« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 9   Go Down

Author Topic: Split from Apologies thread  (Read 17182 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #75 on: April 30, 2007, 01:51:56 PM »
While that's being taken care of....

Quote
you're just on a witch hunt to try to prove a point that you're not telling the truth about

What arent we telling the truth about Cindy? We've proven you to be a liar regarding the situation last night. What else are you refering to?

Quote
Do you really want to do all that work, just to be proven wrong again

Again? When was the first time?



Quote
it will only prove my point


Which is what exactly? Do you even know anymore/
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #76 on: April 30, 2007, 03:32:43 PM »
Sorry, not my post, I didnt write that... have it checked if you like.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #77 on: April 30, 2007, 03:59:57 PM »
But you said the checkers can't be trusted before.  Hmmm...  Maybe you might want to stop impersonating people and making up phony quotes that aren't from the person you try to pin it on?  Maybe log in instead of anon-bombing all the threads.  Then maybe the confusion would be alleviated.

Anyway, you had previously asked the admin to link your posts to bring clarity, which is why it was done in the first place, so this will just be an update linking all your newer anon posts under the legacy agreement.  Either way, it's time to link them up and get your posts up to date with your username.

You said you "didn't write" that post, but it's realy hard for anyone to believe you because you have been doing a lot of really nasty things lately and trying to destroy personal reputations based on phony postings because you were caught lying so many times and got embarrassed.  Now you'll need to "grow up" and "take responsibility"  We'll help you do that.

I believe you did write it and now have cold feet after rereading your anon posts that may prove embarrassing.  Also, you didn't say not to link them up either, so we'll link them for you, just for clarity.  It'll take a few days to get them all together, but we'll get it done for you.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #78 on: April 30, 2007, 04:26:16 PM »
Quote
But you said the checkers can't be trusted before. Hmmm...


Your right!!  Ha,Ha,Ha,  kind of a catch 22...Hmmmm......when the admin goes in to check they will see I didnt write or authorize it,  someone elses IP will be tagged to it.  They can have their posts linked together if they so choose, but I didnt ask for mine to be.

The last time I authorized to have my posts strung together there were problems and I ended up with someone elses posts in with mine (Ginger will remember) a person named "Little cats" I believe.  Any way I dont want to run the risk of having that happen so that is why I wouldnt approve it.  Other people can do it if they like, but I will pass.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #79 on: April 30, 2007, 04:35:25 PM »
Well, why not allow us to, then we can clear the whole matter up and do away with any possible confusion.

Are you game?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #80 on: April 30, 2007, 04:54:56 PM »
Quote
The last time I authorized to have my posts strung together there were problems and I ended up with someone elses posts in with mine (Ginger will remember) a person named "Little cats" I believe. Any way I dont want to run the risk of having that happen so that is why I wouldnt approve it. Other people can do it if they like, but I will pass.


It's true a mistake was made the last time, however it was quickly corrected and Ginger apologized to you. As it stands now you have an opportunity to clear up any confusion and try and make your case concerning statements youve made which you claim have been altered. If youve been honest and forthright with us you shouldnt have anything to lose.

Right?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #81 on: April 30, 2007, 05:01:48 PM »
Quote
It's true a mistake was made the last time, however it was quickly corrected and Ginger apologized to you.


I didnt mean anything against Ginger, I know it was a mistake, I was asking for it to be done at the time and working some bugs out, just dont want to run the risk of errors right now.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #82 on: April 30, 2007, 05:08:53 PM »
Well on the off chance that another mistake is made Im sure shell again correct it. Can I ask what has you so concerned about it?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #83 on: April 30, 2007, 05:58:30 PM »
Quote
this will just be an update linking all your newer anon posts under the legacy agreement[/b]

No need to ask permission.  It's already been given.  Start the work!

Maybe we can hold off if he admits to lying about Deborah and phonying up a quote he said was her (where he made it look as if Deb altered his postings and admitted to it).  No admission of guilt by Who, no plea bargain; we move ahead based on his earlier agreement.  He has absolutely no chip to bargain, so he's not going to dictate anything.

No need to negotiate beyond that.  He intentionally tried to destroy years of good work that is undisputed by any facts through a slanderous lie and a good person's reputation.  

A full "mea culpa" with a direct apology for lying repeatedly is the only way to even consider not doing this.  Short of that, we do it.

We're waiting.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Q

  • Posts: 7
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #84 on: May 01, 2007, 07:59:56 PM »
If RB is who I think he is he and I were at Hidden Lake around the same time. Alot of what he's saying is being taken seriously out of context.

I didn't like HLA either but I can at least recognize its benefits. Something you might want to try someday guy.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #85 on: May 01, 2007, 08:14:50 PM »
Quote
If RB is who I think he is he and I were at Hidden Lake around the same time. Alot of what he's saying is being taken seriously out of context.

Such as? Specifically.

Quote
I didn't like HLA either but I can at least recognize its benefits. Something you might want to try someday guy.


Sorry champ, I'm not willing to lie about it. I in no way shape or form benefitted from my time at HLA, it caused me far more harm then good. If it worked for you then more power to you. You were one of the lucky ones I guess.

You let me know about those specific claims.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #86 on: May 02, 2007, 02:03:30 AM »
there's a good chance Q is of indian decent. they like to use the word "guy" alot at the end of scentences. that might help maybe figure who he is.

ever hear that skit...goes sumthin like this
"hey you fucking guy you, you kicked my dog you guy. fucking guy you.....etc..."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Q

  • Posts: 7
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #87 on: May 02, 2007, 05:04:44 PM »
Dude I'm not gonna get into this big thing with you. Im also not gonna go digging around on here looking for every comment youve made thats "sort of true". I will give you this one though, you talked about a guy who was on restriction for eight months straight. Your talking about Pinko right? I was in his peer group and yeah he was on restriction for eight months but it was never for just one thing. He kept fucking up so they had to keep putting him on new restrictions. You cant blame the counselors for giving him consequences for his actions.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #88 on: May 02, 2007, 05:43:35 PM »
I have no idea who "Pinko" is, nor do I see why his being a overlapping restriction versus one eight month long restriction for a single infraction would make a difference.

The fact of the matter is however you slice it, he was on restriction for eight months. Or in this case both of these kids were, since the kid I'm refering to was not called "Pinko" by anyone.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Split from Apologies thread
« Reply #89 on: May 02, 2007, 06:18:31 PM »
Quote from: ""RobertBruce""
I have no idea who "Pinko" is, nor do I see why his being a overlapping restriction versus one eight month long restriction for a single infraction would make a difference.

The fact of the matter is however you slice it, he was on restriction for eight months. Or in this case both of these kids were, since the kid I'm refering to was not called "Pinko" by anyone.


There is a perceived difference that you don’t understand or don’t care to.
Devon, That is a classic Half truth… Its like saying I know a person who stole candy from a candy store and has been in jail for 30 years (trying to imply the judge, or system, was unreasonably harsh)….when in fact he only spent 3 days in jail for the candy offense, but he kept screwing up over the next 30 years and kept going back.  This why I personally don’t believe you when you speak of your time and experiences at HLA.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 9   Go Up
« previous next »