Split: Who's Back to Derailing Threads

[TheWho]

Psy, I have more specifics if you like:
Someone hijacked thewhos name by putting a period after it and replicatring the same avatar and signature and shit.  Then they were writng shit about him.  He in turn did the samething to someone else in retaliation to fight back.  
Why doesn’t someone resolve this with thewho?  Why cut the cord after 3 years with no chance to defend himself.
 ::hatter::

[Che Gookin]

Actually moderators do have the ability to modify posts  that doesn't leave a time stamp or any other mark on the post. I used to modify his posts all the time on the facilities forum. Of course he already knew he was banned from my forum so its a buyer beware sort of deal.

[psy]

Psy, I have more specifics if you like:
Someone hijacked thewhos name by putting a period after it and replicatring the same avatar and signature and shit.  Then they were writng shit about him.  He in turn did the samething to someone else in retaliation to fight back.  
Why doesn’t someone resolve this with thewho?  Why cut the cord after 3 years with no chance to defend himself.

Look.  Contact ginger and she can let you know the details of why he was banned.  I'm not at liberty to divulge exactly what went on, but I can say that i've verified what ginger was saying.

[Anne Bonney]

Psy, I have more specifics if you like:
Someone hijacked thewhos name by putting a period after it and replicatring the same avatar and signature and shit.  Then they were writng shit about him.  He in turn did the samething to someone else in retaliation to fight back.  
Why doesn’t someone resolve this with thewho?  Why cut the cord after 3 years with no chance to defend himself.

Welcome to Fornits.   That's happened to most of us at least once.

[Anne Bonney]

A possibility.  

People realized Who was back and began to write parodies of his posts.  Pretty much quoting them and changing a few words. Then they would post them (anonymously) and add the little guy at the end as if it was Who.  The real Who posts (sometimes he'd add the little man, sometimes he wouldn't) were tagged by Deb.  By tagged I mean she put the little guy on the real Who's posts because he would cause so much disruption by posing as so many different people and posting the same thing over and over.  I do not believe for a minute that Deb or Ginger altered any posts.  I think Who either really believes that because somebody parodied him, or he's just a big fat liar.

Possibility.

[Anne Bonney]

I didn't realize he was banned a second time. I would have no problem with him being here if he'd be required to login so he couldn't abuse the anon feature. He's just a total dick who fucks himself in the end because he can't keep his stories straight. If his posts are tied together it will become very obvious very quickly that he's a total shill, to those who don't already know.


just my opinion

[Deborah]

Note: Moved from another thread. Deborah did not write this.

Guest
Posted: 20 Aug 2007 02:52    Post subject:    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

Guest wrote:
A stamp is only left when the post isn't the latest post on the thread and is edited by the person who posted it.
Moderator edits never leave a stamp.

psy wrote:
It appears you are right. It does on ubb but not phpbb. well. I eat foot.
That being said, even if it were techincally possible, if an admin did do such a thing he/she would be in deep shit with Ginger.

Thank you for being honest, psy, fuck thats why I like fornits, why cant there be more people like you and TSW. It did happen (many times). The last thing anyone wants is to get Deb in deep shit with Ginger or anyone else, bottom line it was done. Maybe Deb was frustrated with thewhos comments and assumptions. I dont give a shit about what was altered, he probably deserved it for what he said. the who might be a shit (and many other things) but he isnt a liar, I assure you, and i am sure you feel the same way about deborah (well not the shit part). She is a major asset to fornits and a bottomless well of information that never stops pumping (I love that word). She contributes more than she is asked to do, although her spin can be tough at times.
I read allot here and dont write often because I enjoyed watching thewho, I think he got a raw deal, from a free speech angle and thought I would take a chance and start posting for him or in his place. I know I probably suck at it, but fuck it.
Fornits does rock!!!!
 ::hatter::

[Che Gookin]

That was quite possibly one of the more interesting posts you've made deborah.

I think this is the first time I've seen you use the F word.

[TheWho]

That was quite possibly one of the more interesting posts you've made deborah.

I think this is the first time I've seen you use the F word.

She can get wild sometimes!!  I think when she wakes up tomorrow and realizes she cut and pasted my post over to this new thread under her name she will say  "Holey shit"!!  I just baked myself.  I forgot to use and edit stamp!!  Dam.
 ::hatter::

[Anne Bonney]

She can get wild sometimes!!  I think when she wakes up tomorrow and realizes she cut and pasted my post over to this new thread under her name she will say  "Holey shit"!!  I just baked myself.  I forgot to use and edit stamp!!  Dam.

 :rofl:    Wow, for a minute there I thought Deb was smoking some of what I am.

[TheWho]

A possibility.  

People realized Who was back and began to write parodies of his posts.  Pretty much quoting them and changing a few words. Then they would post them (anonymously) and add the little guy at the end as if it was Who.  The real Who posts (sometimes he'd add the little man, sometimes he wouldn't) were tagged by Deb.  By tagged I mean she put the little guy on the real Who's posts because he would cause so much disruption by posing as so many different people and posting the same thing over and over.  I do not believe for a minute that Deb or Ginger altered any posts.  I think Who either really believes that because somebody parodied him, or he's just a big fat liar.

Possibility.

Thats what I am saying!!  The mods can alter posts, whether it is adding a little man to the end of a post or altering the words.  Non of these changes left and edit trail.
Thewho exposed this months ago and he was told it was impossible because the mods didnt have this authotity and everyone believed the answer and everyone said thewho was just trying to coverup posts he was ashamed of or some shit.  Now we know he was telling the truth, that is all.  Why fucking ban him or contunue to ban him now that we know his posts where altered and deleted.
What the fuck is going on?  You just bail, psy?  and say oh I cant say, I am convinced?  I think you realized everyone fucked up and you banned him because he is a pain in he ass and a dick head, which i agree with, but the result/decision doesnt align itself with free speech unless each of us has a different definition.
 ::hatter::

[Deborah]

That was quite possibly one of the more interesting posts you've made deborah.

I think this is the first time I've seen you use the F word.

She can get wild sometimes!!  I think when she wakes up tomorrow and realizes she cut and pasted my post over to this new thread under her name she will say  "Holey shit"!!  I just baked myself.  I forgot to use and edit stamp!!  Dam.

Do ya ever dream of a world free of ignorant, narcissistic, psychopaths?
Wouldn't it be nice........

[TheWho]

That was quite possibly one of the more interesting posts you've made deborah.

I think this is the first time I've seen you use the F word.

She can get wild sometimes!!  I think when she wakes up tomorrow and realizes she cut and pasted my post over to this new thread under her name she will say  "Holey shit"!!  I just baked myself.  I forgot to use and edit stamp!!  Dam.

Do ya ever dream of a world free of ignorant, narcissistic, psychopaths?
Wouldn't it be nice........

I would take a world filled with ignorant, narcissistic, psychopaths over one which edited the words of others to suit their own definition of free speech any day of the week.
 ::hatter::

[psy]

A possibility.  

People realized Who was back and began to write parodies of his posts.  Pretty much quoting them and changing a few words. Then they would post them (anonymously) and add the little guy at the end as if it was Who.  The real Who posts (sometimes he'd add the little man, sometimes he wouldn't) were tagged by Deb.  By tagged I mean she put the little guy on the real Who's posts because he would cause so much disruption by posing as so many different people and posting the same thing over and over.  I do not believe for a minute that Deb or Ginger altered any posts.  I think Who either really believes that because somebody parodied him, or he's just a big fat liar.

Possibility.

Thats what I am saying!!  The mods can alter posts, whether it is adding a little man to the end of a post or altering the words.  Non of these changes left and edit trail.
Thewho exposed this months ago and he was told it was impossible because the mods didnt have this authotity and everyone believed the answer and everyone said thewho was just trying to coverup posts he was ashamed of or some shit.  Now we know he was telling the truth, that is all.  Why fucking ban him or contunue to ban him now that we know his posts where altered and deleted.
What the fuck is going on?  You just bail, psy?  and say oh I cant say, I am convinced?  I think you realized everyone fucked up and you banned him because he is a pain in he ass and a dick head, which i agree with, but the result/decision doesnt align itself with free speech unless each of us has a different definition.

No.  You can believe whatever you like.  Mods don't have access to the TTI forum.  The only people who could mod that at the time were ginger, kelly, and Deb (i think).

The Who wasn't telling the truth.  You can go on until you are blue in the face about this, you won't get banned.

Even if it comes down to her word against Deb's, I'll trust Deb.  I KNOW for a fact TheWho has lied about his postings.  The same can't be said about Deborah.

[TheWho]

A possibility.  

People realized Who was back and began to write parodies of his posts.  Pretty much quoting them and changing a few words. Then they would post them (anonymously) and add the little guy at the end as if it was Who.  The real Who posts (sometimes he'd add the little man, sometimes he wouldn't) were tagged by Deb.  By tagged I mean she put the little guy on the real Who's posts because he would cause so much disruption by posing as so many different people and posting the same thing over and over.  I do not believe for a minute that Deb or Ginger altered any posts.  I think Who either really believes that because somebody parodied him, or he's just a big fat liar.

Possibility.

Thats what I am saying!!  The mods can alter posts, whether it is adding a little man to the end of a post or altering the words.  Non of these changes left and edit trail.
Thewho exposed this months ago and he was told it was impossible because the mods didnt have this authotity and everyone believed the answer and everyone said thewho was just trying to coverup posts he was ashamed of or some shit.  Now we know he was telling the truth, that is all.  Why fucking ban him or contunue to ban him now that we know his posts where altered and deleted.
What the fuck is going on?  You just bail, psy?  and say oh I cant say, I am convinced?  I think you realized everyone fucked up and you banned him because he is a pain in he ass and a dick head, which i agree with, but the result/decision doesnt align itself with free speech unless each of us has a different definition.

No.  You can believe whatever you like.  Mods don't have access to the TTI forum.  The only people who could mod that at the time were ginger, kelly, and Deb (i think).

The Who wasn't telling the truth.  You can go on until you are blue in the face about this, you won't get banned.

Even if it comes down to her word against Deb's, I'll trust Deb.  I KNOW for a fact TheWho has lied about his postings.  The same can't be said about Deborah.

Its not belief,psy, its fact.  The who was here for 3 years and got booted for what he did in a few minutes.  Could this happen to TSW or yourself or would you have warning or a few days to cool off (max).  The who is still banned because he is different and free speech rules apply differently, lets face it.  Deb had authotity by your own admission (she is a mod, right?).  Thewho knew that months ago when his posts were altered and asked for it to stop (he didn’t ask for anyone to be punished) just for it to cease, he pm’d Deborah one time and asked for it to stop, the response  was “Fuck offâ€