Author Topic: Need more comments...  (Read 2923 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« on: August 17, 2007, 06:35:15 PM »
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2007, 06:44:05 PM »
Unless you're Ron Jeremy.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2007, 09:01:51 PM »
isn't that 'thing' wore out by now?  :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« Reply #3 on: August 17, 2007, 09:06:00 PM »
I think it's hungry, feed it a peanut.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« Reply #4 on: August 17, 2007, 09:09:25 PM »
A little background please. ...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2007, 09:21:21 PM »
In other words, it's so big (Ron Jeremy's penis) that it resembles an elephant's trunk... :o
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« Reply #6 on: August 17, 2007, 09:35:10 PM »
UH,  thanks for the full on report of Ron Jeremy's penis.  However, I was talking about the original post.   :lol:  :wink:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« Reply #7 on: August 17, 2007, 09:37:03 PM »
Oh, silly me. :rofl:

I agree some background would be nice, instead of just a link.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« Reply #8 on: August 18, 2007, 11:30:47 AM »
Background you say? OK, here's a general summary background...
1993, PFC was spawned from STRAIGHT, Inc. in Detroit. They quickly opened up another shop in Indianapolis IN. In 2006, PFC acquired the KHK program (STRAIGHT, MIDWEST) in Milford which is the one that is currently using the old STRAIGHT, Inc. Cincinnati building.

January 2007, the Northwest Indiana (NWI) Times published a 3 part series of articles about how PFC is using STRAIGHT, Inc. treatment modality. It included testimony from recent former clients of PFC. The reporter Robyn Monaghan left the day after the 3rd installment was published. She said it was due to personal reasons, others say it was because of the article. An ongoing mystery ensued. No reporter since has told any story from the side of the survivors or advocate, including Maia Szalavitz.

Either way, a handful of PFC's top supporters (the Porter County CADC) got pissed off and decided to hold a PUBLIC meeting to explain why Porter County (Indiana) should fork over $200,000 to help them start a new facility there in that county. The CADC pitched in $100,000 and another "unnamed" foundation pitched in $100,000. At that meeting and eventhough 4 survivors of STRAIGHT, Inc. came from all over the country to explain why this treatment modality is nothing short of child abuse, brainwashing, etc etc..., Porter County gave PFC $200,000.

Since that meeting, the NWI Times has ignored the survivors and has plugged PFC several times throughout the year. Basically, they are sidestepping their duty to report the truth about how this program is just a continuation of STRAIGHT, Inc. and how the CADC is tied to the DFAF, etc... and all the other rigamarole that comprises this PFC/KHK/STRAIGHT issue. They are VERY biased and are spreading false advertising about PFC/KHK... They are essentially aiding and abetting child abuse by plugging PFC and not telling the other side since the $$$ was given to PFC. Porter County is near Chicago and PFC advertises there too, in hopes of gathering clients for its new building.

It would be nice if folks would post a comment and/or call/email the reporter who wrote this article and tell them more about why this kind of treatment should be stopped. They have kids strip searching kids for starters, that's a crime.

Typically when board members leave it's to cover their asses in a potential upcoming legal action. Or, maybe their conscience has gotten to them, who knows? It's hard to believe that 3 would leave now as a matter of chance.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« Reply #9 on: August 18, 2007, 11:39:22 AM »
:o I forgot, sorry.... The Porter County CADC is comprised of former PFC Parents. So, there you have it, LOL... And also, at that PUBLIC meeting, there was no PUBLIC. It was about 50 PFC parents/supporters one side and 4 STRAIGHT, Inc. Survivors on the other. We may as well have been invisible. Point being, there was NO public component.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Che Gookin

  • Global Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
  • Karma: +11/-3
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« Reply #10 on: August 18, 2007, 12:59:19 PM »
Did the Straight Inc Insurgents even get a chance to speak at the CADC meeting?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« Reply #11 on: August 18, 2007, 08:08:02 PM »
insurgents? all the survivors got 3 or 4 questions answered and talked a little while after the meeting with the CEO and other folks. It was nothin but lip service and lies.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Che Gookin

  • Global Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
  • Karma: +11/-3
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« Reply #12 on: August 18, 2007, 08:27:10 PM »
CADC is a private entity?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Need more comments...
« Reply #13 on: August 19, 2007, 10:27:00 AM »
CADCA is a government funded PAC made up out of whole cloth and programmed parents.

Quote from: ""Some programmed hack""
http://cadca.org/AboutCADCA/Mission.asp

HISTORY

"In 1992 the President's Drug Advisory Council (PDAC), under the leadership of Jim Burke, the former Chairman and CEO of Johnson & Johnson and Chairman Emeritus of the Partnership for a Drug-Free America, encouraged the formation of CADCA to respond to the dramatic growth in the number of substance abuse coalitions and their need to share ideas, problems, and solutions. The organization was officially launched in October 1992 under the leadership of Alvah Chapman, the Director and retired Chairman and CEO of Knight Ridder, Inc., who became CADCA's first chairman. With their guidance, the organization has evolved to become the principal national substance abuse prevention organization working with community-based coalitions and representing their interests at the national level."


To err is human. To really fuck things up requires government funding. Doesn't hurt matters, either, to have half the nations print media in your back pocket.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Need more comments...
« Reply #14 on: August 19, 2007, 11:03:22 AM »
CADCA is a bigger CADC? Meaning, the CADC in Porter County IN is comprised of a couple folks who lost a daughter to a heroin OD, a lawyer lady, DEA agent, maybe, and a handful of former PFC program parents. minus, of course, the folks that left recently.

 :-? Does this mean that the CADCA is 'overseeing' the Porter Co. IN CADC and possibly providing the $$$ to help open that new PFC site? There is an "unnamed foundation" involved. Would that be DFAF or this CADCA agency? I know it's speculation, but, just looking for possibilities at the moment...  :wink:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »