Author Topic: Matthew Israel Interview (Judge Rotenberg Center)  (Read 8373 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Matthew Israel Interview (Judge Rotenberg Center)
« Reply #30 on: October 15, 2010, 09:25:59 PM »
Quote from: "Whooter"
Quote from: "Ursus"
That wasn't Anne's post that you just attributed to her. You just substituted your own (previous) post in its place.
I took a double take myself, Ursus, but I didnt mind that she copied and pasted my post like that, maybe she was just trying to bump it up.  If you look one post up from mine you will see she copied my post, I didnt make it up.

Link
Nope. Of course she didn't just copy your post. Note her word usage: she states that the process is "not benign," whereas you claim that it's "not abusive." A bit of a difference, dontcha think?

That was the point she was trying to make.

And... it would appear that you knew this, otherwise you wouldn't have gone to the trouble of substituting your version in its place, while trying to pass it off as her version. You would have just done a simple quote-reply.

    It would be great if they could do a full fledged investigation on a federal level. Then either license these people and regulate them or shut it down. This in between hints the process is benign, its not benign, is getting old.[/list]

    As it stands now, you are, once again, posting in response to yourself, and agreeing with yourself, whilst pretending you're someone else. Lol.
    « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
    -------------- • -------------- • --------------

    Offline Whooter

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 5513
    • Karma: +0/-0
      • View Profile
    Re: Matthew Israel Interview (Judge Rotenberg Center)
    « Reply #31 on: October 15, 2010, 09:46:51 PM »
    Quote from: "Ursus"
    Quote from: "Whooter"
    Quote from: "Ursus"
    That wasn't Anne's post that you just attributed to her. You just substituted your own (previous) post in its place.
    I took a double take myself, Ursus, but I didnt mind that she copied and pasted my post like that, maybe she was just trying to bump it up.  If you look one post up from mine you will see she copied my post, I didnt make it up.

    Link
    Nope. Of course she didn't just copy your post. Note her word usage: she states that the process is "not benign," whereas you claim that it's "not abusive." A bit of a difference, dontcha think?

    That was the point she was trying to make.

    And... it would appear that you knew this, otherwise you wouldn't have gone to the trouble of substituting your version in its place, while trying to pass it off as her version. You would have just done a simple quote-reply.

      It would be great if they could do a full fledged investigation on a federal level. Then either license these people and regulate them or shut it down. This in between hints the process is benign, its not benign, is getting old.[/list]

      As it stands now, you are, once again, posting in response to yourself, and agreeing with yourself, whilst pretending you're someone else. Lol.

      Ursus, what is your problem?  Why is everything a conspiracy to you?
      Actually I didnt not see that.  She usually puts something in there like :I fixed it for ya! or changes the color or something like that.  But either way we both agree that an investigation is warranted and we should get them licensed or they should be shut down .  The in between hints it is benign?  okay?  But we both agree it is getting old and needs to be resolved.

      Why don't you discuss the issues instead of critiquing everyone else and their motives?  Without cutting and pasting what other people think what do you think should be the next step?  At least I put myself out there and post my opinions and not other peoples.



      ...
      « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »