Okay, Fifth, I've got to respond to a number of your points.
First. Emil has been posting on this forum for some time now under a variety of names, as such is his want, and if you go back and read his output over time, certain elements come out loud and clear. He likes to be funny and has a wonderful sense of humor, which may seem outrageous if you are someone who tends to take things very literally, but he is basically a very solid and decent guy who, on the occassion that merits it, will spout most earnest and heartfelt material that is most assuredly on the saner side of normal.
Second. I appreciate very much your saying "...it happened because kids were being taught to not question the authority of hyde." You COULDN'T question authority! It was not just that it wasn't allowed and to do so would entail punishment, but it went against the grain of what was being taught, it was antithetical to your being any kind of success at all at the place. To question meant that you were somehow retarding your character development.
Third. I really love your spin on the glorification of character over achievement as being nothing more than "an excuse to keep unqualified teachers, and avoid the ardor of putting together a curriculum and doing the day to day work of running a school." I have always felt this, that so much of Hyde's philosophy entailed what was CONVENIENT and FEASIBLE for them to maintain, rather than any true striving for excellence which should, by definition, include academic rigor. I too, experienced ridicule with intonations of accusations of "selfishness" for achieving high marks in the "sciences" (what a joke).
Fourth. I must take some issue with your description of Hyde as "an archaic system of authority figure centered education," although I suspect we are more on the same page than not on this one as well. I guess when I think of an authority figure centered educator, I'm imaging someone more like Socrates (although, if you recall, his students were required to question him and his style was more didactic than dictatorial). In contrast, in my own personal, humble, and I'm-not-an-educator perspective, I do think Hyde is pedagogical in name only, it is more of a personality cult than a bonafide education system. And when the person of that personality is gone, the place will either be reamed out and revamped, or swiftly and effetely fade away.
In my humble opinion...