I have spent the last while reading throug the pros and cons of AARC and the experiences that people have had while going through AARC or something similar to AARC. However, I find one thing lacking in the nay sayers argument and that is proof. Proof would consist of maybe legal evidence of any wrong doing on the part of AARC. However, because it is an experience there may not be any proof, but maybe if it is so wrong that person would make the effort to go down to AARC and confront their "abusers". This also does not seem to happen. I believe this to be because they don't want to face the hundred of people, families and kids that it has helped along the way.
Believe whatever you want. People, myself included, talked about abuses in Straight long before any lawsuits were filed. Unfortunately Straight had many friends and allies in the Florida gov't and police departments. That appears to be the case with AARC also.
I was petrified to 'confront' the people who had so horribly abused me. Especially to actually go down to the building, the belly of the beast, to do this 'confrontation'. Why would any victim put themselves through that? Being surrounded by a bunch of the 'faithful' isn't any easy thing to do. You people have a knack for turning things around and blaming the victim.
I have heard about Straight and about Kids and both sound like programs with very serious problems, but these are not AARC. They have never been AARC and they never will be AARC.
Then how do you explain the levels or phases? The confrontations? The lack of privacy, using graduates of the program as staff? How do you explain that grads of KIDS were the first 'staff' to open up AARC? How do you explain Vause being personally trained by the Devil himself, Miller Newton? How do you explain the fact that the descriptions of the program, even those by pro-program people are exactly like my descriptions of Straight?
I have no problem with any of you disliking, hating or any other feeling about AARC,
Oh, well whew! I was really worried you might have a problem with it.
:roll: :rofl:
but how about not being so cowardly about it and do something if you think you can.
Because you people scare the shit out of your victims. They are justified in cowering in fear of you freaks.
If you believe that kids and families are being abused in Calgary then I challenge you to do something about it. Why don't you come down on a Friday, why don't you talk to the government or the media.
I can't say for sure if they're being abused or not. What I can say is that every description of AARC is virtually identical to what I experienced in Straight and since AARC is a DIRECT descendant of Straight and VAUSE was trained by MILLER NEWTON. Those facts lead me to believe that what these kids are saying about their abuse is absolutely true.
I can give you one hint, no one would listen. Have you not noticed how when the media covers AARC they are all very impressed with the progress and help that the kids can recieve.
That's because they're sheep and have arrested critical thinking skills. That's where we come in. We wake them up and give them a dose of reality.
Now, do I agree with everything that AARC does, no. I would prefer to see kids left longer to use drugs and alcohol to ensure that when they come into the center they are going to have no disolusionment about thier addictions to drugs and alcohol.
Oh my god. Are you really that stupid to actually
write that down? Your suggestion is to facilitate more drug use so that the kids
really, really get that they're going to be deadinsaneorinjail without benefit of The Great and Poweful Oz? Ummmm. Riiiiiiiight. :roll:
Why not educate the parents to teach the kids about responsible use
before things get out of hand. How about not buying into all the fear mongering about how marijuana will lead to heroin and deathinsanityorjail?
However, this is not the case for some desperate parents and their kids are admitted at a young age.
So then you're admitting that AARC accepts and 'treats' kids who do not have a problem?

?
But you are gonig to be hard pressed to convince me that experience at Kids or Straight is a direct and accurate reflection of what AARC is like. AARC is accredited by the governement of Alberta, recieves money each year as funding from the government and has been approached by other provincial governments about the possibility of building an AARC in their areas.
Straight was started by grants from the Federal U.S. Gov't. It continued to be funded by them.
I'll say again, that all descriptions of AARC both pro and con are almost
identical to what I experienced in Straight.
Further, I have seen posts about graduates that have had major problems. Some have comitted major and horable crimes. Funny thing about all of that is that they were using drugs and alcohol when it happened. You don't see to many out there doing those things when they are sober.
I thought AARC was supposed to fix all that? You mean graduates of the program are having problems after getting out? GASP! NO! Really?

:roll:
So, I guess all in all, I find this site to be a little bit pathetic. You come on here to rant about a place you have never been to, or that you think that you know something about.
Yep, there's that AARC compassion for someone else who is suffering. We're all pathetic losers, right?
If you had a bad experience at AARC then I feel sorry for you because it has helped so many people.
Really? Would you care to back that up with long term studies and research? Or are you just pulling that right out of your ass? You ask us for proof, where's yours? Where is the research?
You may have reason to dislike AARC, you did not recieve the benefits that so many already have. However, for you that hate Straight and Kids and any other program out there that is NOT AARC, find something better to do with your time. Maybe if you got out and lived life like some of us you would be a whole lot happier and spend a lot less time in these places writing to people you won't meet, don't know and don't care about.
Again, we all must be losers with no life, right? Get new material, that's getting old. :roll:
AARC is a direct descendant of Straight, uses the same methods, AARC's director was trained by Miller Newton himself and Miller was run out of every single state he went to, for abuse. I guess he figured he's try his luck in another country. Wow. Looks like he did an excellent job at setting up Straight Canada a/k/a AARC.