Well, you have to understand this from a parent?s perspective. If a parent has a child who is ?at risk? and is not attending school, the reason typically is buried somewhere in what is causing the ?at risk? behavior and if that can be dealt with and rooted out then the academics will fall back into line. So, with that being said the focus should be put on getting to the root cause of the problem and if the TBS can provide some academic structure (as a minimum) with at least enough to keep them going so they don?t fall behind then it would be beneficial to the child, in my opinion and when the problems are resolved the child can reenter his previous school (or new school) and continue on, which many do.
It would be overkill in my opinion to seek out and pay Harvard grads to teach at TBS when the kids focus is elsewhere. These teachers would serve a better purpose at a high end boarding school or someplace where the kids are presently self motivated to learn.
So, what you're saying is that ASR isn't
really a "school" per se, but rather a residential treatment center for adolescents?
Why do they call it a "school" with no accreditation or licensed teachers?
I know why they can't call it an RTC - they have no qualified mental health practitioners and no license to treat anyone for anything - but why do they call it a "college preperatory boarding school" when clearly, by your own admission, they have completely subpar, unfailable, remedial classes that they don't even place focus upon?
Sounds like they're squirming around trying to avoid proper oversight that would be afforded a school or an RTC, but since they don't qualify as
either they avoid even
trying to become licensed or accredited. They know they can't pass muster either academically or treatment-wise.