Seems to me that Sandy was used as a pawn for the purpose of bringing down Isabelle, and for what reason I would like to know. I've been to Cathy's site, and ISAC, like no one is making money there because it says referral free zone, yet there are books for sale, memorial funds that are 501 non-profit dated 2007. Where are the donations for that coming from and going to? Whose getting kick backs by hyping those books, and programs you have to download to read the information. Hypocrates.
Well. First of all. Stop attacking Cathy. Cathy has already explained that although her foundation is a memorial fund, she hasn't collected any donations in nearly 10 years. Books? Oh yeah. That sure a hell of a lot more profitable than 10% of tuition like Sue makes. AFAIK she recommends certain books (so do I, so do most people who find valuable information in books and feel others should read them) but it is absurd to think that there is any financial compensation going on, unlike PURE. Programs you have to download to read the information? You mean Adobe Acrobat reader (FREE). If anybody doubts my honesty, or thinks that I am taking money from programs, I will gladly submit to a financial investigation by a third party.
Second of all. It is highly unlikely Isabelle would have been as comfortable talking to a complete stranger (she knows people have been trying to expose her little deal with Pure for a long time) Asking Sandy for advice was necessary for Isabelle to feel like the parent, Patti, was legitimate. It wouldn't have worked any other way. Is this perhaps a little unfair on Sandy? Probably... However I did not intend on exposing her role in things until somebody claimed that Guest1 was Sandy. I was actually expecting Isabelle to be the one to expose that. Given that only about four people on the planet knew about Sandy, and those people are VERY tight-lipped, and had no motive, I seriously doubt it was one of my sources who decided to bring her into this. I will look into that further to make sure, but it seems as if it was Isabelle who was the one to post that Guest1 is Sandy. Perhaps Isabelle told more people what happened, Perhaps it was Sue (she has ample motive, and it's not the first time she has tried to backstab Isabelle, something Isabelle does not know about yet). In any case, it was not my intention to bring Sandy into this at all. It is not known whether or not Sandy was/is aware of Isabelle's corruption. I asked about this and nobody knew for sure "whose side she is on" (ie, is she working as a referral parent or not). As for who asked who for what, I suggest you check
Patti's correspondence with Sandy for that.
Sandy. Please keep an open mind when reading this thread. I am sorry for bringing you into this (even privately), but it was necessary to expose Isabelle's association with Sue Scheff, PURE, and associates (ex: Gayle Degraff, Marie Peart). Google those names. These are not good people. Gayle was responsible for the death of Cathy Sutton's daughter, Michelle. Marie Peart used to work in admissions at Cross Creek Manor (WWASP). It is HIGHLY suspected at this time that Sue Scheff is, currently, referring to WWASP.
You weren't around when the Trekkers list was operative. I, and others were. We were all betrayed by Sue Scheff and a lot came out in the PURE trial about her little referral schemes. It became very clear that Sue only had a falling out with WWASP when she was caught defrauding WWASP's referral system, at which point she decided to start referring to whoever would pay her. She got a much better deal. Instead of $1000 per child, she made 10% off the full tuition. She would not tell parents she was getting kickbacks from programs and actually explicitly denied it (she lied). All of this is in the
WWASP vs. PURE court transcript. If you claim to be a responsible parent, who cares about child abuse in this industry, you should read that document and decide for yourself what kind of person Sue Scheff is...
Don't act like Isabelle was/is ignorant of these facts (sworn testimony by Sue Scheff herself) Patti did not request a program. It was Isabelle's idea to refer to PURE. So was the (unlicenced, WWASP associated escort service). She wasted no time in handing Patti the information for Sunrise and Pure. If she didn't do the same to you, I am perplexed as to why.
