unless it be by one to whom injustice has been done; and Allah is Hearing, Knowing\" - The Qur\'an

_______________________________________________
A PV counselor\'s description of his job:

\"I\'m there to handle kids that are psychotic, suicidal, homicidal, or have commited felonies. Oh yeah, I am also there to take them down when they are rowdy so the nurse can give them the booty juice.\"

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Appeal Bock v Scheff
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2007, 11:05:40 PM »
Naaaa, make them eternally sort medical waste on the trash barges circling just outside the 200 mile limit.  That'll keep them busy for a long  l - o - n - g  time...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Appeal Bock v Scheff
« Reply #6 on: August 27, 2007, 12:47:04 AM »
I just can't wait for her to have to delete 11.3 MILLION from EVERY FUCKING BLOG RD MADE FOR HER  :rofl: and try to cover it up.

I also can't wait for her to get (PR)aiped  when she has even LESS money after trying to fight the appeal on the internets.

Oh, poor sue sue, you're going to lose more business to open criticism from a free nation!  ::boohoo::
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Appeal Bock v Scheff
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2007, 12:27:06 PM »
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »